Home Blog Page 3248

McDonnell’s Call to Study History

3

In his proclamation recognizing April 2010 as Confederate History Month Governor McDonnell said this “defining chapter in Virginia’s history should be studied [and] understood.” This is a laudable exhortation on the Governor’s part. No doubt many Virginians will set about reading or rereading accounts of the Civil War itself, although the results of its battles are already widely known about and the details of which pretty well understood by now.

What was it about Virginia’s history that influenced Virginia’s decision to join the Confederacy? At the time of the Revolution against the British Empire, Virginia was one of the wealthiest and most influential of the original thirteen colonies. No other state produced as many of the newly declared nation’s Founding Fathers or as much of its early revenue as did Virginia.

But even while Virginia was providing 4 out of the first 5 presidents of the new republic, the Old Dominion was steadily declining. By the 1830s, Virginia had come to rank at or near the bottom in nearly every measure of wealth, health, influence, and quality of life, including literacy. There it remained until Fort Sumter.

The history of Virginia’s deterioration following the Revolutionary War is well described and documented in Dominion of Memories, by Williams College historian Susan Dunn. Briefly, the Tidewater landholding elite fostered conservative policies that restricted suffrage, ignored research in proper soil management, discouraged state financial support for education and transportation infrastructure, and promoted states’ rights.

Because of cultural abhorrence of industrial development and the decline in soil-grown agricultural products, slaves became one of the dominant “crops” produced by Virginia’s plantations for interstate commercial trade. By the time of the call to join the Confederacy, slavery was too economically important to give up, no matter what reasons the Virginia ruling elite put on the face of their decision to secede.

The tale of Virginia’s mid-Nineteenth Century decline as told in Dominion of Memories is morbidly fascinating, like reading a biologist’s detailed account of an animal’s death by slow disease, and subsequent decomposition and corruption. But then the horrifying realization dawns on the reader that the attitudes and prescriptions of present day Virginia conservatives are remarkably similar to those that determined the Old Dominion’s descent to secession.

Video: President Obama on WV Mine Tragedy and Justice Stevens

0



“The President discusses the retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens and coming appointment of his successor before offering condolences to the families of the those who died in the recent mine tragedy in West Virginia.”

UPDATE: More proof that Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship is a sociopath.

To some extent the fact that there were more survivors than those that are lost suggests that the mine was in pretty good shape relative to what mines would have been in the past and hopefully by today’s standards.

This @#$@#$ should be in jail, his company’s charter revoked.

3rd District GOP Picks Candidate To Get Crushed by Rep. Bobby Scott

5

The following is a statement just issued by the Republican Third Congressional District Committee. it will be fun watching Rep. Bobby Scott (D) defeat Chuck Smith by 70,000 votes or so this November. Actually, if this is any indication, it could be even a worse drubbing than that. Given that Rep. Bobby Scott is one of the best people in Congress, that’s something to look forward to!

Sean Devlin, Chair of the Third District GOP Candidate Committee, today announced that Chuck Smith has accepted a call to run as the Republican candidate for the House of Representatives. This announcement concludes a lengthy effort by grassroots Republican leaders from throughout the Third District to draft Smith and persuade him to take on this important challenge.

“The incumbent may call the Third District home, but he represents only Washington special interests,” said Mike Wade, Chairman of the Third District Republican Committee. “There were many fine individuals who considered running this year. I want to thank them for their decision to help draft Chuck Smith. Their decision to bring a united front to our effort means we have a chance to elect a Congressman who will actually represent us, the people of the Third District

In accepting the draft to run, Smith outlined his reasons for running. “Over the past year, spending in Washington has been out of control, and it is only getting worse,” Smith said. “We must help turn the tide by winning this congressional seat for the people. To win, we need a candidate who is conservative, principled and can provide a clear vision for voters on how to get our economy moving again. I believe I am that candidate.”

Concluding his statement, Smith added “There comes a time when our decisions must consider the Greater Good. Our purpose in life is beyond our personal immediacy, interest and goals.”

