Home Blog Page 2071

President of Virginia Advanced Energy Industries Coalition Demolishes SCC’s “Shoddy Work”

0

Somehow I missed this op-ed in my morning news roundup, but it’s a must-read for anyone who cares about Virginia’s energy and economic future. The following are a few key points by Virginia Advanced Energy Industries Coalition (VAEIC) President Francis Hodsoll regarding the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC)’s recent “analysis” (using the word VERY loosely!) of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. Note that the mission of VAEIC is to “[promote] open markets for clean and secure advanced energy technologies in order to create jobs and position Virginia as a magnet for talent and innovation in the advanced energy sector.”

*”[N]eighboring Mid-Atlantic states [have] created 290,000 clean energy jobs while Virginia [has] stood still.” Crazy.

*Even crazier is that the Virginia SCC is now “aggressively trying to block the creation of entire new clean energy industries” in our state. What on earth? To put it mildly, this is “a strange position for an agency with a mission that includes improving public service and providing objective, timely and expert assistance.”

*The SCC’s recent “analysis” of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan is, among other things, “inexplicably flawed and error-filled” (e.g., “the SCC assumed that Virginia would cut pollution in the most expensive way possible – building a new nuclear plant, with a price tag above $20 billion”).

*How flawed is the SCC’s analysis? Example: their “analysts” falsely claimed “that the EPA ignores the costs of retiring old, dirty power plants that will be retired anyway.” In fact, “over 60 percent of that [coal-fired] generation capacity – 1,796 megawatts – was already going to be mothballed” anyway. And, Hodsoll adds: “The remaining retirements represent just 4 percent of total state electricity needs. That’s something basic energy efficiency and clean energy can easily replace.”

*The SCC also ignores a few important facts: ” Solar modules costs have plunged 80 percent since 2008. Wind turbines costs are down 29 percent. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates solar dropping another 12 percent this year.” That’s why corporate America is scrambling to build solar power – “because it makes economic sense” right now (and even more so every year that goes by).

*Now here’s the truly insidious part. “Not only did [the SCC] ignore the facts, its staff aggressively publicized this ‘report.’ The only rationale I can assume is this anti-growth, anti-business community ‘report’ was meant to force Gov. Terry McAuliffe to turn away from a $1 billion a year opportunity to create jobs and save consumers money.” It’s truly outrageous, and the SCC “staff members who wrote this document should be called to account.”

I’d just add that the corporate media, with a few exceptions, has utterly failed on this one. Instead of just parroting a deeply flawed “analysis” by an agency “led” by a bunch of pro-coal Republicans, the media should have done its job and critically analyzed this hit job by a deeply politicized agency with zero credibility. As for Gov. McAuliffe, he should file the SCC’s “analysis” where it belongs – the ol’ “circular file.”

It’s Never Over in Virginia

4

( – promoted by lowkell)

The dust has settled over the Commonwealth after election day 2014, and Mark Warner will survive to serve out another six years in the Senate … assuming he stays that long. But there’s no end to campaigns in Virginia, which because of our odd-year election cycle hosts heated elections every calendar year. For instance, with newly elected Congresswoman Barbara Comstock, there will soon be a special election for the 34th House of Delegates district. Other special elections will be held in the 4th district (Southwest Virginia, to replace newly elected State Senator Ben Chafin) and the 63rd district (Petersburg, to replace newly elected State Senator Rosalyn Dance) — but don’t expect any surprises there. Here’s a preview of what to look forward to in Virginia politics.

34th House of Delegates Special Election

Let’s give a brief history of the 34th in the last few election cycles. In 2007, Republican incumbent Vince Callahan retired and the open seat was won in a good Democratic year by Margi Vanderhye. Margi had defeated Rip Sullivan in the Democratic primary (Rip is finally making his way to Richmond from the 48th District). I wonder if Rip’s pleased that he didn’t end up in the 34th, as in 2009 a Republican tsunami swept out Vanderhye by 422 votes.

