" " "
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Home Authors Posts by A Siegel

A Siegel


“More Fair, More Simple”: George Allen’s Grammatical and Philosophical Failures – Energy Edition

Virginia Republican Senate candidate George Allen evidently is enamored with the word "more". Listening to his debate with Governor Tim Kaine, George used the words "more fair" and "more simple" to describe his philosophical concepts behind tax codes that would lower the wealthiest income tax cuts.  While many use the "do I want to drink a beer with the candidate" question as influential for deciding what to do in the voting booth, one of my preferred short hand questions: "Would I want the person to teach my children?"  Simply put, my elementary school children would not get away with saying "more fair" and "more simple". In fact, while brushing her hair during the debate (as she wanted me to change the channel), my eight-year old daughter said "No. Doesn't he know that it is 'fairer' and 'simpler'?"  Cutting to the core: George Allen, not smarter than a third grader.

While George Allen's grammar might grate, his policy concepts and ideological are the real issues of concern.

When it comes to energy, George Allen's rhetorical flourishes during the debate might have captured the attention of the poorly informed and ingratiated him with his fossil fuel financial backers, but his truthiness-laden misdirections, misrepresentations and half-truths were in support of policies that -- if enacted -- would impoverish the Commonwealth of Virginia and endanger the Union's future.

To provide a path for understanding the shallowness and danger of George Allen's energy concepts, let's take the time to go through Allen's deceivingly named "Unleashing America's Plentiful Energy Resources and Creativity (American Energy Freedom Act)".

Cherry Blossoms: Another Global Warming Canary …

Pancake with Maple Syrup, PanciousCherry Blossoms at Tidal BasinAmid all the screaming signs about Global Warming's increasingly serious impact on the world around us and on human civilizations future prospects, the 'luxury' symbolic canaries in the coal mine always create mixed emotions.  Global Warming's threat to  skiing (and declining viable Winter Olympics locations), and to wine making and bourbon and beer and chocolate  and  maple syrup and ... production, etc ... Yes, these are tangible examples of how global warming impacts the world around us and impacts us.  On the other hand, compared to increasing natural disasters, devastating storms and droughts threatening vulnerable populations and disruptions to global agricultural production systems, these are "luxury" items that (in and of themselves) whose disruption does do not represent a fundamental threat to human civilization (no matter how important the maple syrup for your pancakes or that bourbon for warming up after a day on the slopes).  Yet, as we all know in our Madison Avenue dominated world, symbols matter and cherished symbols even more so.

As a native of the Washington area, the Cherry Blossoms are perhaps the quintessential universal symbol of nature's  beauty.  While those around the Tidal Basin are "the" trees for the Cherry Blossom festival, there are numerous communities with large numbers of these trees and it is hard to be a resident without having some connection -- year in and year out -- with this blossoming sign of spring, even if one doesn't deal battle the tourist hordes to see the Washington Monument framed by blossoms. (Note, the photo above from GHBrett wonderfully captures the framing using a tree that I am almost certain that I have known for decades and have likely taken 20 photos over the years of various visitors/tourists/family members.)

WashPost continues truthiness jihad against EVs

The Washington Post editorial board has waged a campaign against electrification of the nation's transportation system Whack A Mole Fever(especially cars), often using true facts in a fashion that creates untruthful truthiness.  Whacking such moles is, well, exhausting since it is easier to spin truthiness than to be truthful. Charles Lane's OPED celebrating a temporary closure of the Chevy Volt line provides multiple examples of truthiness-laden editoralizing.

Following guidance from The Debunking Handbook, following the fold are a few truths with examples of how Lane misleads Washington Post readers.

Compare Apples to Apples

Any auto buyer knows that a BMW delivers a different vehicle -- with a different price tag -- than the typical KIA, a Lamborghini isn't a Fiat, a ...  When shopping for cars, amid the myriad of different options, a buyer will try to compare same to same.

EV-opponents all too often slip in a comparison that violates this rule when they are seeking paths to dismiss the value of hybrids (HEVs), plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), and all-electric vehicles (EVs).  Thus, in today's OPED, Charles Lane compares the Chevy Volt to the Chevy Cruze.  Simply put, these two are not in the same league.

New EPA rules better than you think …or Administration claims

Yesterday, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson went to a children's hospital to announce the new regulations to control boiler emissions that will address 40-year old gaps in the Clean Air Act. As Jackson and commentators have noted, these regulations will save thousands of lives and have an economic value easily nine times greater than the costs to implement them. An 800 percent return on investment should look pretty good to any of us.  As David Roberts so accurately put it:
The Mercury Rules Announced Today Are a Bona-Fide Big Deal
Examining the discussion of the new regulations suggests a question: has the Environmental Protection Agency and all the advocates for action gotten the value calculation wrong?

While Meteor Blades at Daily Kos commented Three cheers for the Obama administration's new mercury and acid emissions rules, do we have good reason to belt out loudly with a fourth cheer?

Based on an initial look, the answer seems to be yes.

