We thought Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida reached a low point when he falsely accused his opponent of being a draft dodger during the Vietnam War, and of not loving his country. But now Grayson has lowered the bar even further. He's using edited video to make his rival appear to be saying the opposite of what he really said.Watch the ad, then watch the unedited video (see after the "fold") and decide for yourself. Here are the comments by Webster, which show that he meant the exact opposite of what Grayson's ad claims he meant.
In a new ad, Grayson accuses his Republican opponent Daniel Webster of being a religious fanatic and dubs him "Taliban Dan." But to make his case, Grayson manipulates a video clip to make it appear Webster was commanding wives to submit to their husbands, quoting a passage in the Bible. Four times, the ad shows Webster saying wives should submit to their husbands. In fact, Webster was cautioning husbands to avoid taking that passage as their own. The unedited quote is: "Don't pick the ones [Bible verses] that say, 'She should submit to me.'"
1. ANTI-TAX GROUP SAYS ABC PLAN DOESN'T RAISE TAXES
3. DEMOCRATS TO HOLD TOWN HALL MEETINGS ON ABC PRIVATIZATION
5. MCDONNELL SAYS STATE'S REGIONS MUST COPE WITH GROWTH
7. CUCCINELLI TO CAMPAIGN WITH CANDIDATES IN ALABAMA -- AND IOWA
11. LOOK WHO'S NOT COMING TO BREAKFAST: DEFENSE SECRETARY GATES
14. OBAMA HITTING RICHMOND ON WEDNESDAY TO TALK ECONOMY AND POLITICS...
15. GOP PLAN TUESDAY EVENT IN ADVANCE OF OBAMA VISIT TO RICHMOND...
18. THREE AMENDMENTS ON BALLOT IN VA.
21. CONNOLLY AD: 'I'VE MADE BOTH PARTIES MAD'
23. EMBATTLED BOUCHER ATTACKS GRIFFITH IN TV AD
27. STUDY FINDS VA. GUNS OFTEN USED IN-OUT-STATE CRIMES
37. RESTORING VOTING RIGHTS
I can't embed the video of this interview, but check it out at Vivian Paige's blog. In addition to his response on the viciously homophobic (and generally insane) Westboro Baptist Church's 1st Amendment rights (or lack thereof), Webb also discusses the Defense Secretary's decision to shut down JFCOM.
On the first issue, I have mixed feelings, but the more I think about it, the more I believe that this group's hate speech, despite being utterly despicable, is probably protected under the 1st Amendment. In fact, the only legitimate reason I can think of why it should not be protected stems from the Schenk case, if "the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." If that's the case with the Westboro Baptist Church, that it makes people so angry that it incites them to violence, then how would the 1st Amendment protect all kinds of speech that we disagree with, find intolerable, feel enraged about, etc? As much as I despise the Westboro Baptist Church and wish I never had to hear from them again, I can't think of a justification for denying them their 1st Amendment constitutional rights.
On the second issue, I think it's totally appropriate for the Virginia delegation to ask tough questions of Secretary Gates about his decision. In the end, though, it's his decision, and I don't believe the Virginia delegation can do a great deal about it in the end.
P.S. Excellent job by Vivian on this interview, and also on the one with Glenn Nye. Like Webb, Nye argues that the 1st Amendment doesn't cover the Westboro Baptist Church's disruption of military funerals, and that JFCOM shouldn't have been shut down. Your thoughts?
P.P.S. If the Westboro Baptist Church's hate speech isn't protected, then I'm not sure how flag burning, Koran burning, bible burning, etc. would be protected either.
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) will next week head to Alabama and, more interestingly, to Iowa to campaign with Republican candidates for attorney general.If he travels to New Hampshire, South Carolina or Nevada in coming weeks, I'll really start to worry. For now, though, this is bad enough.
The outspoken Virginia conservative, who is suing the Obama administration over the federal health-care law and EPA greenhouse gas regulations, has been in increasing demand nationally from Republican candidates and organizations.
His political action committee will announce Monday that he'll campaign for Republican Brenna Findley in Iowa on Oct. 4 and Republican Luther Strange in Alabama on Oct. 5. Neither trip involves taxpayer money.
"What this does is help refute some of the statements that people make on the pro-gun side in saying that tougher gun laws are unconnected to reducing crime," he said.Where does Virginia fit into all this? According to the study, Virginia is one of the top 10 states, on a per capita basis, in terms of gun export rates. These 10 states "also supply a greater proportion of guns that are likely to have been trafficked." And, not surprisingly, "There is a strong association between a state's gun laws and that state's propensity to export crime guns." Which is why it's not surprising that, in 2009, Virginia - with its relatively lax gun laws - ranked third in the nation in top interstate crime gun supplier states, behind only Georgia and Florida. It's also why laws like "one gun a month" and closing the "gunshow loophole" are so important, if we could ever get them passed in Virginia.
"A state's gun laws are only as good as the weakest link in the national chain," Professor Fox said. "A state with weaker gun laws becomes a supplier for states with stronger laws."
Indeed, the authors of the mayors' study, which was prepared largely out of Mr. Bloomberg's office, said the findings suggested that gun traffickers had sought out states with less restrictive gun-purchase laws.
"What this really shows is that bad laws really do equal more gun trafficking," said John Feinblatt, Mr. Bloomberg's chief policy adviser, "and that gaps in the law really do make a difference."
For more information on this important and powerful film, centered in Prince William County, Virginia, click here. And, of course, congratulations to filmmakers Eric Byler and Annabel Park for receiving so much viewership and well-deserved praise for "9500 Liberty!"
1. MORRISSEY PLANS TO PURSUE PROTECTIVE-ORDER LEGISLATION
2. SENATE COMMITTEE TO HOLD HEARING ON CLOSING JOINT FORCES COMMAND
4. RETIRED DOCTOR TAKES ON FORBES IN 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
5. EASTERN SHORE DOCTOR FACES PROBATION OVER LYME DISEASE CASES
6. DEFENSE CONTRACTORS ON OFFENSIVE
7. USED CARS APPRECIATION MEANS HIGHER TAXES
9. SMOOTHER ROADS AHEAD
10. ANSWERS NEEDED AT JOINT FORCES
11. TEMPORARY BUILDINGS TO EASE JAIL OVERCROWDING IN CHESAPEAKE
13. SEIZED POT IS VALUED AT $5 MILLION