When Vanderhye lost by the narrowest of margins, Bob McDonnell was winning the district with 53.47% of the vote. Vanderhye was able to run ahead of Creigh Deeds at the top of the ticket, but not by enough to win. With redistricting, Republicans padded Barbara Comstock’s margin by a few points, and she won reelection in 2011 by a 54.8%-45.1% margin over Pamela Danner. Comstock didn’t need the redistricting help then, but she certainly did in 2013, when she narrowly defeated Kathleen Murphy by only 422 votes.

Where have I seen that number before?!

In 2013, the statewide Democratic ticket was sweeping at the top in the 34th. Comstock had to run ahead of her conservative clown car nominees in order to sneak out a narrow victory. But unlike in 2009, she had built up enough of her own brand to swim against the tide.

We saw that again in 2014, as Comstock ran ahead of Gillespie in the 10th District by four percentage points. Mark Warner won 51% in the 34th District, better than Obama’s narrow 49.79% win in 2012, but behind Tim Kaine’s 53%. In her own district, Comstock ran ahead of Gillespie by seven percentage points. These are discouraging numbers for Democrats hoping to knock her off in 2016, as it indicates she may have the political skills to run ahead of the Republican Presidential nominee.

In the upcoming special election for Comstock’s House of Delegates seat, Democrats have a chance to pick up a House of Delegates seat that they must win if they ever want to retake the majority. The Democratic nominee will face a grueling calendar, having to run again in next fall’s state legislative elections. But I think the Democrats start with a solid floor in the special election. This district does not swing wildly back and forth; statewide Democrats (including Deeds) do better in minimizing drop-off here in low turnout odd years compared to other districts further out in the more diverse suburbs and exurbs. It also means that the district, unlike other parts of Northern Virginia, did not swing towards Obama as the electorate grew more diverse in 2012. It has a small but stubborn swing vote, the small pool of Romney-Kaine voters that may also explain Comstock’s ability to survive in 2013.

Demographics is not going to hand the 34th to Democrats. We have to win it on our own. It may be now or never for us.

Redistricting

Virginia’s Republican members of Congress are challenging the ruling which orders the state to redraw its Congressional lines and reverse the racial “packing” of minority voters into Bobby Scott’s 3rd District. A higher court may overturn the ruling, and there’s plenty of time for more mischief to occur.

What could happen is anyone’s guess. Unpacking the 3rd could spill over to the 1st, 2nd, and 4th, easily. Making the 4th a more diverse district would assist Democrats in taking out Randy Forbes, but others believe that if forced to redraw the lines the General Assembly Republicans are more likely to throw David Brat under the bus.

Drawing a metropolitan Richmond district, essentially recreating the old 3rd CD represented by Thomas Bliley before the 1990 redistricting, would create a sharply difference district today given trends in the area. The seat would vote Democratic in all but the worst years and be well over one third African American. State Senator Donald McEachin has been discussed as a likely candidate for Congress in the future, with or without this redistricting.

The problem for Virginia Republicans is that drawing the existing 3rd district as a more compact minority-majority district in Hampton Roads wouldn’t leave enough for both Rigell and Forbes. Virginia Beach and Chesapeake, their respective home territories, are too close and too isolated. Given the population centers, two Districts with fair minority representation seem likely: a Richmond-based one and a Hampton Roads-based one. Which one is the actual minority-majority district could depend on the balance of the white suburbs and who gets more of the Petersburg and Southside area. This blows open the 4th, and I haven’t seen a plan yet that doesn’t give Forbes a clear seat to run in… but I’ve been thinking about one (stay tuned!).

Right now, as the legal fight continues, Governor McAuliffe will have to decide if he wants to sign off on a Republican quick fix, or hold the line and veto anything that falls short of meeting certain benchmarks for transparency and fairness.

2015

Democrats are backed into a corner, with few pickup opportunities in the State Senate. The 2014 election gives cause for concern, as low-turnout affairs in this political climate are mostly being won by Republicans. Democrats will need to seize on an issue to rally our base. Will it be Medicaid expansion?  

