Home Blog Page 1988

National and Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

6

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, July 21.

*The world’s most famous climate scientist just outlined an alarming scenario for our planet’s future (This should be the #1 headline in every newspaper and on every newscast in America. Why isn’t it?)

*Death of woman found hanged in Texas cell to be treated like murder probe: prosecutor (As well it should be!)

*Attacking Donald Trump seems to only make him stronger (The Republican Party is apparently full of people who thrill to Trump’s message of extremism, bigotry, intolerance, ignorance and idiocy. Who knew? Heh.)

*Trump surges to big lead in GOP presidential field

*Is Scott Walker ignorant by choice?

*The Republican poll nightmare that is Donald Trump, in four charts

*Poll: Majority of Americans Support Iran Deal Despite Skepticism

*U.S. and Cuba Reopen Long-Closed Embassies

*This GOP Presidential Candidate Actually Believes in Climate Change. But He Doesn’t Want to Fix It. (I’m trying to decide which is more evil, not “believing” in climate change or believing in it and not wanting to “overreact,” as John Kasich so idiotically says.)

*How the US Chamber of Commerce Is Helping Big Tobacco Poison the Rest of the World (Speaking of evil, I present to you…)

*Republicans fear their activist base. Democrats don’t. (Excellent article.)

*The gerrymandering jig should be up (“Both Mr. McAuliffe and Mr. Hogan are on record as backing redistricting reform to minimize political shenanigans when their state legislatures redraw electoral lines after each decennial census.”)

*Va. Republicans fight McAuliffe’s effort to study reinstating parole (So typical.)

*McAuliffe’s panel begins review of no-parole policy

*Bagby faces Lambert Tuesday in special election for Morrissey’s former seat (“Democrat Lamont Bagby faces independent candidate David M. Lambert in Tuesday’s special election in the turmoil-ridden 74th House of Delegates district, which covers parts of the city of Richmond and Henrico County and all of Charles City County.”)

*New website offers ‘one-stop shop’ on coastal resilience in Hampton Roads

*Jump in child poverty a warning bell for Virginia, advocates say

*Mark Herring weighs in on Confederate flag in Danville (“State law currently does not allow the Confederate battle flag to be removed.”)

*Editorial: Stadium debate – seize this chance for regional cooperation

*Arlington won’t be getting a new gun shop after property owner backs out (No loss there, that’s for sure.)

*Nationals beat Harvey, take first game of NL East showdown with Mets

*D.C. area forecast: Heat today, gone tomorrow with nicer rest of week ahead

Any Further Questions About the GOP, aka the “Stupid Party?”

0

In short, Republican primary voters loooove them some serious immigrant bashing and other extremism, lunacy, bombastic idiocy, etc. Nope, Donald Trump is not an outlier, he epitomizes a party that also includes Ken Cuccinelli, EW Jackson, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, Steve King, James “No Global Warming Cuz I Brought a Snowball Into the Capitol and Stuff” Inhofe, Louie “ISIS camp three miles south of El Paso” Gohmert, Ayn Rand-worshipping Dave Brat, Bobby “Stupid Party” Jindal, and too many other nutjobs to keep track of.

Meanwhile, on the Democratic side, the sane, sensible Hillary Clinton’s got a huge lead for the nomination, and also a nice lead over Jeb Bush (which widens to a HUGE lead if Trump runs as an independent – pleasepleaseplease!) in the general election. Good times…if you’re a Democrat, that is. Donald Trump, please don’t go away anytime soon! 🙂

UVA Study: 11 Major Flaws in Coal Center’s Energy Analysis Relied On by Gov. McAuliffe, Legislature

0

 

In a study released last week, energy expert Dr. William Shobe of the University of Virginia dismantles the key, state-sanctioned analysis of how Virginia should meet the requirements of the federal Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions.

That analysis, produced last fall by a team led by Dr. Michael Karmis, director of the Center for Coal and Energy Research at Virginia Tech, is part of the Virginia Energy Plan and is relied upon by Gov. Terry McAuliffe and the legislature as they make decisions about the state’s energy future.

“In short, the report is almost certainly worse than no study at all because it misstates likely costs, analyzes irrelevant options, and gives short shrift to the cases that really matter,” writes Shobe.