Chuck Smith is a veteran of the Marines and served as a Navy JAG. As a veteran, he understands how important our men and women are to our national security and the sacrifices their families make on a daily basis. As a community leader active with the Republican Party for many years, Smith has talked with hundreds of small business owners who are struggling under an ever-increasing number of mandates passed by this Congress. His number one goal will be to change the direction that our federal government is going in and make creating new and better jobs our national priority, second only to our national defense.

“For too long, the current representative has failed to demonstrate leadership on behalf of the citizens of the Third District,” said Chairman Wade. “We are determined to give the people the ‘best of the best’ to represent them in Congress.”  

The Republican nomination will take place at a convention on May 22, 2010, in Henrico County.  

The Third Congressional District encompasses the Cities of Hampton, Norfolk, Newport News, Portsmouth, Richmond and the Counties of Charles City, Henrico, Prince George, Surry and New Kent. Mr. Smith’s complete statement of Acceptance to Draft to run is attached to this release.

Support the Families of West Virginia Miners

1

West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin has information on his website about how to help the families of miners killed in the accident earlier this week.

Governor Manchin said, “The outpouring of support from fellow West Virginians, as well as citizens across the country, has been truly gratifying. The mining families continue to endure in this very tough time and will need as much support in the future as possible.”

“I appreciate the West Virginia Council of Churches and their efforts to assist these grieving families,” said Manchin.

Anyone who wishes to make a monetary contribution should contact the West Virginia Council of Churches at 304-344-3141 or visit http://www.wvcc.org/ for details.

In addition, gifts and other items are being accepted for the families of the deceased miners at Appalachian Bible College. For details about non-monetary donations please visit http://www.abc.edu/.

As the consumers of the coal that these people risk their lives every day to extract from the earth, I think our support at this time of tragedy is highly appropriate. Thanks.

h/t: Not Larry Sabato

Jim Moran on Bob McDonnell’s Omissions of Slavery: “Of course it was intentional”

6



Rep. Jim Moran (D-8th) says:

Of course it was intentional. The last two predecessors, who were Democrats, didn’t issue such a proclamation. The previous governor did, but he offered slavery as something that we should not be proud of. This guy doesn’t mention slavery because he doesn’t want to imply that he’s not proud of it.

UPDATE: More from Jim Moran (and Doug Wilder) on Confederate History Month after the “flip.”

Thank You John Paul Stevens; Who Will Obama Pick to Succeed Him?

15

A bit earlier this morning, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens announced that he will retirement, effective in June 2010. First off, I just want to say “thank you” to Justice Stevens for 35 years of service on the Court, plus of course his service to our country in World War II. As Adam B at Daily Kos points out, Stevens’ service began the day before Pearl Harbor, at the age of 21, when “he enlisted in the Navy and joined its intelligence service, earning a Bronze Star for his cryptography work which helped break the Japanese codes”). Now, at age 90 (in less than 2 weeks), I thank Justice Stevens and wish him a happy retirement!

With Stevens’ retirement, President Obama gets his second opportunity (after Sonia Sotamoyor) to replace a Supreme Court justice. A couple of points on that.

First this is more than enough reason for all of us to be happy that we elected Obama, not John McCain, in November 2008.  If McCain had won, he would have had the chance to tip the balance of the Supreme Court in a conservative direction for a generation or more to come, and that would have been a disaster.  

Second, this is a chance for President Obama to appoint a strong advocate for progressive values – environmental protection, human rights, valuing people over corporations, promoting the “general welfare,” defending our freedoms and our responsibilities under the Constitution, etc.

Although appointed by Republican Gerald Ford, Stevens has generally been considered the most liberal justice on the Court. Now, President Obama has a chance to replace him with a young version of…John Paul Stevens! I urge President Obama to make an inspired choice that we can all be proud of for decades to come!