There are only two Republican-held State Senate seats won by Obama in 2012: the 7th (Wagner, Virginia Beach) and the 10th (Watkins, Richmond suburbs). Obama narrowly lost in the 13th (Black, Loudoun and Prince William), the 17th (Reeves, Spotsylvania and Central Virginia) and the 20th (Stanley, Danville and Southside Virginia). Tim Kaine narrowly won in the 17th. It is hard to see justification for competing in seats beyond this handful, and even then they are arguably a real reach.

With limited opportunities for offense, Democrats will be playing defense in several seats: the 1st (Newport News) and the 33rd (Loudoun) in particular. Strong turnout by Miller and Wexton could assist the House of Delegate candidates in at least four winnable seats in the fall.

2016 and Beyond

The odds of Mark Warner ever becoming more than just the Senior Senator from Virginia dipped significantly after his electoral scare. But with Tim Kaine near the top of everyone’s short list for VP, or a cabinet position, Governor McAuliffe may be be given the opportunity to appoint a new Senator sometime in 2016 or 2017. While this could avoid a bruising Ralph Northam-Mark Herring primary fight for governor in 2017, something tells me that the political forces are going to work behind the scenes to resolve the line of succession before it comes to that. Northam in particular should be worrying about Herring’s higher visibility in the key fights in the Commonwealth. I think McAuliffe may look elsewhere for a Senate appointment…

[poll id=”

139

“]

Virginia News Headlines: Monday Morning

3

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, November 10.

*Joaquin Castro, Joe Kennedy considered to run Democratic comeback campaign

*Here Comes the Sun: America’s Solar Boom, in Charts (Solar power is booming!)

*Officials rush for backup plans to HealthCare.gov

*Post-Election, Obama Says The Blame Is on Him (Partly, but a lot of the blame also goes to Democratic political strategists at the DNC/DSCC/DCCC, on campaigns, etc.)

*Breitbart’s Attack On Obama Attorney General Nominee Goes After The Wrong Loretta Lynch (Of course, “Breitbart” is an utter farce, but its readers probably have no clue.)

*Gillespie cut Democratic margins in population centers

*Special session convenes today at General Assembly to work on transportation funding (Watch out for monkey business from Bill “ALEC” Howell and Company!)

*Chuck Todd to Eric Cantor: How Does Repealing Obamacare Count as Common Ground? (Any assault on the Affordable Care Act, as opposed to strengthening it, would be highly confrontational, not to mention irresponsible.)

*Cantor: Obama ‘incendiary’ on immigration (Amazing. Remember, the Senate has passed a bill with nearly 70 votes, but Republican “leadership” in the House has not allowed it to come to a floor vote, even though there’s almost certainly a majority for passage. Now who’s being “incendiary” again?!?)

*Cantor: Democrats have no bench for 2016 (Cantor should talk about his own party’s 2016 field, which is an utter freak show.)

*John Whitbeck of Loudoun seeks to chair Republican Party of Virginia (Yep, it’s the far-right-wing, anti-Semitic “joke” dude.)

*Today’s Top Opinion: Warning letter (This is one of the most f’ed-up editorials, even by the Republican Times-Disgrace editorial boards’s extremely low standards for truth. Just lie after lie about the Clean Power Plan. Which is weird, because even the RTD admits that global warming is happening and calls for a carbon tax, which they know Republicans – and fossil fool Democrats – in Congress won’t allow.)

*They Like Me, They Really Like Me (“Ed Gillespie, Facebook and the near-upset of the year.”)

*Pleasant start to the week, but brace for a sudden – and chilly – turn

Democratic Denial

11

( – promoted by lowkell)

Never underestimate the power of denial.

Democratic excuses for last Tuesday’s election disasters are pitiful. Placing blame on President Obama’s leadership or the vagaries of mid-term elections ignores the election of a Republican governor in Maryland, a Republican state house in Minnesota and the near-defeat of Democratic businessman Mark Warner in Virginia. Democrats now control fewer state legislative seats than at any time since the Civil War. Republicans are on a long march to dominate American politics – and Democrats are to blame.

Two statistics are all we need to know. First, median household income in America continues to fall. It is down 10% since 2000, with no sign or recovery. Second, the employment rate of Americans aged 18-65 is also down 10% since 2000. It also continues to fall.

