Home Blog Page 3201

Virginia Beach Councilman Speaks For All Virginians

4

After coming home from work on a warm Friday evening, I settle down to watch my local news and checkout the weekend weather report. I turn to WVEC TV 13 and they are running a story about a local Virginia Beach city councilman, Bill DeSteph, writing a letter to the mayor of New York in opposition to the Muslim Center to be built near the World Trade Center site. OK. This is America and he can express his opinion. May not agree, but this is the right of any citizen. But what really perked my interest was that he used his official city letterhead. Not being a citizen of Virginia Beach, I really don’t know what their rules and/or regulations are concerning the use of official city stationary. Then the reporter read the letter and it stated that the councilman was speaking for the citizens of Virginia Beach and the Commonwealth of Virginia. Huh? Did the citizens of the Commonwealth elect this councilman to represent them? Does being a local elected official give him the authority to “speak” for all the citizens of Virginia? He stated that he had been getting calls and requests from 300 citizens that someone had to do something about this and felt compelled to write this letter. All right Blue Virginia community, I think this councilman needs to hear from the citizens he claims to speak for. And don’t forget to let WVEC know how much you appreciate his spokesmanship on your behalf. Here is the contact info:

Councilman Bill DeSteph

bdesteph@Vbgov.com

WVEC TV 13

assignments@wvec.com

757-625-1313 – phone

757-628-5855 – fax

BTW, if someone knows how to capture the video from WVEC.COM and post it to this, please feel free.

Dear Sen. Hurt

0

“Amateur blogosphere, RIP” at National Level. What About State Blogs?

1

With the news yesterday that the superb FiveThirtyEight.com and its founder, Nate Silver, will be partnering up with the New York Times (congratulations Nate!), Chris Bowers is declaring that the days of blogging as “predominately a gathering place for amateur (that is, unpaid or barely paid)” are “almost completely over.”  At the national level, Bowers points to the following evidence:

*”Established media companies and advocacy organizations hiring bloggers to blog, full-time”

*”Previously “amateur” progressive blogs became professional operations”

*”Bloggers translate blogging into consulting and advocacy work”

The end result, according to Bowers, is that “the progressive political blogosphere is now both thoroughly professionalized and integrated into the progressive media an political ecosystem.”

No doubt, there’s truth to Bowers’ observations, particularly at the national level. At the state level, however, what Bowers argues seems a bit less cut and dried.  Follow me over the “flip” for a few caveats and observations.

First, I’d point out that national bloggers have been consulting and/or joining up with political campaigns for a long time now. For instance, according to Wikipedia:

In January 2003, Markos Moulitsas joined Jerome Armstrong in a political consulting partnership called Armstrong Zuniga, before being formally dissolved in December 2004. Howard Dean hired them for a time as technical consultants in 2003. Armstrong introduced the campaign to Meetup.com and directing on online advertising and blogger outreach.[10]

In 2005, Armstrong worked for New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Jon Corzine and U.S. Senate candidate Sherrod Brown’s 2006 Senate campaign in Ohio.[11] He also signed on with Mark Warner’s Forward Together PAC to develop their internet strategy, before Warner decided to not run for President in 2008.[12]

There are numerous examples of this, other than Armstrong and Moulitsas. For instance, Matt Stoller “was Blogger-in-Chief for New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Jon Corzine’s official blog” in 2005. In Netroots Rising, Nate Wilcox and I talk about Tim Tagaris, who went to work, as a paid staffer, for an Ohio Congressional candidate named Jane Mitakides in late 2004. Tagaris also worked for Sherrod Brown in 2005, Ned Lamont in 2006, and Chris Dodd in 2008, among many others.  Peter Daou ran the superb Daou Report until he joined Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign in 2006. (also worth pointing out, the Daou Report was hosted by Salon starting in February 2005)

The examples could go on and on. The point is, the idea of a purely “amateur” blogosphere, at least at the national level, has always been somewhat oversimplified and even mythologized.

Second, we’ve also seen this phenomenon at the state level.  Here in Virginia, for instance, soon after Eric and I started up Raising Kaine in January 2005, another Virginia progressive blogger – John Rohrbach, went to work for Tim Kaine’s gubernatorial campaign as its internet campaign director.  In 2006, several bloggers were hired by Senate campaigns in Virginia, including Jon Henke by George Allen; Josh Chernila and myself by Jim Webb. During 2007-2008, while continuing to blog at Raising Kaine, I consulted to Judy Feder, Jon Bowerbank, and the South Dakota Democratic Party. Ben Tribbett went to work for New Media Strategies while writing his blog, Not Larry Sabato. Tribbett has also served as Executive Director of the Accountability Now PAC since September 2009. Bryan Scrafford consulted to Jon Bowerbank’s Lieutenant Governor campaign while running Left of the Hill.