P.S. Names of potential nominees I’ve seen bandied about so far include solicitor general Elena Kagan, Judge Diane Wood (7th Circuit Court) and Judge Merrick Garland (D.C. Circuit Court). Both Kagan and Wood reportedly were interviewed by President Obama last spring before he decided to nominate Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

UPDATE: On Facebook, Sen. Donald McEachin raise an interesting possibility.

It’s too bad that Gov. Kaine took the job as DNC chair. He would be an awsome Supreme Court Justice…Before anyone gets that twisted, I think Gov Kaine is an excellent DNC chair. His legacy as a Supreme Court Justice would be enduring.

Kaine is 52, so certainly not too old to be nominated to the Supreme Court. He’s also very close with Barack Obama. I wonder if this is a serious possibility.

Those Darn Polls

1


Turns out Americans not only like Barack Obama more than the Tea Party, but that they actually like the IRS more than the Tea Party.   At the height of TAX season no less!

See Think Progress and Daily Kos for more.

Oh heck, just check out the FOX NEWS Poll directly from FOXhttp://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/040810_Obama_HC_2010_web.pdf

Appomattox

2

( – promoted by lowkell)

Men, we have fought through the war together. I have done the best that I could for you.

Gen. Robert E. Lee spoke those words when he returned to his men, from the home of Wilmer McLean, where on this morning he surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to Ulysses Grant. Officially our nation’s bloody, internecine conflict was over. Lee’s troops were paroled by Grant. When Lee asked for help feeding his nearly starving men, Grant responded with generosity, using the food that the men of George Armstrong Custer had seized on a train before Lee’s men could get there.

Allow me to offer a few reflections on Appomattox Court House, the site of both the final battle early that morning, and of Lee’s surrender. I think there are lessons that are relevant today.

Yes, Lincoln would soon die at the hand of John Wilkes Booth.  But I back up one month, to his second inaugural.  There are words there which Gov. Bob McDonnell should have remembered before he issued his proclamation for Confederate History Month, in which Lincoln says it bluntly in words I will emphasize in this passage:

 One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause  of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully.

Lincoln, while the war still raged, even as the eventual outcome seemed clear by the time he spoke these words, was noting no superiority, even as he abhorred the institution of slavery.  Still, he insisted the time for slavery was at an end, regardless of the cost:  

Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

And yet, he spoke with a generosity of heart even as some in the South insisted on prolonging the conflict:  

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

a just and lasting peace among ourselves

Perhaps there is something ironic at the place of surrender.  Wilmer McLean in 1865 had resided near Manassas Junction, at which point the first real fighting between a unified Confederacy and the Union had occurred –  remember, only 7 of the CSA had seceded before Fort Sumter.  The First Battle of Bull Run began with an artillery barrage aimed at McLean’s home, serving as headquarters for Gen. Beauregard.   McLean, a wholesale grocer and retired Major in the Virginia Militia, moved South and worked to supply the Southern forces with sugar –  although he had lived in Northern Virginia, his business was largely in the Southern part of the Commonwealth.   He was later reputed to have said “The war began in my front yard and ended in my front parlor”.

Had Lincoln not died, and given both his political skill and his status as a moral figure, this nation might well have avoided the various problems that flowed from Reconstruction.  

a just and lasting peace among ourselves

Lee tried to set the grounds for that with his farewell to his Army:  

After four years of arduous service, marked by unsurpassed courage and fortitude, the Army of Northern Virginia has been compelled to yield to overwhelming numbers and resources.

I need not tell the survivors of so many hard-fought battles who have remained steadfast to the last that I have consented to this result from no distrust of them; but feeling that valor and devotion could accomplish nothing that could compensate for the loss that would have attended the continuance of the contest, I determined to avoid the useless sacrifice of those whose past services have endeared them to their countrymen. By the terms of the agreement, officers and men can return to their homes and remain until exchanged.

You may take with you the satisfaction that proceeds from the consciousness of duty faithfully performed, and I earnestly pray that a merciful God will extend to you his blessing and protection.