Solyndra’s DC Showcase … at The Solar Decathlon

While Assembly team with the complete Living Light house members of Congress are raising h-ll about the Solyndra bankruptcy along with many who are forgetting that they once touted Solyndra as the future, just a little distance away, Solandra technology is powering an absolutely gorgeous home available for public visit for the coming two weeks.

This house, the University of Tennessee's Living Light, is part of one of the nation's most important (and sadly too little discussed) intercollegiate competitions is about to open in Washington, DC: the biennial Solar Decathlon. Opening to the public 23 September, the Decathlon brings together 19 university teams from around the globe to compete across ten categories (thus, "decathlon"). After having reviewed all the Solar Decathlon entries, this post will look more closely at Living Light.

Living Light is a very high-quality efficiency house whose There she blows! Living Light has arrived!form is inspired by the cantilever barns of southern Appalachia. In terms of actual living space, this is one of the smallest (if not smallest homes) because of the team's intent: they will take Living Light on a tour throughout Tennessee, showing the reality of the promise of solar technology.  Thus, this is designed to be easily transported (with the direct living space transported on one truck and additional transport for elements like decks and spare solar tubes. Along with more solar electricity capacity than required to meet the house's actual needs (and thus power production that will help boost competitive positioning re electricity production), this design element helped push up the unit's price.

My White House is Solar Cool. Mr. President, why isn’t yours?

Sometimes, your kids tell you great things.
We have the coolest house on the street.

We're cool -- according to the kids.  

Certainly isn't the non-existent slide for the pool that isn't there.  

Our lack of a huge media room and the glaring absence of a gym didn't contribute.  

And, while I've always thought it cool that we live on the white house of the street, that isn't it either.  

My fourth-grader son explained to me why it's cool:

Because we know where our electricity comes from.
Last fall, facing a bit of pressure (mainly from 350.org) about the absence of solar from the White House roof since the Reagan Administration took off the panels President Carter put it, the Administration promised that the White House would have solar panels up on the roof "before the end of spring".

As of today, 15 June 2011, the White House still doesn't have solar panels on it.

The clock is ticking as even with climate disruption messing up our seasons, spring still ends 20 June ...  

Republicans Plan to Kill The Canaries in The Coal Mines

"We think what we can be is the canary in the coal mine," Republican Representative Darryl Issa told reporters.

Congressman Issa's words are prophetic -- evidently he and his colleagues consider themselves to be the 'canaries in the coal mine' since they are taking steps with the newly introduced Continuing Resolution to kill off as many canaries in the coal mine to protect Americans from environmental, safety, and other risks.  For example, the proposal includes a 22 percent reduction in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, massive cuts in basic science research, budgets slashing seeking to essentially eliminate U.S. government research on climate change, ... a true anti-science syndrome agenda.

Innovation Exiled: Interior Sends Solar Decathlon Packing

Innovation. It's the new buzzword. Haven't you heard.  It's the rage.  Ten times ... The President used the word "innovation" ten times in the State of the Union speech.
The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation.  None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be or where the new jobs will come from.  Thirty years ago, we couldn't know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution.  What we can do -- what America does better than anyone else -- is spark the creativity and imagination of our people.  We're the nation that put cars in driveways and computers in offices; the nation of Edison and the Wright brothers; of Google and Facebook.  In America, innovation doesn't just change our lives.  It is how we make our living.

You'd think that every member of the Administration would be doing everything -- EVERYTHING -- possible to enable this critical innovation.

Deceit about Texas Blackouts threatens American Prosperity and Security

In the face of the winter storm that hit the nation, Texans suffered a series of rolling blackouts as some 50 fossil-fueled power plants (coal and natural gas) shut down due to frozen pipes and other problems. (See: Blacked Out Texas: Seeking understanding or Falsely laying blame?)  In the face of readily available information, including from Texas' own grid-managers (ERCOT), there is a bevy of fossil-foolish commentators falsely asserting that 'greening' efforts are to blame for freezing Texans.  For example,
  • The Drudge Report has suggested that  the Texas blackouts were "a direct consequence of the Obama administration's agenda to lay siege to the coal industry, launch a takeover of infrastructure under the contrived global warming scam, and help usher in the post-industrial collapse of America."
  • Rush Limbaugh has put the blame on 'federal red tape'.  "It's not just in Texas, that's everywhere. And, folks, let me tell you something: If Obama gets his way, rolling blackouts will be the new norm. What do you think 'green energy' is?"

These political motivated and, well, simply false attacks threaten American prosperity and security.

DC streets most clogged in nation: what can we do?

The Texas Transportation Institute of Texas A&M University recently released TTI's annual traffic study.   Not surprisingly, it made the front page in the Washington, DC, area since DC tied with Chicago for the nation's worse traffic congestion. Putting aside not-minor methodological issues (see here as well), the simple reality is that it gets much (MUCH) harder to move around DC in an automobile year-after-year.    This then leads to a simple question as to 'what to do about this'.  Do we simply need more roads?  Is public transit the only answer?  Or, can a variety of efficiencies provide a significant part of the answer?
- Blue Virginia Sponsor -

Daily News Briefings