Middle-class, working Americans live in economic turmoil. Their vision that a middle-management career would provide a home in a good neighborhood, college tuition, vacations, healthcare and retirement suddenly evaporated along with middle-management. Millions of Americans, reared in the pre-planned Industrial Age, are ill-equipped to realign their skills with the fluid expectations of the Information Age. As our economy continues to evolve this problem will endure.  

Republicans offer a solution: less government; lower taxes. This is a terrible solution; trickle-down economics don’t work and deregulation just gave us the Great Recession. However, the Republican “solution” is politically preferable to the Democratic solution – which doesn’t exist.

In the 1960s, a common bumper sticker read, “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.” Average Americans may not demand that government create jobs, but they understand that taxes and regulation impact job creation. They understand that one-third of the job force has given up trying to find a job. They understand that average working Americans earn 10% less today than 15 years ago. They understand that the Democratic Party has no strategy for aligning government action with economic growth.

The measure of merit in political economics is not the Dow Jones Industrial Average – it is median household income. Democrats must convey a clear and concise strategy for middle-class driven economic growth. When the Democratic Party proves its dedication to this standard it will regain the votes of America’s middle class.

Ed Gillespie for Senate 2018? Barbara Comstock for President 2020?

12

Does that headline seem far-fetched? Crazy even? It certainly would have seemed far-fetched, if not crazy, a few weeks ago. But how about today, after Gillespie nearly pulled off one of the biggest political upsets of the year, and possibly the greatest in Virginia political history (I’d rank Dave Brat over Eric Cantor at the top of the list in recent history)? How about after Comstock not only defeated, but utterly crushed (by 16 points) a well-funded, popular Democrat in a “swing district?” A few points to consider.

*Comstock is just 55 years old and, by all accounts, highly ambitious. Can anyone seriously picture her as a “lifer” in Congress?

*In her campaign this year, Comstock demonstrated an ability to bring together all wings of her party, attract independent voters in the above-mentioned “swing district,” and steamroll to victory. Since then, she’s been touted as one of the big Republican winners of 2014. Do you think someone with Comstock’s ambition isn’t going to be seriously think about, and be seriously courted for, higher office going forward?

*Comstock also has ties to some of the biggest names, biggest $$$, and most influential voices in both the Republican Party and the right-wing echo chamber (e.g., Sean Hannity, Mark Levin).

*Let’s say Hillary Clinton wins the White House in 2016 against whoever the Republicans nominate. That means 2020 will be wide open, with Republicans looking for someone who can bring their party together and take back the White House. Could a three-term Congresswoman (assuming Comstock’s reelected in 2016, she should then easily win in 2018 as well) from the crucial state of Virginia, a woman no less, be someone Republicans might turn to for President or Vice President in 2020? Of course, it’s a long way off, and a lot of things can happen before then, but it seems highly plausible to me, as long as Comstock keeps doing what she’s been doing. And no, that doesn’t make me happy in the least, because I view her as dangerous and extreme.

*As for Ed Gillespie, my money’s still on Mark Obenshain getting the 2017 Republican nomination for Virginia Governor. If so, then the next realistic opening for Gillespie would be U.S. Senate in 2018, when Tim Kaine comes up for reelection. That’s assuming, of course, that Kaine’s still in the Senate, as he’s widely considered on the “short list” for VP in 2016.

*In that latter scenario, where Kaine moves up to Vice President in 2016, Gov. McAuliffe would appoint someone to fill the vacancy temporarily. According to Virginia Code:

When any vacancy occurs in the representation of the Commonwealth of Virginia in the United States Senate, the Governor shall issue a writ of election to fill the vacancy for the remainder of the unexpired term. The election shall be held on the next succeeding November general election date or, if the vacancy occurs within 120 days prior to that date, on the second succeeding November general election date. The Governor may make a temporary appointment to fill the vacancy until the qualified voters fill the same by election.

*So, if I’m reading this right, it’s possible there could be an election in November 2016 or November 2017 for U.S. Senate. In that case, change “Ed Gillespie for Senate 2018?” to “Ed Gillespie for Senate 2016 or 2017?”

Anyway, there’s no doubt this is all mostly navel gazing at this point, but I just wanted to throw it out there to put on your radar screens.

