Home Blog Page 2394

Why I Am Supporting Mark Herring for AG

7

(This is excellent, thanks very much to Lloyd Snook for posting it here! – promoted by lowkell)

A recent Not Larry Sabato story on fundraising in the Democratic AG race prompted me to think out loud about the Attorney General’s race.  

First, let me start by expressing a bias — I am really tired of Democrats running for Attorney General as though the Attorney General is the top prosecutor in the state.  I am tired of it for three reasons:

1.  It isn’t true.  The United States Attorney General is the top federal prosecutor; our federal criminal system puts the Attorney General in charge of every United States Attorney everywhere in the country.  That is not the deal in Virginia, where prosecutorial powers are primarily given to the local Commonwealth’s Attorneys, with no supervision from Richmond.

Our Attorney General’s prosecutorial powers are laid out in just one section of the Virginia Code — Va. Code section 2.2-511(A), which sets out 14 specific instances in which the Attorney General can prosecute.  Six of those require the concurrence of the local Commonwealth’s Attorney.  In all other cases, the Code says, the AG only gets involved in criminal cases on appeal.  Most of what the Attorney General does is to run a large law firm (the AG’s office) that handles mainly civil cases.

2.  In the long run, it’s really bad politics.  Republicans have been arguing since at least Richard Nixon’s time that they are the party that is “tough on crime.”  When we campaign for AG within that frame, we are fighting on Republican turf.  So not only are we at a competitive disadvantage, but this sort of campaign guarantees that no one ever argues to the public for smarter, rather than just tougher, criminal laws.  When we fight the battle on Republican terms, we enshrine that prosecutorial view of the office in the public consciousness.  

3.  In the short run, it doesn’t work.  Remember Steve Shannon in 2009?  He talked about having helped to create an Amber Alert network, and he promised that, if elected, he would personally go to court to prosecute Internet predators.  His campaign ads built on the Amber Alert program and seemed to say, “Be afraid.  There are child predators around every corner.”  If he said anything else in 2009, I don’t remember it.  And we saw how that turned out.  

Now that I have that rant out of the way, here’s the point of this post — I have recently decided to support Mark Herring.  Here’s why.

We have a group of Democrats in Charlottesville who get together weekly for lunch; Mark joined us a few months ago, and Justin joined us a few weeks ago.  As far as I can recall, those occasions were the first time that I had met either.  Both are impressive guys, in different ways and for different reasons.

Herring is an experienced candidate and office holder; he worked his way up through Loudoun County to where he is now — a State Senator. He has practiced law in a civil firm in Leesburg for more than 20 years.  He gives a fairly traditional stump speech — long on Cuccinelli-bashing, “it’s time to get politics out of the AG’s office,” with some awareness that the Attorney General is not the top law enforcement officer of the Commonwealth. He gives off the sense of being a very solid guy, and someone who would make a solid Attorney General. His website has a lot of discussion of issues, most of them civil issues like voting rights protection and consumer protection. None of it is ground-breaking stuff — but at least he is not trying to emphasize crime fighting and scaring Virginians.  

Justin Fairfax is a young guy who has an impressive resume. Duke undergrad, Columbia Law and Law Review, clerk for Judge Gerald Lee, then to WilmerHale in DC for 4 years before going to the U.S. Attorney’s office for 2 years.  This is the resume of someone on a fast track.

Judging by his website, I get the impression that he is concerned about people realizing how inexperienced he is.  You have to go to his LinkedIn page to get the details of how long he has worked where, or even to get a sense of his age (apparently about 35, judging by when he graduated from high school).  

Overall, his website has the feel of a padded resume. Just one example — one picture caption reads “Star federal criminal prosecutor Justin Fairfax announced his campaign…” If you’re going to call yourself a “star federal criminal prosecutor,” you should be able to point to at least one case tried, one conviction garnered. I have never heard anything about any conviction that he obtained.  

I got polled tonight by a woman from a group that was obviously working for Fairfax, and she asked me if it would be convincing to me that he had gotten over 100 convictions, and that he had gotten a conviction in a child trafficking case involving the notorious gang MS-13.  I didn’t know either asserted fact, and I tried to Google “Justin Fairfax” and MS-13 — nothing came up.  Not even his own website says that.  If you Google his name — just all by itself — nothing comes up but political references.  If you search the Washington Post website, the only mentions of his name are in connection with this race.

When Fairfax came to talk to our lunch group, we were impressed — he is clearly an intelligent, articulate and ambitious guy.  The argument that he makes for himself comes down to two points:

1.  He is “the only former federal prosecutor in the race.”  I have said above why I think the “prosecutor” argument is absolutely the wrong argument to make.  And why should it be important that he is a former federal prosecutor?  When we asked him whether he had learned anything in particular about what makes federal trials different from Virginia state trials, it was pretty obvious that he didn’t know anything about Virginia state trials.

