Home Blog Page 3247

Ron Paul: Obama’s “Corporatist” Not “Socialist”

6



I love the reaction of the Republican audience – dead silence, utter confusion – to Ron Paul’s assertion that Barack Obama is not, repeat NOT,  a “socialist.” After being told for months by their “leaders,” including famed political science theorist Sarah Palin (heh), that Obama is a “socialist,” (Dictionary.com defition: “in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.”), now Ron Paul is telling them that Obama’s actually a “corporatist” (Free Dictionary definition: “Theory and practice of organizing the whole of society into corporate entities subordinate to the state.”). Got that?

Yes, it’s confusing.  I mean, how can Obama simultaneously be attempting to push the United States from “the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism” while working hard to entrench corporate power and influence in our country? In the case of health care reform, of course the private health insurance companies are not eliminated, but in fact they get more customers in exchange for more regulation (on denials of coverage for pre-existing conditions, etc.).  How that is either “socialism” or “corporatism” is hard to see, but Republicans are busy making both arguments. This, despite the fact that the non-partisan Kaiser Health News finds the 2009 Senate bill to be eerily similar to a major 1993 GOP health care proposal, the “Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act of 1993.” It seems self contradictory, unless of course you realize that the rationale doesn’t matter so much as the conclusion: that, no matter what he does, Barack Obama simply must be wrong, by definition.  If you buy that, all else follows. If not, you get a really, really bad headache trying to make sense of it all.

P.S. The correct answer? If he has secret “socialist” or “corporatist” plans, Barack Obama has hidden them well. In reality, Obama to date has been about as centrist/moderate a president as you can get, on pretty much every issue (foreign policy, domestic policy, etc.).  Of course, that’s not nearly as fun as throwing hysterical accusations around, so carry on…

Perriello on PBS News Hour: “A Revival of the Moderates” in the Health Care Debate

2

 Last night, the gutsiest public official in Virginia, Rep. Tom Perriello, was the subject of a piece on the PBS News Hour, “Virginia Voters Examine Health Reform”. (Video here.)

 It showed Perriello talking with his constituents about the new health insurance law – talking with them as adults, which was mighty refreshing to see after a year in which calling your opponents “socialist” and prattling on about “tyranny” was treated as the height of reasoned debate.

As Perriello puts it:

…I think that those who are really passionate on either side have faded a little bit, and now the people in the middle are getting their turn to say, all right, walk me through it.

This is the law of the land now. And people get pretty excited when you go through things like extending the Medicare trust fund and bringing the cost of drugs down, allowing people into these exchanges to get cheaper health care, tax credits to small business. So, what you see is sort of a revival of the moderates in this debate. And I think people are liking what they see so far.

Talking about a law based on its actual features and merits – what a concept! Both the Congressman and the News Hour deserve credit for focusing on the facts buried deep beneath the hyperventilation.

And other politicians need to take a look at what makes Perriello such a great populist – simply breaking down the complexities of policy into clear English and hitting the pavement to talk with his constituents about it as often as possible.  It’s not rocket-science – it’s called representative democracy and we’re lucky to have a leader like him to show us how it’s done.  Go Tom!

So today the Republicans had a presidential straw poll

5

to determine whom the Southern Republican Leadership Conference 2012 things should be the sacrificial lamb versus Obama.  And the results . . .

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won the Southern Republican Leadership Conference 2012 presidential straw poll this evening. He beat Texas Rep. Ron Paul (R) by one vote, 439-438.

The full field (with number of votes):

Mitt Romney 24% (439)

Ron Paul 24% (438)

Sarah Palin 18% (330)

Newt Gingrich 18% (321)

Mike Huckabee 4%

Tim Pawlenty 3%

Mike Pence 3%

Rick Santorum 2%

Gary Johnson 1%

there is more . . .

When asked: Who would be your second choice in the Republican Primary Election for president?

Newt Gingrich    19%

Sarah Palin  18%

Mitt Romney    13%

Mike Huckabee  10%

Mike Pence    8%

Rick Santorum   7%

Gary Johnson    6%

Tim Pawlenty  6%

Ron Paul 5%

adding percentages for 1st and 2nd choice to gauge overall strength

Romney 37%

Gingrich 37%

Palin 36%

Paul 29%

Huckabee 14%

Pence 11%

Santorum 9%

Pawlenty 9%

Santorum 9%

Johnson 7%

Arlington Breaks Ground on “showplace of environmentally sound development”

0



For more on Arlington’s new Long Bridge Park, click here. Here’s a brief synopsis.

Planning for Long Bridge Park began in 2001 with the goal of transforming a light industrial area into a green space. The park will be a showplace of environmentally sound development, with public green spaces, high-quality outdoor recreation facilities and environmentally responsible structures.

[…]

All facilities on the site will be designed to achieve the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED program Silver rating. Outdoor facilities such as parking areas, picnic areas, plazas and roads will be designed to make this park a model of environmentally responsible design. Read more about Visions & Goals for Long Bridge Park.

Great work by Arlington County on this one, demonstrating how an industrial area – containg a brickyard, a scrapyard and other businesses – can be transformed into a 28-acre aquatics, health and fitness facility and park. This is the kind of project that should be replicated across Virginia.

P.S. This photo is of Del. Adam Ebbin and Arlington Commissioner of Revenue Ingrid Morroy, earlier today, at the construction kickoff for the park.  

Here We Go Again: Bob McDonnell Angers Black Leaders, Civil Rights Groups on Voting Rights

32

Another day, another controversy for Bob McDonnell.

For the second time in a week, Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell has angered black leaders and civil rights groups, this time when they learned of his plans to add another step for nonviolent felons to have their voting rights restored.

McDonnell (R) will require the offenders to submit an essay outlining their contributions to society since their release, turning a nearly automatic process into a subjective one that some say may prevent the poor and less-educated from being allowed to vote.

“It’s another roadblock,” Sen. Yvonne B. Miller (D-Norfolk), a member of the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus, said when she was told of the change.

Miller has repeatedly introduced unsuccessful bills to allow nonviolent offenders to have their rights restored automatically. “This is designed to suppress the rights of poor people,” she said.

Can McDonnell, Cooch et al. go even one day without angering someone or stirring up yet another controversy? It’s hard to believe these guys have only been in office since January; it seems like an eternity.

P.S. This is yet another example of why Tim Kaine should have restored all non-violent, ex-felons’ voting rights before he left office. Big mistake.

UPDATE: Check out my recommended diary at Daily Kos.  

Why Are 25 Hedge Fund Managers Worth 658,000 Teachers?

1

( – promoted by lowkell)

That is the question Les Leopold asks in this Huffington Post entry.

Here is his opening paragraph:

In 2009, the worst economic year for working people since the Great Depression, the top 25 hedge fund managers walked off with an average of $1 billion each. With the money those 25 people “earned,” we could have hired 658,000 entry level teachers. (They make about $38,000 a year, including benefits.) Those educators could have brought along over 13 million young people, assuming a class size of 20. That’s some value.

Leopold writes

The wealthy will have placed an estimated $2 trillion into hedge funds by the end of this year. (That’s about $6,500 for every man, woman and child in the U.S.)

And there is more. . .

It is now tax time, so consider also this:  income from hedge funds is not taxed as ordinary income, but as capital gains, 15%.  As a teacher at the upper end of the pay scale,my incremental rate is 28%, or almost twice the rate of the income from surplus funds of the rich placed in hedge funds.  And of course I pay 7.65% in payroll taxes, making my burden 35.65% compared to the 15% on the earnings from investments in hedge funds.

I think we face a crisis in this country.  This year rather than hiring hundreds of thousands of new teachers to teach our young, the future of this nation, schools will be laying off tens of thousands of teachers, increasing class sizes, dropping electives, eliminating support services, perhaps canceling extra-curricular activities.

But in time of major financial crisis for the entire nation, the super rich continue to get rich, without necessarily contributing anything of value to the economy.

And you and I paid for it.  Don’t believe me?  Let me quote Leopold again:  

The $1 billion each those 25 hedge fund managers netted (for themselves) was impressive — but doing it in the year 2009 was also slap in the face of struggling Americans. That’s because hedge funds would have earned little or no money at all in 2009 had the government not bailed out the financial sector with trillions in loans, asset guarantees and other forms of financial assistance. It was, in effect, a generous gift from we the taxpayers. Much of that money was “earned” by betting that the government would not let the financial sector collapse. Smart bet.

I know of one manager who put tons of money into bank stocks when they were at their bottom, gambling that the government would not let them fail.  The money he invested did not contribute to hiring more people at the banks.  In fact, the money he invested did not go to the banks at all.  It was our money, through the government, which recapitalized the banks (at the same time they still were restricting loans, and slashing lines of credit for companies and individual’s credit cards).  

Each hedge fund manager was, according to Leopold, worth 26,320 beginning teachers.

I make more than a beginning teacher.  As a public employee, what I am paid by Prince George’s County Public Schools is a matter of public record.  My base pay is 83,000 and I get 7,000 for being National Board Certified.  If I take that 90K and divide it into the 1 billion averaged by each of the 25 hedge fund managers, I am worth 1/11,111 of a hedge fund manager.  Restated as a decimal, as a highly regarded teacher who each year is responsible for the learning of around 180 young people, I am worth 0.00009 of a hedge fund manager.

Now, I am not asking to be paid billions, or even millions.  But quite frankly, I think I am actually contributing more to the future of this country than is the average hedge fund manager, unless the only value that matters is wealth, in which case, why bother to have skilled, experienced teachers like me at all, since most of students will never enter the rarified air of the very wealthy?

I can look back a few years at the fascination of Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.  I see our glorification of wealth and of power.

Yes, we will occasionally recognize those who do good works.  We smile and say how nice it is that there are people like that, then as a society we move on –  will Tiger win this year’s Masters?  How much is Bill Gates actually worth?

Bill Gates.  It is honorable that he is trying to use his wealth to make the world a better place.  But why should his billions give him a more influential voice on education than the skilled professionals who have been trying to make a difference for years?  Yet it does.  Gates and Eli Broad have been driving the educational agenda using their wealth.  Similarly, the US Department of Education is now using funds through Race to the Top to drive educational policy without those policies being any more vetted and discussed than have been the initiatives funded by Gates and Broad.

I began this diary with a question:   Why are 25 Hedge Fund Managers Worth 658,000 Teachers?  My answer is simple –  they are not.  But so long as we measure primarily by money, our values will continue to be distorted, we will devote resources that could be used to improve the lives of millions for the further enrichment of the already wealthy.  

Don’t worry.  I’m not so motivated by money that I will quit teaching and enter the world of hedge fund management.  I would rather see the light go on behind the eyes of a struggling adolescent than be able to add a string of zeroes behind my currently very limited net worth.  

The average teacher does more good than does the average hedge fund manager.  Too bad our society does not see things that way.

Peace.

Weekly Address: Relief for the Middle Class at Tax Time

0

So far, Americans who have filed their taxes have discovered that the average refund is up nearly ten percent this year – to an all-time high of about $3,000.  This is due in large part to the Recovery Act.  In fact, one-third of the Recovery Act was made up of tax cuts – tax cuts that have already provided more than $160 billion in relief for families and businesses, and nearly $100 billion of that directly into the pockets of working Americans.

No one I’ve met is looking for a handout.  And that’s not what these tax cuts are.  Instead, they’re targeted relief to help middle class families weather the storm, to jumpstart our economy, and to bring the fundamentals of the American Dream – making an honest living, earning an education, owning a home, and raising a family – back within reach for millions of Americans.

The full transcript is here.

RPV Chairman Pat Mullins Supports Steele, Changes He’s Brought to the RNC Were Essential

4

This is cross-posted at Leaving My Marc.

 

While many Republicans are calling for the resignation of Michael Steele, after revelations arouse about his profligate spending of party funds on a trip to a lesbian bondage-themed strip club, Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Pat Mullins wants everyone to know that he fully supports him.

 

Mullins supports him because “he was very helpful in Virginia throughout our campaign [last year], and I don’t think we need to get into a divisive intraparty thing like that in the middle of congressional elections.” Mullins would prefer to just sweep things under the rug, what a leader! This seems like a very compelling argument, I wonder what Virginia social conservatives think? 

The Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins weighed in on this controversy last week. To say he wasn’t happy with the RNC would be an understatement.

Perkins said the RNC — and its spending and the flap over a staffer expensing a trip to a bondage-themed nightclub — is “tone deaf” to social conservatives.

 

“The RNC is indifferent at best to the concerns of many social conservatives. The RNC does not reflect the values of the folks we represent across the country,” Perkins said.

Perkins went on to urge social conservatives to not give any money to the RNC. He concluded, “If you can’t run a party, you can’t run a country.” Doesn’t sound like vote of support for Steele.

 

Today Mullins joined 30 other state Republican party chairs in signing a letter supporting Steele. Here’s a notable excerpt from the letter (full letter is here):

The RNC under Chairman Michael Steele is a full partner with state committees, responsive to our needs, and intensely interested in providing the support necessary for victory. That process is not an easy process. Technology has had a great impact on the art of politics. That impact has required the RNC to adapt and change to work effectively in this modern environment. Change can sometimes be difficult. But the changes Michael Steele has brought to the RNC were essential for our party to adapt, and win, when we do not, for the moment, hold the White House or Congress.

I think they may be on to something here. In order “to adapt, and win” in New Jersey and Massachusetts, Steele obviously needed to change things up. An expenditure on a trip to a lesbian bondage-themed strip club was just the change that was needed. Heck, he was only trying to prove his street cred to those northeast liberals (snark).

 

Although a lifelong Democrat, Louisiana-born porn star Stormy Daniels is so impressed by the “change” Steele is bringing to the Republican party that she will run as a Republican against Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) to be the nominee, if she decides to run on April 15. She issued a statement basically saying that Republicans best “espouse her ‘libertarian’ views about sex and money.” Imagine what a huge asset a porn star could be for Steele!

 

All kidding aside, Mullins has some explaining to do to social conservatives in Virginia. His idea of leadership is to just sweep things under the rug. I’m thinking social conservatives don’t quite see things the same way.

 

It’s been a tough two weeks, if you’re a Virginia Republican. Keep up the great work!