On the right, Vincent Harris of Too Conservative runs Harris Media, has worked for Del. Jackson Miller and for Mike Huckabee’s presidential campaign. Harris also served as “Online Director” for Bob McDonnell’s gubernatorial campaign, and is currently consulting to Keith Fimian for Congress.  Jon Henke went on from the Allen campaign to become New Media Director for the Republican Communications Office in the U.S. Senate, then worked as “Online Brand Manager” for Fred Thompson’s presidential campaign, worked at New Media Strategies, etc. Jim Hoeft (Bearing Drift) has worked on “several campaigns in Hampton Roads” and has “served on the Central Committee of the Republican Party of Virginia.” Brian Schoeneman of Too Conservative worked for the Bush Administration and is communications director for the Fairfax County Republican Committee.

Essentially, we could go on and on all day with this. The point is, the “consulting” model is alive and well among state-level bloggers of all political persuasions. In addition, many bloggers wear multiple hats – candidate, elected official, party official, consultant, campaign staffer, activist, businessperson, etc., etc. Of course, the stereotype of bloggers as some sort of “pure” amateurs, living on water and bread crumbs (and no money), let alone “wearing pajamas and living in their parents’ basements,” was always highly oversimplified if not completely inaccurate. Having said that, however, it’s important to point out that the vast majority of political bloggers continue to post their diaries for free or for next-to-no money.  It’s also important to stress that the vast (99.9%?) majority of political bloggers (myself included) started as pure amateurs, earning not a penny for their work.  Even in cases where bloggers make a living – meager for the most part, decent in a few cases – it’s almost never on the blogging itself, but on netroots consulting services of various kinds.  And even then, as far as I can tell, the vast majority of state-level political bloggers remain “amateurs” by almost any definition of the word, earning nada or next-to-nada for their blogging. (not that it matters particularly much; as long as the bloggers fully disclose what they’re doing so you can decide how much – or how little – stock to put in what they have to say)

Third, it does not appear that many state-level political blogs have been “professionalized” in the sense of being bought up (or hired) by “old media” corporations. True, there is the Washington Post Political Blog Network, of which three Virginia political blogs (Blue Virginia included) are members. But that is a completely uncompensated “partnership,”  with no restrictions whatsoever on what “partner” blogs write. That’s very different than a blogger going to work for an old media outfit. In this case, it’s more a relationship of equals, as far as I can tell. Other than this, it’s hard to think of a case where a state-level political blog has been snatched up by an old media operation. Not that I’d be terribly surprised to see that at some point. Then, the state blogs would face the same issues of editorial independence, paid “firewalls,” etc. that FiveThirtyEight.com, Matthew Yglesias, Ezra Klein, Erick Erickson, and many others currently face.

Finally, in terms of a “business model” for state-level political blogging based on advertising revenues, the short answer is…there isn’t one. Period. This year, Blue Virginia probably has earned a few hundred dollars on ads, basically enough to pay our hosting fees but certainly not enough to compensate any of our writers. That’s not a complaint, it’s just a fact, and pretty much standard operating procedure for political blogs with modest (e.g., 1,000-2,000 visits per day) traffic. Until that situation changes, and political bloggers can actually earn a living – even if marginal – by blogging, it’s hard to see how this can ever become too “professionalized.” Until then, for better or for worse (or both), it’s “amateur hour.” Enjoy! 🙂

National Crisis, National Opportunity

0

More than a month after the Deep Water Horizon rig sank into the Gulf of Mexico, we can only begin to comprehend the scale of this human, environmental, and economic catastrophe. It took eleven lives. It continues to wreak havoc on the delicate ecosystems in and around the Gulf. It has endangered huge swathes of our coastal economy from Texas to Florida, and possibly beyond.

Estimates vary, but the ruptured well is spewing 39,000 to 58,000 barrels of oil into the Gulf each day. It will take years to recover from this disaster. Even in the darkest days, we must remember that with many crises come opportunities. Opportunities to learn from our mistakes. Opportunities to seek a better future. This oil spill compels us to take an honest and much-needed look at our dependence on fossil fuels.

As we deplete accessible oil supplies, we will have no choice but to stretch the limits of safety and prudence to find new reserves. We will be forced to go to ever-deeper waters to quench our insatiable thirst for oil.