2.  On the politics, he argues that the only way to win in 2013 is to attract young minority people to the polls, which he says he can do. Someone asked him, “Your claim to fame is that you are a former narcotics prosecutor, where most of the people you put in jail were young black people. Why should young black people see you as someone for them to back?” He didn’t really have an answer.

The Democrats’ 2001 experience suggests that Fairfax’s political argument is weak; people rarely come out specifically to vote for the bottom of the ticket.  Don McEachin was the African-American Democratic candidate running for Attorney General, and even in heavily African-American areas like Petersburg (-5%) and Norfolk (-10%), he trailed Mark Warner.

So I am not sure that the affirmative case for Justin Fairfax’s candidacy holds water.

But we were also struck by the fact that he was trying really hard to duck difficult issues of the kind that he will actually have to deal with as AG.  On almost every tough question — the death penalty, prison reform, drug legalization — he answered with some variant of “That’s a conversation we need to have.”  That’s the answer of someone who is not ready for prime time.  I don’t want to know that you think we should talk about it; I want to know that you know enough about the issue to have a position of your own.  

As I said above, both Herring and Fairfax are impressive guys.  They both bash Ken Cuccinelli persuasively.  They both express their support for women’s reproductive rights, for voting rights, for getting the AG’s office out of the culture wars, etc.  They are both intelligent and articulate.  Fairfax has more rhetorical flair than Herring; Herring speaks from a greater depth of knowledge about Virginia issues and the ways of Richmond.  

Justin Fairfax struck most of us as someone who could turn out to be a talented political figure, but who should start his political career at a rung a bit below Attorney General.  

Mark Herring struck most of us as someone who is ready to be Attorney General now.

NRA to Congress: Make the Mentally Ill Take a Chill Pill, Not Us

0

Largely without a voice in the corridors of power across the nation’s legislative institutions, America’s ‘mentally ill’ have become a focal point in an attempt to make sense of some of the violent acts that have been perpetrated over the last few years. Most recently, the letters believed to be covered with ricin sent to the White House, a judge in Tupelo, Miss., and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss), are believed the be the actions of a “mentally ill” man who’s “paranoid and thinks people are out to get him” when not on his medication.

But studies ranging back decades clearly show that mental illness is no more an indicator of conducting a violent act than not having a mental illness. For a host of reasons, however, the media and the public’s attention is all too often focused on this group of individuals as the scourge that has wrested away the relative peace that had heretofore been perceptibly known. That is, the mentally ill have become a scapegoat, the easy target, for some of our society’s deeper problems.

For me, this issue is personal. A number of individuals in my family as well as a number of friends have ‘mental illnesses’ and I suspect a number of Blue Virginia readers also know someone with a mental illness too (who doesn’t these days!?). These individuals are, on the whole, some of the kindest, most virtuous, and big-hearted individuals I have ever known. They are, in other words, great people, and not one medical relapse away from acting out in a manner harmful to others or themselves.  

In the wake of the Newtown killings, the legislation on mental illness that followed [with the support of groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA)] was a clear sign of the direction that a number of America’s legislators are ready to go down for the sake of political expediency, face-saving action, and a feel-good legislative bandage that will almost certainly do more good than harm. The NRA, in particular, seized on the idea that ‘it’s not the guns that kill’, it’s the individual (the mentally ill individual).

The cosmic irony is, of course, that groups like the NRA, continue to sell, without abandon, their killing machines while living, breathing, sentient beings are set one step closer to an insurmountable stigma in our country. Mental illness is not the problem, however.

The problem is a society that doesn’t know how to take a collective step back and search dispassionately for a deeper cause of actions like the Newtown killings. We react to the tune of special interests, and in so doing, we create far more problems than we had before while subsequently burdening further the lives of those individuals whose political voices cannot be heard over the blaring gun shots of the NRA and other powerful special interests.  

NRA to Congress: Make the Mentally Ill Take a Chill Pill, Not Us

0

Largely without a voice in the corridors of power across the nation’s legislative institutions, America’s ‘mentally ill’ have become a focal point in an attempt to make sense of some of the violent acts that have been perpetrated over the last few years. Most recently, the letters believed to be covered with ricin sent to the White House, a judge in Tupelo, Miss., and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss), are believed the be the actions of a “mentally ill” man who’s “paranoid and thinks people are out to get him” when not on his medication.

But studies ranging back decades clearly show that mental illness is no more an indicator of conducting a violent act than not having a mental illness. For a host of reasons, however, the media and the public’s attention is all too often focused on this group of individuals as the scourge that has wrested away the relative peace that had heretofore been perceptibly known. That is, the mentally ill have become a scapegoat, the easy target, for some of our society’s deeper problems.