Virginia News Headlines: Sunday Morning

4

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, November 9.

*U.S. airstrike targets leaders of Islamic State

*GOP 2016 hopefuls jockey for position after midterms

*What Happens After the Red Wave? Predictions for the Next 18 Months in Washington (“Mitch McConnell has spent six years obstructing everything in sight, and there’s no special reason to think that’s going to change. John Boehner has spent the past four years in a wholly futile attempt to make his tea party crazies see reason, and there’s no reason to think he’s suddenly figured out how to do it.”)

*Here Is What Will Happen If The Supreme Court Strikes Down Obamacare’s Subsidies (Nothing good, that’s for sure.)

*The GOP’s poisonous double-speak: Thomas Frank on how Republicans hijacked the midterms (“Once again, Republicans used their patented brand of fake populism to make Democrats look like chumps”)

*How Environmental Groups Are Reacting to Tuesday’s “Miserable Fucking Failure” (“Climate deniers won big in the midterms. So where do green groups go from here?”)

*Health insurance exchange opens for 2015 enrollment

*Push bubbling up to block gas tax increase (“There’s a potential opening on the issue Monday because the legislature is going to tinker with the state budget during a reconvened session largely focused on electing various judges.”)

*The election that might have been (“Why does Hampton Roads vote 54% for Sen. Mark Warner, and return three Rs and one D to the House?”)

*With new Congress, region is losing clout (“With the new Congress, Virginia will gain 3 new members but lose 71 years of seniority.”)

*Gillespie’s strong showing in Senate race boost’s Virginia GOP’s confidence

*Close Senate race could have aftershocks in Virginia politics (“It also has sent a warning shot to Democrats about the importance of motivating their base voters such as minorities and college students to turn out in nonpresidential elections.”)

*Schapiro: Republicans’ not-so-odd couple (“Gillespie and Obenshain have a future in Republican politics – if they can change the way Republicans practice politics. That may lend itself to a Gillespie-Obenshain alliance. It has promise for both men. It also is fraught with peril.”)

*Our view: Kasich (“Here’s a modest proposal: Virginia’s Republican legislators don’t have take the word of our Democratic governor on Medicaid expansion. They don’t even have to take the word of prominent business lobbies. Instead, they should invite in the Republican governor of Ohio to explain why it makes good business sense.”)

*Landowner rights vs. public need in battle over pipeline route

*Pipeline opponents seek to influence FERC decision

*Va. Beach councilman wants inquiry into mayor’s actions

*A warming trend in store before temperatures take the plunge

For any Democrat delusional enough to think Tuesday wasn’t a disaster

12

I’ve actually seen a couple high-ranking Virginia Democrats argue that Tuesday wasn’t so bad, that to say it was a disaster is an overreaction or whatever. For instance, DPVA Chair Dwight Jones sent out a Panglossian email which actually asserted, with no apparent irony or self awareness, “Today is a good day for Virginia Democrats” (in what conceivable universe, parallel or otherwise, would that be the case?!?), that we had “so many great races and Democrats made the party proud, regardless of the outcome” (uhhh…examples of “great races” please?) and that “as we saw in our races, when the party is able to effectively communicate with its base, Democrats win” (actually, what we saw was the opposite – when Democrats disrespect/ignore the base, run away from/fail to tout their own accomplishments, adopt Republican framing, offer no comprehensive econoimc vision for the future, play the false equivalency/”both sides” game, etc., etc, they get their butts kicked). To this utterly delusional “thinking,” I present this article.

A couple choice quotes:

*”The more serious problem for Democrats is the drubbing they’ve taken in the states, the breeding ground for future national talent and for policy experimentation. Republicans have unified control – the governorship and the legislature – in 23 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Democrats control just seven. Democrats hold 18 governorships, but only a handful are in the most populous states.”

*”Without prominent statewide elected leaders, Democrats are in danger of seeing their state party structures atrophy. This has happened in Texas over the past two decades, ever since Republicans seized control of the politics of the state.”