In the days since April 20, we have seen the cost of our dangerous addiction to oil. It is a cost too high to bear.

Many of us feel a great deal of anger at the spill and those responsible for it. This anger is justifiable, and we must hold BP accountable. They must clean “every drop of oil off the shore” as they have promised to do. But anger should not be our only reaction. Here’s another idea: instead of getting angry, let’s get smart. Every TV set in the country is tuned to coverage of the oil spill.  Public dialogue is focusing on this disaster. It is an unprecedented opportunity to have an honest discussion about the costs of – and solutions for – our fossil fuel addiction.

We must take a decisive stand for alternative, renewable, sustainable energy, and we must do it now.

This is a theme I have been pushing the entire campaign. In my primary debate in April,  I discussed how the pursuit of alternative energy resources should be among our foremost priorities. On Wednesday, President Obama issued a powerful call to action: we must renew our dedication to passing legislation that comprehensively addresses our climate change and fossil fuel dependence problems. I fully support this effort.

There are a number of viable alternative energy resources and technologies that could supplement and diversify our energy portfolio and allow us to move away from the human, economic, and environmental risks of fossil fuels. I look forward to discussing them in the weeks – and blog posts – to come.

National Crisis, National Opportunity

0

The recent explosion on the Deep Water Horizon Oil Rig in the Gulf is a human, environmental, and economic catastrophe. It took eleven lives. It continues to wreak havoc on the delicate ecosystems on the Gulf. It has endangered huge swathes of the coastal economy. Our first obligation must be to the families whose livelihoods are imperiled. We must act quickly to prevent more damage from occurring, and we must insist that BP fulfill its obligations to the people it has hurt.

But with every crisis, there is an opportunity. An opportunity to learn from our mistakes. An opportunity to make sure they don’t happen again. Last month’s crisis should force us all to take an honest look at our dependence on fossil fuels.  

As we deplete accessible supplies, we will have no choice but to stretch the limits of safety and prudence to find new reserves. We will be forced to go to ever-deeper waters to quench our insatiable thirst for oil.

For the last 46 days, we have learned the cost of our dangerous addiction to oil. It is too high to bear.

Many of us feel a great deal of anger at the spill and those responsible for it. This anger is justifiable, but it should not be our only reaction. Here’s another idea: instead of getting angry, let’s get smart. Every TV set in the country is tuned to coverage of the oil spill.  Public dialogue is focusing on this disaster. It is an unprecedented opportunity to have an honest discussion about the costs of – and solutions for – our fossil fuel addiction.

We must take a decisive stand for alternative, renewable, sustainable energy, and we must do it now.

This is a theme I have been pushing the entire campaign. In our debate in Early April, Rich Anthony and I agreed that searching for alternative energy sources should be among our foremost priorities. On Wednesday, President Obama issued a powerful call to action: we must renew our dedication to passing legislation that comprehensively addresses our climate change and fossil fuel dependence problems.

There are a number of promising alternative energy technologies that could provide supplement and diversify our energy portfolio, and I look forward to discussing them in the weeks – and blog posts – to come.  

Susan Mariner Meets With Loudoun County Democrats

3

Yesterday, Susan Mariner once again demonstrated her work ethic and commitment to the Democratic Party by driving all the way from Virginia Beach to Leesburg to meet with the Loudoun County Democratic Committee and discuss her candidacy for DPVA 1st Vice Chair.

Well beyond this particular election, what Susan is committed to doing is listening to Democrats doing the hard work “on the ground.”  That’s why she’s traveling around the Commonwealth, asking for people’s thoughts, meeting with local elected officials and party leadership, and learning firsthand what’s happening with the Democratic Party in key battleground counties like Loudoun.  

Susan points out that many Democrats “downstate” tend to think of Loudoun as Northern Virginia, which to many people is synonymous with Fairfax County.  That, of course, is not the case.  And, Susan adds, it’s important that the 1st Vice Chair have the time to commit to understanding and representing all of the state, not just one part.

Susan reports that last night, in speaking with the Loudoun County Democrats at their meeting, nobody could remember any members of the DPVA leadership attending any event other than a fundraiser. Having worked on campaigns professionally (Susan served as the general election Political Director in Hampton Roads for Barack Obama, also as an advisor on Senators John Miller’s and Ralph Northam’s tough Red to Blue election victories in 2007, etc), she understands numbers, campaign strategy, and tactics.  Even more importantly, perhaps, Susan also understands how critical it is for campaigns to listen to Democrats who know their communities and their voters better than any staffer.  