For me, this issue is personal. A number of individuals in my family as well as a number of friends have ‘mental illnesses’ and I suspect a number of Blue Virginia readers also know someone with a mental illness too (who doesn’t these days!?). These individuals are, on the whole, some of the kindest, most virtuous, and big-hearted individuals I have ever known. They are, in other words, great people, and not one medical relapse away from acting out in a manner harmful to others or themselves.  

In the wake of the Newtown killings, the legislation on mental illness that followed [with the support of groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA)] was a clear sign of the direction that a number of America’s legislators are ready to go down for the sake of political expediency, face-saving action, and a feel-good legislative bandage that will almost certainly do more good than harm. The NRA, in particular, seized on the idea that ‘it’s not the guns that kill’, it’s the individual (the mentally ill individual).

The cosmic irony is, of course, that groups like the NRA, continue to sell, without abandon, their killing machines while living, breathing, sentient beings are set one step closer to an insurmountable stigma in our country. Mental illness is not the problem, however.

The problem is a society that doesn’t know how to take a collective step back and search dispassionately for a deeper cause of actions like the Newtown killings. We react to the tune of special interests, and in so doing, we create far more problems than we had before while subsequently burdening further the lives of those individuals whose political voices cannot be heard over the blaring gun shots of the NRA and other powerful special interests.  

Sign Mark Herring’s Petition Calling for Federal Investigation into Star Scientific Scandal!

0
Mark Herring for Attorney General

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

HERRING LAUNCHES PETITION ASKING VIRGINIANS TO JOIN HIS CALL FOR A FEDERAL INVESTIGATION INTO MCDONNELL, CUCCINELLI AND STAR SCIENTIFIC 

Leesburg – Today Senator Mark Herring (Loudoun and Fairfax) launched a petition to give Virginians a chance to voice their opinions on the scandal surrounding Governor Bob McDonell and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s financial relationship with the company Star Scientific and its CEO Jonnie Williams Sr.

The petition, which can be found at www.HerringForAG.com/InvestigationPetition, reads:

“Virginians deserve the whole truth about McDonnell, Cuccinelli, and this big GOP donor. Mark’s calling on the U.S. Justice Department to launch an independent investigation into this scandal. But he needs you standing with him. The only way we’ll get the whole truth is with a large public outcry.”

On April 11, Senator Herring called for the Public Integrity Section of the United States Department of Justice to investigate the relationship. A copy of the letter Senator Herring sent can be found on the campaign website, www.HerringForAG.com/HerringLetter.

“Virginians deserve to know the truth about the financial relationship between Bob McDonnell, Ken Cuccinelli and the tobacco company Star Scientific. Cuccinelli continues to deny he has done anything wrong even though he failed to disclose $10,000 worth of stock options in the company while defending the state against Star Scientific. Governor Bob McDonnell continues to remain quiet and dodge the issue about the $15,000 catering bill Star Scientific paid for. Virginians deserve to know the facts and that’s why we need an independent investigation,” Herring said.

The Star Scientific scandal involving McDonnell and Cuccinelli continues to grow. Last weekend,The Virginian-Pilot joined the call for an independent investigation, saying, “In the absence of another way to begin an investigation, federal or local authorities appear to be the best hopes for getting to the bottom of the matter.”

Join Mark Herring in Alexandria on Monday

0

From the Mark Herring for AG campaign:

 

 
Mark Herring for Attorney General

Dear Lowell,

My campaign will be stopping in Alexandria on Monday April 22nd, and I wanted to invite you to join me for an informal Meet & Greet so that I can share with you my vision for the Attorney General’s office.
 
What:  Meet & Greet with State Senator Mark Herring, Democratic Candidate for Attorney General
When:  Monday April 22, 2013 at 7:00 pm
Where: Ramparts Tavern and Grill, 1700 Fern St., Alexandria, VA, 22302
 
Please click here to RSVP.

I hope to see on Monday.
 
Thank you for your support,
 

Mark Herring

Follow on TwitterFollow on Facebook

 

Paid for and authorized by Mark Herring for Attorney General

Mark Herring for Attorney General
PO Box 6201

Leesburg, VA 20178 

Aneesh Chopra Receives a Slew of Mayoral Endorsements

0

From the Chopra for LG campaign – congratulations!

 

Mayor Dwight Jones of Richmond joins other Virginia mayors in endorsing Chopra for Lt. Governor
 
ARLINGTON, VA — Today the Mayor of Richmond, Dwight C. Jones, and other mayors across Virginia endorsed Aneesh Chopra for Lt. Governor of Virginia. 
 
“Aneesh is uniquely qualified to take on the challenges that face the next Lieutenant Governor of Virginia and I know that he's got what it takes to deliver real results for Virginians,” Jones said. “I know that Aneesh shares my vision for creating jobs and building a sustainable economy though investments in education and workforce development. I can appreciate his commitment to building an economy that invests in the jobs of the future.” 
 