Think about it, both nationally and right here in Virginia. For instance, in 2009 and 2011, Virginia Democrats were wiped out in the House of Delegates, dropping from 44 to 32 seats, and losing a bunch of really good people (e.g., Margie Vanderhye lost to…yep, Barbara Comstock; Chuck Caputo lost to Jim LeMunyon; Joe Bouchard lost to Chris Stolle). Today, we remain basically decimated in the House of Delegates, while Republicans like Barbara Comstock are on their way to Congress. ugh. In 2010, we lost rising star Tom Perriello. In 2013, we managed to pick up a net of ZERO House of Delegates seats, again leaving us decimated in that chamber. So much for our “farm team.” Same thing nationally, sad to say. So how was this past Tuesday anything but an unmitigated disaster? Got me.

Is Jay Fisette Correct to Compare to Columbia Pike Streetcar Opposition to Climate Science Denial?

5

Over at ArlNow, Arlington’s Democratic politicians are busy struggling to figure out what happened on Tuesday, with Republican/”Independent” John Vihstadt not just defeating, but crushing by 12 points, Democrat Alan Howze for County Board. As ArlNow noted, what made this outcome so stunning was that Vihstadt “became the first non-Democrat elected to the County Board since 1983… winning 39 out of 52 Arlington precincts, even though every one of those precincts chose Sen. Mark Warner (D).”

So, something clearly went badly, even horribly, wrong for Arlington Democrats on Tuesday. But what exactly? Most people are pointing fingers at two things: 1) the apparently unpopular Columbia Pike streetcar project, opposition to which Vihstadt made a centerpiece of his campaign (while Howze supported it); and 2) hostility towards the County Board majority (Democrats Jay Fisette, Walter Tejada, Mary Hynes), due to a perception that they haven’t been listening and/or respecting people’s wishes on the streetcar and other projects; that they have not been spending money wisely; etc.

So, what message did Arlington County Board Democrats take from Tuesday’s debacle (which they apparently didn’t expect, even as some of us – ahem, Ben Tribbett and me, for instance – have been warning for months that this could happen)? One reaction that’s stirring up a s***-storm at ArlNow — 250 comments and counting so far – comes from Arlington County Board Chair Jay Fisette, a strong streetcar supporter (along with his fellow board members Mary Hynes and Walter Tejada, both of whom are up for reelection in 2015).

“I think there has been a lot of focus in the last year on that issue,” Fisette said after the ADCDC meeting. “This community has such a history of being thoughtful and policy-oriented … Here on this issue, what has been created and what we see at the moment is a lack of even agreement on some fundamental core facts about the issue.

“It’s almost like climate change,” Fisette continued. “Is it based on science that it’s true, or is it not?”

The reaction to that comment at ArlNow has been, basically, outrage, with the top-rated comment pretty much summing it up: “Did Fisette just compare streetcar skeptics to climate change deniers? Really? Wow.”

So, outrage aside, was Jay Fisette correct to compare Columbia Pike streetcar project opposition to climate science denial?

Short answer: IMHO, no. Longer answer: IMHO, no, for a variety of reasons.

First off, let’s just stipulate that global warming is an issue that’s about 1 gazillion (that’s a 1 followed by a gazillion zeroes!) times more important than the Columbia Pike streetcar project, or just about any other issue frankly. Why? Because global warming poses the only truly existential threat to life on this planet and civilization as we know it, short of full-scale thermonuclear war or a massive asteroid slamming into Earth. So…just like you don’t want to violate “Godwin’s Law” by comparing contemporary problems to Hitler or the Nazis, you probably also shouldn’t really be comparing basically inconsequential (in the grand scheme of things) issues like the Columbia Pike streetcar with the enormous, existential, planet-wide threat of global warming. Just saying…

Second, the fact is that climate science is one of the most widely-studied, theoretically-sound, data-supported, rock-solid realities on this fine planet of ours. I mean, basically, if climate science isn’t true, then we might as well toss out evolution; gravity; viruses and bacteria causing disease; water freezing at 32 degrees Fahrenheit; and the earth revolving around the sun while we’re at it. There’s just no doubt about it; the only questions are how bad it will be, how fast it will unfold, what to do about it, stuff like that.