A professor of public policy and director of the Center for Economic and Policy Studies, Dr. Shobe’s research focuses on climate change, greenhouse gas markets, and auction design. Shobe was part of the team that designed the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative for nine Northeast states, a cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon emissions that has generated $1.3 billion in economic benefits and 14,000 job-years over the past three years.

“Old Boy” Selection Process



Last fall, we questioned why Dr. Karmis – who is an international consultant to the coal industry – had been chosen by the McAuliffe Administration’s Dept. of Mines, Minerals & Energy (DMME) to write a 199-page analysis of how Virginia should best meet the requirements of the federal Clean Power Plan.  By repeatedly evading my basic questions about how and why he was chosen, Karmis and DMME only heightened suspicions about what appears to be an “old boy” selection process heavily influenced by the fossil fuel industry.

But now it is clear that the process was more than unseemly: the sloppy, coal-friendly conclusions of Karmis’ report are contributing to Virginia status as an also-ran in clean energy development.

Notable problems Shobe found with Karmis’ analysis include:

  • Double counts compliance costs by about $400 million annually because the authors added together two different estimates of compliance costs.
  • Made a calculation mistake that cut the estimated benefits of emission reductions by more than 40%.
  • Used inappropriate and incomplete economic analysis in estimating total economic costs and associated job losses, inflating cost and job losses.
  • Misinterpreted, on at least two occasions, analysis provided by the EPA in the EPA’s regulatory impact analysis of its proposed rule.

(For a full list of errors, click here.)

In addition to reviewing Karmis’ analysis, Professor Shobe makes useful recommendations to ensure state agencies such as DMME, the Dept. of Environmental Quality, and the State Corporation Commission are able to properly assess studies presented to them.

An Impartial Coal Expert?

Virginia is having a critical conversation about Clean Power Plan compliance options and strategies. Citizens must ask themselves: should the Commonwealth’s policymakers continue to rely upon an energy analysis produced by coal expert Michael Karmis that we now know is utterly flawed?

Last November, I concluded a post by asking whether Dr. Karmis was too conflicted to write a document the governor and legislature would depend upon as an unbiased, informed look at how the state can best respond to the Clean Power Plan. By submitting a report with flawed methodology, basic factual errors and biased conclusions in favor of the coal industry, it seems the answer regarding Dr. Karmis’s conflicts is a resounding yes.

Scott Peterson is executive director of the  Checks and Balances Project, a national watchdog blog that seeks to hold government officials, lobbyists, and corporate management accountable to the public. Funding for C&BP comes from pro-clean energy philanthropies and donors.

UVA Study: 11 Major Flaws in Coal Center’s Energy Analysis Relied On by Gov. McAuliffe, Legislature

0

(I posted about this recently as well, but it deserves more attention! – promoted by lowkell)

University of Virginia Study Finds 11 Major Flaws in Coal Center's Energy Analysis Relied Upon by Gov. McAuliffe and LegislatureCross posted from the Checks and Balances Project

In a study released last week, energy expert Dr. William Shobe of the University of Virginia dismantles the key, state-sanctioned analysis of how Virginia should meet the requirements of the federal Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions.

That analysis, produced last fall by a team led by Dr. Michael Karmis, director of the Center for Coal and Energy Research at Virginia Tech, is part of the Virginia Energy Plan and is relied upon by Gov. Terry McAuliffe and the legislature as they make decisions about the state’s energy future.

“In short, the report is almost certainly worse than no study at all because it misstates likely costs, analyzes irrelevant options, and gives short shrift to the cases that really matter,” writes Shobe.

A professor of public policy and director of the Center for Economic and Policy Studies, Dr. Shobe’s research focuses on climate change, greenhouse gas markets, and auction design. Shobe was part of the team that designed the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative for nine Northeast states, a cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon emissions that has generated $1.3 billion in economic benefits and 14,000 job-years over the past three years.

“Old Boy” Selection Process

Is Karmis Too Conflicted to Analyze How Virginia Can Respond to Fed's Clean Power Plan?

Michael Karmis, Ph.D

Last fall, we questioned why Dr. Karmis – who is an international consultant to the coal industry – had been chosen by the McAuliffe Administration’s Dept. of Mines, Minerals & Energy (DMME) to write a 199-page analysis of how Virginia should best meet the requirements of the federal Clean Power Plan.  By repeatedly evading my basic questions about how and why he was chosen, Karmis and DMME only heightened suspicions about what appears to be an “old boy” selection process heavily influenced by the fossil fuel industry.