With an unceasing admiration of your constancy and devotion to your country, and a grateful remembrance of your kind and generous consideration of myself, I bid you all an affectionate farewell.

I determined to avoid the useless sacrifice of those whose past services have endeared them to their countrymen.  Lee still thought of his countrymen as fellow Southerners, still more citizens of their states than of the larger nation.   And yet, there is also something worthy about how his men were loyal to him as a leader.  Yes, we can criticize the cause for which they fought so fiercely, although we should remember that the vast majority of Lee’s soldiers were not themselves slaveholders.  They had been persuaded, however wrongly, that the cause for which they fought was a noble one, so they fought fiercely.

We are not yet in a state of war, although there are too many incidences of violence in our current political environment.  I do not doubt that there are some who manipulate fear and exaggerate worry for their own benefit, even as they do not really care about either the cause at which they aim the rage they foment or the suffering that will ensue, suffering not only for those targeted, but also by those whose rage has been fomented.  

Still, it is not massive armed conflict.  

I often wonder if some in our nation are not too consumed with winning at any cost.  Or if they are blind to what is happening around them, either because they are so narrowly focused or because they willfully ignore the hurt and the harm.  I see this happen on both sides.  And I then think back to the Civil War, the buildup, the four years of fighting, the aftermath, and wonder how little we truly learned from that bloody period of our history.

Lincoln looked at healing this nation.  He looked beyond.  I have twice quoted a phrase, but done so incompletely.  Here is the complete phrase:

to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations

… and with all nations

If we are not willing to achieve peace among ourselves we cannot serve as a leader in an attempt to achieve peace around the world, certainly not a just peace, not a lastingpeace

How we do our politics plays a major role in the aftermath, even when we win, as we did in November of 2008.  

Lincoln has always been the President I most admired, even as I might acknowledge his human weakness.  It is not just that, like him, I have often suffered depression.  It is that he had a largeness of heart towards others, even as he had a willingness when necessary to act firmly, taking upon himself the burden of the anger that might ensue.

I think all who assume the role of leadership need to remember that to act honorably may cost one – position, wealth, family, health, even life itself.

Lincoln faced death threats even as he traveled to Washington to assume the office of President.  Violence is, as Malcolm X once noted, as American as cherry pie.  We tend to forget all those of our political leaders who faced it, some of whom died, some of whom were wounded.  It is not unusual in our society for those who seek to move the country in a different direction also suffered from violence, as we remembered 5 days ago on the anniversary of the death of Martin Luther King.

I look back at Appomattox.  I look at the generosity of Grant, reflecting the generosity of his President.  I look at Lee setting an example for his men of ceasing the conflict, of preserving lives, of getting on with life.  

Then I look at our current political climate.   I wonder how many of those engaged in rhetorical disputation implying, encouraging, even inciting the use of violence truly know about our history, including Appomattox.  I see elected figures raising yet again the idea of nullification.  I am quite aware that Jefferson was the first to significantly pose the theory, and this while sitting as Vice President under Adams.  I remember another Vice President, John C. Calhoun, who argued for the principle.  And I cannot forget a four year war and the death of well over a half a million when some sought to put that principle into action by secession.  

We should study history.  We should do so honestly, even as the temptation often is to do so selectively, just as for many they will read documents selectively, be they the Bible or the Constitution.  

Robert E. Lee knew that he had lost.  He had enough sense and moral courage not to further waste lives, either of his men or of those they might kill.

Appomattox could have been a key point in the healing of this nation.  Perhaps looking back, we can use it as a reminder that can help us heal our current divisions.

If not, then we travel backwards, past Appomattox, to a time of real conflict, with death and destruction.

I hope and pray that we learn, that we not again engage in brutal internecine conflict.   I remember that people argued from what they believed to be principle, but as rhetoric escalated it lead to physical violence as well.

145 years ago the Civil War effectively ended.  We need not start it up again.

Today, looking back, my usual final word seems most appropriate.

Peace.

just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations