Home Blog Page 3337

Weekly Standard: McDonnell “Confederate History” Proclamation “a remarkable unforced error”

1

Although Bob McDonnell likes to pretend that criticism of his constant missteps are all the fault of “political attacks by Democrats” or the “liberal media” or whatever, that’s simply not the case. The fact is, criticism of McDonnell is also coming from conservatives, like this article at the Weekly Standard.

The proclamation was quite a remarkable unforced error from a political team that doesn’t usually make even small mistakes (at least, on the campaign). The hows and whys of the proclamation’s writing are still unclear, but a McDonnell aide suggested it had been written quickly.

[…]

I was saddened by it. I don’t believe McDonnell is racist or that this mistake makes him one, but the proclamation was insensitive. I spend some of my time-too much now that many in the media have decided everyone within a mile of a Tea Party is racist- defending innocent Republicans and Southerners of all stripes from unfair racism allegations. This made that job harder.

Exactly right. There’s no evidence to suggest that Bob McDonnell is a racist, but McDonnell’s proclamation – which, I’d point out, has not been changed to something more neutral like “Civil War History Month” – was incredibly insensitive and divisive. So says the Weekly Standard, not the “liberal media,” although Bob McDonnell and his rabid defenders in the blogosphere would like to pretend that’s the case.

What Cooch Could (and Should) Be Doing About Massey

56

While Virginia Attorney General Ken “Cooch” Cuccinelli wastes his office’s time and money on frivolous lawsuits against the federal government, appearances at Tea Party events, appearances at gun rallies, appearances on a panel a “faith healer,” etc., etc., here’s the type of thing he should be paying attention to.

Massey’s Tiller No. 1 mine in Tazewell, Va., had the company’s highest injury rate at 9.78 [injuries per 200,000 worker hours].

Priorities, priorities, I guess, not that this has anything to do with Cooch’s (non)allocation of time and resources.

So, I’ve been asking around to our elected officials regarding what Cooch can and should be doing about Richmond-based Massey Energy, as well as about its Tazewell, Virginia mine. Here’s what they had to say.

2009 Democratic AG Nominee Steve Shannon

“There’s a lot the Attorney General can do to make sure inspectors are ensuring compliance for laws related to mine safety and that bad actors in the market are punished. In addition, Commonwealth Attorneys are charged with prosecuting violations of the coal mine safety laws of Virginia.”

Donald McEachin

“Attorney General Cuccinelli certainly has the power to look at Virginia-based companies’ safety records within Virginia. Depending on where the safety violations take place, that will determine what course of action the Attorney General takes. There’s no doubt that the AG has the power of the ‘bully pulpit’ to speak out about companies like Massey. That’s precisely what the AG should be doing.”

Del. David Englin

“[I]f an activist AG can go after the EPA and Health Care Reform, he could go after Massey.”

Del. Albert Pollard

“The short answer: if there’s the political will to go after the Federal government…it’s certainly sounder reasoning to go after Massey than the federal government on healthcare reform. The Virginia AG has a fair amount of latitude and discretion to enforce environmental laws. If there are violations in the state of Virginia, the AG could definitely act.”

Del. Mark Keam

[E]very AG can decide if he wants to be more proactive and come up with creative ways to make himself relevant (as we already saw with Ken Cuccinelli and the gays memo, EPA and healthcare lawsuits, etc). I’m sure he can point to some specific statutory authorities that allowed him to intervene in these areas or at least make a colorable assertion that he has jurisdiction to take such actions.

Likewise, I have to assume there are some provisions of existing VA law that would give him the “hook” he needs to bring some sort of enforcement action against Massey, if he’s willing to be creative enough.  Or maybe someone can find such jurisdictions for him and suggest that he bring a suit using that statutory authority against Massey.  The existing statutes don’t necessarily have to be criminal.  They can be civil with enforcement penalties.

I’d look at consumer protection or environmental/safety regulatory laws to start.  I’d also look at federal environmental or mine safety laws to see if they provide for state enforcement as dual jurisdiction in addition to federal penalties.  Or maybe there are private rights of action created under federal law, in which case a VA constituent could ask the VA AG to intervene in his private lawsuit as a party of interest.

In short, the Virginia Attorney General has the power — certainly if he has the will and the creativity to use that power — at the minimum to speak out about and/or investigate Virginia-based Massey Energy for safety violations occurring within the borders of Virginia (such as at the Tazewell mine). The question is, why isn’t Cooch doing that?  As noted above, he certainly has plenty of spare time on his hands, so that’s not an excuse. Hey, for another “$350”, maybe Cooch could have his staff spend a few hours and look into Massey, preferably before a disaster like the one that took place in West Virginia occurs here in Virginia? Just a thought…

UPDATE: Great comment by Gretchen Laskas regarding Republican attacks on those who call for action against Massey. “The only people who think anyone is ‘capitalizing’ on the deaths of miners are people who wish those fighting for mine safety would just shut up.” So true.

Video: Donald McEachin on Rachel Maddow Show

1

Sen. Donald McEachin comes on around 7 minutes into the video, but watch the entire thing, including the part about Ken Cuccinelli speaking at “The Awakening” on April 15 at Liberty University. Fascinating.

Washington Post: McDonnell Policy Is “Jim Crow by another name”

5

The Washington Post rips Bob McDonnell in language you rarely see in that staid, pro-corporate, moderate-conservative newspaper’s editorial pages. Check this out.

…[McDonnell’s] initial attempts to expedite the process [of restoring voting rights to non-violent ex-felons] have come with a fat asterisk that casts doubt on any claim to fairness and decency, let alone moderation

…Only Virginia and Kentucky insist that some sanctions last indefinitely — until the state, in its infinite wisdom, grants what the U.S. Constitution regards as the inalienable right to vote. In the Old Dominion, the result is that huge numbers of people are disenfranchised. Although the powers that be in Richmond regard former felons with such contempt that they don’t even bother counting them, voting rights advocates estimate that some 300,000 ex-cons in Virginia remain barred from voting. African Americans account for just a fifth of Virginia’s 7.8 million citizens but are thought to constitute about half of those ineligible to vote. This is Jim Crow by another name.

[…]

…Virginia’s secretary of the commonwealth, Janet Polarek, who oversees the process, makes it sound as if the ex-offenders would be applicants vying for coveted positions at a selective college. The essays, she said, would allow the petitioners “to have their full stories heard.”

We would forgive any Virginians who do not feel grateful for this patronizing offer. It should not require applications, essays or the approbation of condescending bureaucrats to restore the vote to people who have paid for their wrongdoing. It is a matter of equity and democratic fair play and should be treated accordingly.

Not that Bob McDonnell appears to care about “equity,” “democratic fair play,” or being the governor of all Virginians (as opposed to his hard-right “base”). Instead, as Tim Murphy of Mother Jones points out, commenting on McDonnell’s “nifty little quasi-literacy test,” our fine governor is far more interested in “mak[ing] the process [of restoring ex-felons voting rights] even more subjective and burdensome” than in “improv[ing] the subjective and burdensome application process for felons.” Priorities, priorities.

It’s also nice to see what Bob McDonnell is spending his precious time doing, as opposed to focusing on “Bob’s for jobs,” as he promised during the 2009 gubernatorial campaign. It’s a nice bookend, I suppose, to Crazy Cooch wasting the AG Office’s time and resources fighting for “nullification” and “states rights” – or whatever word he’s calling it these days – rather than fighting, oh let’s say, crime? Actually doing the job you were hired to do? I know, what a concept.

Cooch: Nobody Should Be Surprised At What I’m Doing

3



Marc Broklawski writes

At a April 10th Tea Party Rally in Stafford, VA, Ken Cuccinelli insisted that he had a mandate to reign in the Federal Government. He pretty much stated that we should expect more of the same from him (i.e. more frivolous lawsuits). How did this guy get elected?!

Good question, Marc. I’d also ask, “How are we going to survive 3 years, 9 months more of this true believer/extremist?”

P.S. By the way, Cooch, those of us “on the other side” do care about the Constitution, we just read it in light of 200 years of legal precedent and not in the narrow, twisted way you do.

Joe Biden Welcomes Nuclear Summit Participants

0



Shorter Joe Biden speech: This is a Big. F***ing. Deal! Ha, actually it is, as was the signing of health care reform legislation. Great work by the Obama administration, even if they’re not getting nearly enough credit for their tremendous accomplishments in little over a year in office.

UPDATE: On a related note, a new CNN poll (PDF) finds that 70% of Americans want the U.S. Senate to ratify the new treaty on nuclear weapons reduction. Only 28% think the U.S. Senate should not ratify the treaty. I presume that Republicans will follow the will of the overwhelming majority on this. 🙂

PWC Chairman Corey Stewart Compares Obama Administration to Nazi Regime

9



This Saturday, my Blue Virginia colleague Marc Broklawski attended a Tea Party rally in front of the Stafford County, Virginia courthouse. As Marc writes, “One of their featured speakers was Prince William County Board of Supervisors Chairman Corey Stewart. This is the same person that recently sent a letter to Ken Cuccinelli thanking him for his frivolous health care reform lawsuit.”  Stewart is also well known as a rabid xenophobe, the author of the notorious “rule of law” resolution in Prince William County that was the basis for the film, 9500 Liberty.