In stark contrast, while there are certainly facts behind the Columbia Pike streetcar project – such as where it will run and how it will be funded – other than that there’s a lot in dispute, a lot that’s more opinion than anything else, a lot that we can take guesses at (e.g., the return on investment to this specific project) but don’t really “know” in the same way science works. For instance, will the streetcar bring in $3.2-$4.4 billion “in development over the next 30 years in Arlington and Fairfax counties, triple the amount that would be triggered by improving bus transit, according to a consultant’s study?” Or will it bring in a lot less than that, as streetcar opponents claim? Personally, as a streetcar supporter, I am strongly inclined towards the former estimate (plus, I have no particular reason to believe that the study which found billions of dollars in return on investment from this project is flawed), but that’s a far cry from the overwhelming evidence (CO2 readings in the atmosphere, changes in temperatures in the air and the oceans, rising sea levels, ice cap shrinkage, you name it) in support of climate science.

Next, as a political matter, let’s face it: calling someone a climate science denier is a highly unflattering thing to say, and in my view should be reserved for actual climate science deniers, who more than deserve the opprobrium for their idiocy, lunacy, etc. In the case of the Columbia Pike streetcar project, while I don’t agree with the opponents on almost anything, and while I question their repeated, false statements (e.g., that Bus Rapid Transit is possible on Columbia Pike despite the absence of a dedicated lane, which it most certainly is not), I’m not sure how essentially equating them to climate science deniers is either going to win them over or prevent them from being even ANGRIER at County Board supporters like Jay Fisette, Mary Hynes and Walter Tejada.

Finally, also as a political matter, I’m not at all convinced that repeatedly telling your constituents – many of whom are from your own political party – that they are “misinformed” is the best way to win them over. Yes, I agree that John Vihstadt et al. have used inflammatory, even demagogic language on the streetcar and other issues (“Gold-plated aquatic center?” Seriously? It’s really plated in gold? Whatever.). And I agree that streetcar supporters should keep putting the facts out there. But ultimately, if voters are rejecting what you’re saying – which they have now clearly done, resoundingly, two elections in a row – perhaps it’s time to ask deeper questions?

For instance, why is it that Arlington voters appear to have lost confidence in the County Board? What’s fueling all the mistrust and even anger at the Board? Why do so many people keep saying that these folks are “arrogant,” “insular,” “non-communicative,” “aloof,” etc? Are there things the Board should be doing differently (other than calling their opponents climate science deniers, that is – heh)? And perhaps really cutting to the chase: with elections for two of Jay Fisette’s County Board allies slated for next year, is this type of rhetoric helpful politically, or for that matter substantively, in terms of getting the desired outcome (in this case, from Jay Fisette’s perspective, that would be helping reelect his allies Mary Hynes and Walter Tejada to the Board next year)? Just a few thoughts for a lazy, post-disastrous-election Saturday afternoon.

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

4

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, November 8.

*Mitch McConnell Says His Top Priority Is To ‘Get The EPA Reined In’ (And everyone else’s priority should be to make sure McConnell fails the next two years, then to replace him as Majority Leader in 2016.)

*BREAKING: Supreme Court To Hear Case Seeking To Gut Obamacare (Not good, I hope the Obama adminstration has a workaround for when the right-wing hack Supreme Court justices try to gut this law on an utterly absurd reading of the fine print.)

*Obama firmly rejects GOP warning that he hold off on immigration action (It’s hilarious to hear John Boehner, who has singlehandedly blocked the bipartisan Senate immigration bill in the House from even getting a vote, say ANYTHING about this. President Obama should have done this months ago!)

*Obama’s choice for U.S. attorney general breaks new ground

*Obama’s big mistake with Latinos (“The president should have done what he thought was right on immigration.” Absolutely, why the heck didn’t he?!?)

*The falling jobless rate and spineless Democrats (“Yes, I know. The map was bad for Democrats defending seats or running for open seats in deep red states that hate Obama. But there was a great story to tell and ‘fraidy-cat Democrats locally and nationally refused to tell it.” Pathetic.)