Last but not least, Susan believes that a key aspect of the 1st Vice Chair should be to interface between the DPVA and statewide campaigns, which makes understanding the entirety of the state absolutely critical. Fortunately, when Susan is elected DPVA 1st Vice Chair in 8 days, we will not only have someone who understands Virginia and meets the other criteria cited above, we will have a committed, hard-working, dynamic, inclusive leader who takes the DPVA to another level of excellence. Go Susan!

Wilt’s “Family Ties”: Another Reason to Support Kai Degner

0



The key lines in this story, published by the conservative Daily News-Record:

“…[Wilt] failed to publicly disclose his financial ties to a controversial natural gas exploration proposal near Bergton.”

and

“Wilt’s ties to the possible exploration and his run for the House of Delegates could put him in a position where he will be called on to vote on regulating the natural gas industry from which his family could profit.”

For more, see this story, including Wilt’s attempt at explaining his non-disclosure of this important information. According to Wilt, he has “not hidden anything,” and this was “a nominal fee paid for those mineral rights” regardless.

Yeah, and if you believe that, I’ve got some oil-coated marshland along the Louisiana coast to sell you.

Seriously, though, this is all the more reason to support Kai Degner for Delegate. Because the last thing we need in Richmond is another delegate in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry!

P.S. If you can, please “get on the bus” for Degner on June 12.  

Dem’s on Malek Commission Need to Speak Up or Step Down

5

(And here’s the exact problem: McDonnell “pointed to the six current members of the commission who are Democrats and have not stepped down, despite the problems party activists have Malek’s role.”  Grrrr. – promoted by lowkell)

Sorry, but this is not acceptable.

… Friday afternoon, when Malek chairs his first meeting of Gov. Bob McDonnell’s government reform commission, the three Democratic legislative members say they don’t plan to protest too much.

Del. Bob Brink of Arlington and Sen. Louise Lucas of Portsmouth said in separate interviews they don’t expect to say anything about Malek. Lucas said enough has been said about him already.

Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple of Arlington told us she will likely not reference the Nixon-era history but will publicly mention the personnel issue.

Sorry, but Democrats on this commission aren’t there just to provide Bob McDonnell with political cover for his non-reform “reform” commission. Sure, Sen. Whipple is correct that “governors are entitled to a fair amount of deference in the appointments they make,” but that does NOT mean there’s any obligation for Democrats (or anyone) to serve on a commission with a corrupt slimeball who served as Richard Nixon’s “Jew counter” (listen here) back in the early 1970s.  

Message to Democrats on the Malek Commission: speak up or step down!

UPDATE: Donald McEachin says, “Yeah, I wouldn’t serve on that commission with Fred Malek as the head.”  Good answer! 🙂

Washington Post: Poor Fred Malek!

1

My main problem with today’s Beltway political media isn’t that it leans conservative & too easily parrots GOP lies without fact-checking them — it’s that today’s Beltway political media is far too cozy to power.

Take, for example, the Washington Post’s extraordinarily sympathetic intro to its profile of Fred Malek, making his anti-Jew crusade sound on par with a one-time accounting slip-up:

Frederic V. Malek, who is among Washington’s wealthiest Republican power brokers, is discovering that even a single problematic episode in government service can be hard to shake.

Jeez, the guy organizes a secret campaign targeting Jews ONE TIME & here we are 30 years later still calling him a secret Jew campaign targeter! Can’t we give the poor guy a break? Hasn’t he already suffered enough?

Of course, that presumes the Jew targeting campaign was the only shady thing Malek did for Nixon. Which it wasn’t. From Jonathan Schell’s The Time of Illusion:

At the pettiest level, White House social life came to be regulated by a system of punishments and rewards. During the summer, an aide named Frederic Malek, who kept an eye on this aspect of White House affairs, told a reporter, “We’ve corralled all the goodies that are available.” Cabinet aides who were “deserving” or who needed a boost “from a morale standpoint” would be rewarded with an engraved invitation to a White House black-tie function. Under the old, disorganized system of socializing at the White House, Malek pointed out, the President “could be inviting someone we want to get rid of.” Now anyone of that kind would be left out in the cold. Malek was also empowered to impose more serious punishment. One of his principal jobs, he told the reporter, was to ferret out “bad guys” and to fire them. […]

A “responsiveness program” was set up, under Malek’s guidance, which channelled federal money to groups that gave the President political support, and cut off federal money from groups that opposed the President.

OK, so he did shady stuff for Nixon TWO TIMES! Is it so bad to target Jews & use taxpayer money for political gain? Cut the man some slack!