Now, Stewart has gone even further off the demagogic deep end.  I’ll let Marc Broklawski take it from here.

With all the crazy things that Stewart has said or done in the past, nothing prepared me for what I witnessed this past Saturday from him.  There were many things he said that were non-factual and completely offensive, but his comparison of the Obama administration to that of the Nazi regime was outrageous (fast forward to the 5:25 mark).

[…]

For Stewart to even suggest that this administration is anything like that of the Nazi’s is way over-the-line, irresponsible and deeply offensive.  How the chairman of the second largest county in the Commonwealth of Virginia could make this despicable statement is beyond me?!

Wow, even for Corey Stewart – notorious xenophoboe and thug – this is really bad.

h/t: Leaving My Marc. Great work by Mark Broklawski!

Congratulations Bristol Herald Courier!

3

This proves that even a tiny newspaper (circulation 29,000) can do great reporting. Nice job, Bristol Herald Courier!

The prize for public service went to the tiny Bristol Herald Courier of southwestern Virginia, circulation 29,000, for revealing that many energy companies failed to pay required royalties on natural gas drilling, and that the royalties that were paid were not reaching the local people who deserved them.

Also, congratulations to conservative political columnist Kathleen Parker of the Washington Post for winning an award for commentary. I don’t always agree with her, but I find her writing to be well-informed, thought-provoking, and fair (unlike George Will, for instance).

Finally, kudos to Iraq correspondent Anthony Shadid, who won the Pulitzer for international reporting. For those who haven’t read his book, I definitely recommend Night Draws Near: Iraq’s People in the Shadow of America’s War.

Who pays for background checks?

0

(Interesting diary by Alice Mountjoy, Founding Member of Virginia Center for Public Safety.  This is one of the advantages of a community blog; I encourage other NGO’s to post their reports on Blue Virginia. Thanks. – promoted by lowkell)

Who pays for background checks? We all pay, but some gun rights enthusiasts have complained that background checks take too long and cost too much.

I reviewed the Virginia State Police website to see who is required to have background checks and who pays for this process. There are requirements in the Virginia Code for people who care for children and adults in day care centers and foster care facilities to undergo a background check.

Pharmacy employees also are required to submit to background checks to ensure the trust that society places on these people who deal with precious human lives and with dangerous products. All of these checks require a $15.00 processing fee and require a 12-14 day wait for the background check to be performed.  The person who needs the check pays the fee unless an employer elects to pay it.

The background check for gun purchasers has been $2 for Virginia residents since it was adopted 20 years ago. Federally licensed firearm dealers are required to collect the fee from the buyer although some dealers will absorb the cost in the price of the firearm. Federally licensed firearm dealers must insure that the buyer is not a convicted felon, terrorist, illegal alien, domestic abuser, and habitual drunk or otherwise ineligible to purchase through this instant computerized check (IBC) by the Virginia State Police. This safety net is designed to promote the public welfare. Unlike the background check for employment or work with children, the firearms background check is completed in 3-5 minutes.

In 2009, at the request of the Virginia State Police (VSP), Virginia Senator John Watkins (R) Richmond introduced a bill to increase the $2 IBC fee to $5 for Virginia residents to buy firearms. The gun lobby worked to defeat this increase in the processing fee. The VSP warned that the increase was necessary to keep staff in place to conduct the background checks. Now the gun lobby wants the additional cost to be paid with General Funds to keep the staff to process the background checks and avoid a wait.  

Considering the cutbacks to education, public safety, transportation, and all government agencies, it is only fitting that the gun lobby and  hobbyists must wait to clear the background checks a bit longer….any effort to circumvent a thorough background check would be reckless. After all, persons who want background checks for employment and work with children must be prepared to wait up to 2 weeks and they pay 7.5 times more for the wait!

It is insulting that anyone who advocates for common sense measures to ensure public safety regarding guns is labeled “liberal” or “gun grabber”.  It is more conservative to seek to ensure the public safety of all our citizens than to assume that anyone who wants to buy a gun should need instant gratification and have first dibs at the public trough.

Alice Mountjoy, Founding Member of

Virginia Center for Public Safety

[poll id=”

3

“]