*What happened to Mark Warner? (“‘This is a base turnout state now,’ said one strategist who wondered why Warner was spending time on the trail with a white, 87-year old Republican ex-Senator instead of bringing in African-American surrogates for the final push.” Yep.)

*Ed Gillespie: No plan to run for Virginia governor (It would be better for Democrats if Mark “Criminalize Miscarriages” Obenshain were the nominee, so that’s good news.)

*Our view: Virginia made history 25 years ago today

*Forcible sex offense reports increase at flagship universities in Virginia, Maryland

*Sessoms’ Council Votes Helped Bank Borrowers (“Virginia Beach mayor’s actions may have violated state law” — Lucky for Mark Warner this news didn’t break a week or two ago, as Sessoms endorsed him for reelection.)

*Gillespie concedes ‘hard-fought race’ for U.S. Senate in Virginia

*Efforts to clean up Lafayette River taking hold

*Report: Va. guardsman punished for abuse allegation

*Va. attorney general: No referendum on streetcar unless it’s a bond issue

*Gordon Peterson, fixture of D.C. area news to leave WJLA at end of year (Can’t blame him for wanting to leave this increasingly right-wing station.)

*McAuliffe: Virginia, partners to save 277 acres of 10 Civil War battlefields

*Coat-and-glove weekend weather to turn milder as Veterans Day nears

The Democrats Should Come Out Swinging

8

The Democrats lost not because they were wrong but because they were weak.

They were weak in their fighting. And they were weak in presenting the values and the kind of America they stand for.

How else but by Democratic weakness can we explain how raising the minimum wage keeps winning by large majorities with support from people who then go vote for Republicans who have fought to block such a raise?

How else can we explain that voters unhappy with the failures of Congress to take care of the people’s business will vote for politicians who made it their priority to see to it that Congress could not take care of that business?

The people have bought a raft of lies, and the Democrats have been too weak to make the liars pay a political price.

Now the bullies of the right are coming forward to bully the Democrats some more. This we saw yesterday when the Republican Speaker of the House spoke contemptuously of the President of the United States in a way we Americans are not supposed to talk about a president.

Speaker Boehner warned President Obama against “poisoning the well” (by taking an executive action the Republicans don’t like). No one would drink from it anyway after what the Republicans have thrown into it these past six years.

Will President Obama let himself be bullied? Will the Democrats in general respond to their rejection by the voters by acting deferential to the victors?

God, I hope not. That’s the last thing we need for the Democrats to do.  

The Republicans were hardly deferential in 2009 when they came out of their second straight rebuke from the voters. And in that case, the Republicans had pretty well called the shots for eight years, and the mess they were rejected for was of their own making.

Now the Democrats have been rebuked. The people are not happy, and understandably so. But what has made the people unhappy is mostly the result of deliberate Republican choices to sabotage our political process.

And now they’ve been rewarded for it once again (see 2010).

If the Democrats apologize for policy positions that might have taken the country forward, if they take the position of supplicants seeking compromise with people who disdain compromise, then the despicable and unAmerican tactics will have been rewarded once again.

No, we cannot have that. The Republicans have pressed the battle since Obama was elected. The Democrats, in their weakness, have hurt themselves by being out-messaged and out-fought one more time this fall.

Let this new Congress, which is so ugly to contemplate, with for example a climate denier (James Inhofe) becoming chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, become the inspiration not for surrender, but for the Democrats finally swinging like they mean to get a knockout.

Call out whatever the Republicans do that would have made our Founders cringe. Call out whatever they do that a Dwight Eisenhower or Barry Goldwater or even a Ronald Reagan would have thought dishonorable.

Put forth a vision of how American can move forward, and tie that vision to the issues over which the struggles ahead will be fought. FDR inspired people with a liberal vision of the greater good. Is there any reason American liberalism, in this time of widening inequalities and other injustices, cannot put forward a powerful vision again?

Press the battle for the minds of the people who went into the voting booth this past week and handed more power to the disgraceful party the Republican Party has become.

Go forward with executive action on immigration. Take every measure to available to deal with climate change, including standing firm against the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Press the battle. That is what this nation desperately needs.

It’s no time to give in to bullies.

The Democrats should come out swinging.