But now it is clear that the process was more than unseemly: the sloppy, coal-friendly conclusions of Karmis’ report are contributing to Virginia status as an also-ran in clean energy development.

Notable problems Shobe found with Karmis’ analysis include:

  • Double counts compliance costs by about $400 million annually because the authors added together two different estimates of compliance costs.
  • Made a calculation mistake that cut the estimated benefits of emission reductions by more than 40%.
  • Used inappropriate and incomplete economic analysis in estimating total economic costs and associated job losses, inflating cost and job losses.
  • Misinterpreted, on at least two occasions, analysis provided by the EPA in the EPA’s regulatory impact analysis of its proposed rule.

(For a full list of errors, click here.)

In addition to reviewing Karmis’ analysis, Professor Shobe makes useful recommendations to ensure state agencies such as DMME, the Dept. of Environmental Quality, and the State Corporation Commission are able to properly assess studies presented to them.

An Impartial Coal Expert?

Virginia is having a critical conversation about Clean Power Plan compliance options and strategies. Citizens must ask themselves: should the Commonwealth’s policymakers continue to rely upon an energy analysis produced by coal expert Michael Karmis that we now know is utterly flawed?

Last November, I concluded a post by asking whether Dr. Karmis was too conflicted to write a document the governor and legislature would depend upon as an unbiased, informed look at how the state can best respond to the Clean Power Plan. By submitting a report with flawed methodology, basic factual errors and biased conclusions in favor of the coal industry, it seems the answer regarding Dr. Karmis’s conflicts is a resounding yes.

Scott Peterson is executive director of the  Checks and Balances Project, a national watchdog blog that seeks to hold government officials, lobbyists, and corporate management accountable to the public. Funding for C&BP comes from pro-clean energy philanthropies and donors.

What is a Good Relationship Between Government and Business?

0

This piece ran a few days ago in the Northern Virginia Daily, one of the two main newspapers in the District in which I am running for Virginia state senate against the Republican incumbent, Mark Obenshain.

Recently I was invited to speak to a group whose purpose is to make the relationship between business and government in Virginia as good as it can be. I share that goal.

At the same time, as I told that group, in our times it would not be right for me to do what most politicians would do with such an opportunity: i.e. tell the audience just what they wanted to hear. I felt it important to say what most needs saying.

Being a strong believer in free markets, I said, I appreciate the role that business has played in making America great. So government policies should not unduly burden free markets.

But I went on to say that, “My concern for Virginia today, and indeed for America, has less to do with how government is interfering with free markets than with how the power of corporate money is interfering with the proper functioning of our democracy.”

I then gave an example of what the optimal relationship between business and government would not include:

“It would not include having a giant corporation – a monopoly not held in check by market competition — buying so much control over Virginia’s government that, in the past two years, it has been able to get our General Assembly to pass laws that take literally hundreds of millions of dollars that rightly belong to average Virginians and to put into its corporate coffers.”

I was talking, of course, about Dominion Power — the largest corporate donor to our legislators — buying what is obviously undue influence over members of both parties.

The oath that our founders put into the Constitution shows clearly that what they wanted for us to defend, above all, is not the flag, not even the homeland. It is, rather, the system of government they gave us-government by and for the people.

That’s why I regard it as the first duty of an American patriot to protect the gift our founders gave us, and restore to the people our rightful power over the government.

Thus, while part of government’s job is to create a good environment for businesses to prosper, part of the responsibility of business is to welcome, not resist, government’s efforts to protect the good of all by addressing problems that market forces, by themselves, are unable to address.

Economists have recognized for generations the problem of what they call “externalities.” These are costs and benefits that are imposed on the system as a whole and do not relate specifically to the interests of the buyers and sellers in the market.  

For example, the market by itself has a blind spot when it comes to things like pollution of the air we breathe or the water we drink.  

Now we face the most serious externality in human history. I’m talking about the problem of climate change.

In the face of this vitally important challenge, the role being played by some mighty corporations has been disgraceful. As is now well-documented, much corporate money has been spent to deceive people into believing what the companies themselves know is not true. They don’t want Americans to heed the urgent warnings that 97% of the world’s best experts in the field are issuing about this growing crisis.

With our children and grandchildren depending on us now to act responsibly to protect them, here in Virginia that same corporate money has bought the help of politicians in blocking our taking even easy and prudent measures.

This is unacceptable. In dealing with climate change, we all should be guided by the central moral principle of Christianity: the Golden Rule.  

If we were in the position of our children and grandchildren, how would we want for those wielding power over our future – by their actions and their inactions, whether in government or in business-to do unto us?

A “good” relationship between government and business, therefore, has a vital moral dimension.  It involves not only government aiding business in its important role of creating American prosperity. But it also calls for business to facilitate, rather than resist, government regulation of business when the public good requires it.

“Sometimes, self-interest, which the free market is so good at harnessing,” I told this business group in conclusion, “has to be held in check by judgments made on behalf of the whole and translated into action by a democratically elected government.

“The sometimes conflicting demands of freedom and order have always needed to be sorted out with wisdom. Our founders understood that. So must we.”

April Moore is running for the Virginia State Senate in the 26th District, which includes Shenandoah, Warren, Page, and Rappahannock Counties, as well as northern Rockingham County and the city of Harrisonburg .

Swift-Boat Beatdown

0

Donald Trump stuck a stick into a hornets nest when he made his disgraceful comments about Senator John Mc Cain’s service to America.

The first people to call Trump out were Democrats, including Hillary Clinton. There is, if Twitter is to be believed, considerable support for Trump’s remarks among the far right wing of the party.

Democrats and Progressives have considerable experience being on the receiving end of GOP slanders and name calling, which is what GOPers do in the absence of facts or rational suggestions.  

We don’t much like it.

John McCain is quite able to defend himself, squatting comfortably if not too safely in the Senate. After an indecently long interval, the GOP elite (represented by the Klown Kar, except Ted Cruz) rose up in protest as well.  

There is a supreme irony here, in that even the GOP elite really doesn’t seem to like the use of the Swift Boat Beatdown, at least when applied  to one of their own.

The “base” doesn’t see it that way:  deliberately dumbed down by 40 years GOP policy telling them

–that the world is simple, that truth is only in black and white (applicable to print, not people)

–given the power, through gerrymandered districts, to command the Republican primaries, made a force to be reckoned with

It thinks this counts as reasonable political commentary.

John Kerry and Max Cleland are properly cited as victims of swift-boating.  There is one more “swift-boated” Democrat, smeared by a Republican, and not usually mentioned in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s comments on Senator John McCain.

Tammy Duckworth, Democratic Congress critter from Illinois.

Ms. Duckworth apparently rang every contemptible cowardly bell in the heads of the GOP hierarchy:

1.  Female (good only in their minds as a semen depository, or a forced incubator)

2. Born in Thailand (though of an American father, to a birther that makes her somehow “not American”)

3. Asian American (yellow menace threatening the purity of the white race)

4. Fluent in Thai, Bahassa, and Indonesian (uppity educated broad, plus she has a phD)

5.  Combat veteran (makes the yeah-rah neo-cons who never served look bad)

6.  Former Illinois Dept of Veterans Affairs appointee, specializing in working to improve benefits to disabled veterans, something the neo-cons would prefer we not even think about.

The conservative Chicago Tribune and the Daily Herald both endorsed her.

The utterly odious, vile incumbent, Joe Walsh decided that swift boating was a great idea. I might add that this cretin was a radio personality who suggested we secure the Mexican border with a moat and alligators.

He tried to lower the boom on Duckworth in July 2012, at a campaign event, when he accused Duckworth of politicizing her military service and injuries, saying “my God, that’s all she talks about. Our true heroes, the men and women who served us, it’s the last thing in the world they talk about.”

The woman missing  two legs and one arm. It’s pretty hard not to notice. Even for a TeaPublican.  

National and Virginia News Headlines: Monday Morning

4

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, July 20.

*No alternative for Iran nuclear deal, Kerry says (Grammar/usage question: shouldn’t that headline say “no alternative TO Iran nuclear deal?”)

*US, Cuba Re-Establish Full Diplomatic Ties

*“Why Only Now?”: Media Ask Why Trump Drew GOP Candidates’ Ire For McCain Remarks, But Not Anti-Immigrant Rants (And why only when a Republican’s war service is belittled, not when a Democrat’s – John Kerry’s or Max Cleland’s, for instance – is denigrated by Republicans?)

*Krugman: Europe’s Impossible Dream

*Donald Trump: No apology to McCain, vows to stay the course (BTW, when are Republicans going to apologize for denigrating/”swift boating” John Kerry’s military service and heroism? Oh, that’s right, it’s ok if they do it to a Democrat…)

*The most terrifying thing about GOP abortion politics: Jeb Bush is considered a moderate (Jeb’s only “moderate” relative to how far right the Republican 2016 presidential field is.)

*Editorial: Virginia sets bad example on film subsidies (“Given the cold, hard facts about the return on such investments, it would be interesting indeed to hear Virginia’s Republican lawmakers explain why that makes any kind of sense.”)

*Our view: Is religious liberty also discrimination? (“Republicans have announced that the “primary focus” for legislative action in the next session will be what they call the protection of religious liberty in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that found that same-sex marriage is a constitutionally protected right.”)

*Region struggles with cancer, obesity (“Basic math shows expanding Medicaid would improve the state’s budget and make hospitals financially healthier. Federal taxes Virginians already pay would cover almost all of that. It would also improve access to the kind of early and regular medical intervention necessary to combat colon cancer and diabetes, saving the lives of countless Virginians each and every year.”)

*For decades, a Confederate flag flew at Norfolk Naval Shipyard

*Police in Prince William prepare to use body cameras

*Ruckelshaus: Progress too slow toward a cleaner bay (“Now comes the hard part: getting thousands of individuals to make changes in how they manage their farms, parking lots, septic tanks and lawns. Reducing that pollution will benefit all of the states’ water quality, upstream and downstream.”)

*Nine minutes of obfuscation (“For nine full minutes of a video released last week, Fairfax County Police Chief Edwin C. Roessler Jr. stared into a camera and delivered a bland recap of the in-custody death of Natasha McKenna, the 37-year-old woman who died Feb. 8 after sheriff’s deputies at the county jail shot her four times with a Taser stun gun. And for nine full minutes, Mr. Roessler, who announced the police investigation is finished, managed to reveal absolutely nothing.”)

*Confederate flag rally in Richmond draws supporters and protesters

*Greinke shuts down Nats

*A blistering start to the week before a bit of relief arrives Wednesday

Jeff Schapiro: “Public bravado notwithstanding,” Virginia Republicans “are scared – very scared”

5

It is often the case that the most interesting read in the Sunday papers about Virginia politics comes from Jeff Schapiro of the Richmond Times-Dispatch. Today is no exception, with his column, House Republicans’ nightmare scenario. Here are a few key points, with my thoughts, quibbles, etc.

*“Republicans stand a strong chance in November of holding the Virginia Senate, if not expanding their majority.”

Given the makeup of Virginia’s off/odd-year, which strongly favors Republicans, I sadly must agree with this analysis. I believe the analysis I did last August largely still holds: Dems need to hold all their incumbent districts, including some potentially tough ones (John Edwards, who is facing a Republican and a Dem-turned-independent; Chuck Colgan – who is retiring; possibly Lynwood Lewis, who only won by 11 votes in his last election), while picking up at least one seat (the best shots are the seat of retiring Sen. John Watkins in the Richmond area, and also the seat of crazy Sen. Dick Black in Loudoun/Prince William Counties). Democrats will also need to overcome Republicans’ initial money advantage. Again, it’s doable, but it’s not going to be easy.

*Schapiro argues that two issues — a review of parole and the Planned Parenthood “fetal organ-harvesting video – secretly made by abortion foes” — could “energize” the Republican vote this November.

I mostly don’t see that happening. For one thing, the right-wing base is almost always riled up about something or other, and a review of parole doesn’t seem to be of the magnitude to increase that significantly. As for the Planned Parenthood video, it’s hard for me to imagine that will be a big deal come November, especially since it really has nothing to do with Virginia politicians per se, and also because most Virginians presumably support the vast majority of work Planned Parenthood does – pap smears, mammograms, breast scancer screenings, HPV tests, birth control, and even abortion in most cases.

*Schapiro argues that the potential for court-ordered House of Delegates redistricting, combined with elections in November 2016, are “Speaker Bill Howell’s nightmare.”

Agreed. That would be the “perfect storm” against Howell, given that the electorate in a presidential year is almost COMPLETELY different (and far “bluer” than in the usual odd-year elections for House of Delegates) and could really put a dent in his 68-32 majority.

*How much of a dent? Schapiro notes that there “are 27 Republican-held House districts that Obama won in 2012 or lost narrowly” and implies that most or all of these districts could be competitive in the scenario noted above.

I agree to a point. By my count, there are 19 (not 27) Virginia HoD districts that were won by Barack Obama and/or Tim Kaine, yet are currently held by Republicans. I’d say that in the scenario outlined above – redistricting plus a November 2016 election for House of Delegates – Democrats could pick up a “slew” of seats, as Jeff Schapiro argues, just not quite as large a “slew” as 27 seats. A more realistic prediction, IMHO, would be 10-15 (actually, that’s probably too optimistic, although Schapiro also says “ten or a dozen seem possible,” so who knows), assuming great recruiting by Democrats, funding of those candidates, and a strong (3-5 points or more?) Democratic victory for president here in Virginia. That would potentially get Dems from 32 seats to 42-47 seats in the House of Delegates, within striking distance of 50, and definitely a force that the Republicans couldn’t just ignore or roll over at will, as they can now.

*Finally, Schapiro implies that Bill Howell himself could be vulnerable, given that “Obama got 49 percent in his district in 2012.”

Let’s hope that happens, and good riddance to the ALEC tool if it does.

Bernie Sanders 2016: VA House Parties, July 29, 2015

0

Wow!!!!!!

Bernie sanders packed over 11,000 supporters last night for his town hall meeting last night in Phoenix, Arizona!  Sanders continues to exceed expectations, tapping into a vein of economic populism not seen in decades.  But a lot of work remains to be done!  

Bernie Sanders 2016 is organizing house parties on July 29, 2015 across the country.  To date, 1,800 house parties have been set up from coast to coast.  

In Virginia, there are 53 house parties and counting across the state arranged by volunteers on the ground in the following communities:

Abingdon

Accomack

Alexandria

Arlington

Blacksburg

Chesapeake

Charlotesville

Chiccoteague

Dahlgren

Falls Church

Franklin

Floyd

Fredericksburg

Front Royal

Harrisonburg

Independence

Lanexa

Lynchburg

Matthews

McLean

Melfa

Midlothian

Norfolk

Poquoson

Reston

Richmond

Roanoke

Salem

Sterling

Tazewell

Urbanna

Vienna

Warrenton

Williamsburg

Wise

Woodbridge

Yorktown

Wise

If you would like to attend a house party or arrange your own house party, use the link below to connect to the Sanders campaign website:

https://berniesanders.com/

Here are links to various Facebook pages across the state set up by volunteers across the state of Virginia:

https://www.facebook.com/pages…

https://www.facebook.com/NoVaF…

https://www.facebook.com/VA4Be…

http://www.meetup.com/Virginia…

#FeelTheBern!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO BERNIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

National and Virginia News Headlines: Sunday Morning

9

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, July 19.

*How did this monster get created? The decades of GOP lies that brought us Donald Trump, Republican front-runner (“Donald Trump did not happen overnight. He’s the product of a dangerous, cynical GOP strategy that dates back years”)

*GOP rivals blast Trump over McCain comment (Popcorn!)

*The Trump Campaign’s Turning Point

*O’Malley and Sanders interrupted by Black Lives Matter protesters in Phoenix (“Netroots Nation session derailed as crowd chants over speeches”)

*Bernie Sanders Holds Biggest Rally of His Campaign (“more than 11,000 people…in Phoenix”)

*Bill Cosby in His Own Words: Sex, Drugs, Deceit

*Schapiro: House Republicans’ nightmare scenario (“There are 27 Republican-held House districts that Obama won in 2012 or lost narrowly.”)

*Redistricting could alter Virginia’s political landscape (“A special session to redraw Virginia’s congressional districts could give Gov. Terry McAuliffe the power to hold out for a new map that turns at least one additional seat to the Democrats.”)

*20 years after parole ends, Virginia takes up the issue again

*Skeens: Here’s what failure to expand Medicaid looks like

*Editorial: Richmond needs to be in Amtrak loop

*Va. crowd rallies for new memorial that honors slaves, Union soldiers

*Virginia Beach called weak on illegal immigration

*Regulators want another new path for pipeline in Nelson County (“Federal regulators want the Atlantic Coast Pipeline to consider another route for the proposed natural gas pipeline that will not affect either a pending historic district or a state wildlife management area in southern Nelson County.”)

*Casey: On the Confederate battle flag and Roanoke’s Christmas parade

*A day after being left in dark, Nats and Dodgers split a pair in the summer sun

*Steamy Sunday could go down as hottest day of the year so far