“As a former resident, Aneesh experienced all the wonderful things our city has to offer and is committed to making sure that we protect the James River, create jobs to get Richmonders back to work, and make sure that all of our children have an equal opportunity to succeed,” Jones continued. “I am working every day to help build the best Richmond, and I know I will have a great partner in Aneesh as the next Lieutenant Governor of Virginia.”
 
Mayor Jones joins the following current and former mayors in endorsing Chopra's candidacy:
  • Kim Adkins, Mayor of Martinsville
  • David Brown, Former Mayor of Charlottesville
  • William Euille, Mayor of Alexandria
  • Joseph Fitzgerald, Former Mayor of Harrisonburg
  • Joan Foster, Former Mayor of Lynchburg
  • Satyendra Huja, Mayor of Charlottesville
  • Earnie Porta, Mayor of Occoquan
  • Larry Rogers, Former Mayor of Harrisonburg
  • Blake Caravati, Former Mayor of Charlottesville
  • Kristen Umstattd, Mayor of Leesburg
Mayor William Euille of Alexandria remarked, “I was impressed with Aneesh Chopra’s service for Governors Warner and Kaine, and I know he’ll bring the same energy to the Lt. Governor’s office. He knows the problems we are facing and will confront them head-on with innovative solutions.”

“I’m supporting Aneesh Chopra for Lt. Governor because he’s got big ideas for moving the Commonwealth forward,” said Mayor Satyendra Huja of Charlottesville. “His experience, vision, and energy are second-to-none.”

Mayor Kim Adkins of Martinsville said of Chopra, “my takeaway from conversations I have had with Aneesh Chopra is he will use his position as Lt. Governor to be part of the solution to spur and sustain economic growth in Southern Virginia. He is a pragmatic problem-solver; and I am looking forward to working with him upon his election.”

“No one brings greater know-how and experience to the Commonwealth than Aneesh Chopra,” said Mayor Kirsten Umstattd of Leesburg. “His focus on family, on education, on job creation, and on positioning Virginia for the future is second to none.”

On receiving these endorsements, Chopra released the following statement:

 
“I am honored to have the endorsement of Mayor Jones of Richmond and other mayors and former mayors from across the Commonwealth. As I travel across Virginia, it's clear that people want to turn the page on divisive politics and instead focus on solutions to our biggest challenges. I am excited to work with Mayor Jones and elected officials across Virginia to move us all forward.”

Today's endorsements follow the announcement earlier this week that Congressman Gerry Connolly (D – 11th) has endorsed Chopra for Lt. Governor. 

Cuccinelli Makes First Smart 2013 Play: LaCivita Lives?

0

by Paul Goldman

Tomorrow, 200-proof politics will have an analysis of the 2013 GUV race published in a highly respected national venue for such op-ed columns. It was written prior to GOP candidate Ken Cuccinelli’s decision to release 8 years of his tax returns. The op-ed is not written from a tactical point of view, focusing on a strategic aspect of national importance.  

But tactical moves can be as important, depending on where the “play” fits on the chess board. We find the decision to release 8 years of tax returns curious, as opposed to all the years when he was in public office, a more defining line perhaps. However, it does appear Virginia columnists, Democrats and others are missing the “play” here from Cuccinelli.

It is not about getting Terry to release his tax returns in hopes of finding something. Cuccinelli’s campaign guy, Chris LaCivita, a tough player who rose to fame with the “Swift Boating” of John Kerry in 2004, has proven that he only needs stuff freely available over the Internet. Truth v. fiction v. whatever, the political game has been reduced to the lowest common denominator. Almost anything passes the “smell” test right now. If the tax returns have some other stuff, Chris will not mind. But he has all the stuff he feels he needs right now to do what he has been hired to do. So does Terry’s side. This is not a kid’s game.

So what’s the tactical play then? It is getting the media to prove it doesn’t have a double standard in the election. And as we have said before: You can’t disprove a negative by words alone. You got to walk the walk.

Or put another way: Cuccinelli’s political guy realizes his candidate can’t win right now. Why? In the end, campaigns are competing entities to come up with the best “narrative” on the “choice” before the voters.

Wilder ran in 1989 using the slogan “We have come too far to turn back now.” Warner and Kaine took it and reshaped it to their own use. It has been the best Dem argument for 25 years: We are the party of the New Virginia, the other side is the Old Virginia. When Republicans crack that narrative, they have won. When they can’t, they have lost. It is a winning argument, all other things being equal, because it appeals to key swing voters.

Cuccinelli’s strategy guy has figured this out: The Mainstream Media are “all-in”  24/7 saying Cuccinelli will take us back. There is nothing Cuccinelli can do to change their view. Even the GOP Richmond Times Dispatch has broken with Cuccinelli over “gay rights”, feeling he will take the state back. Cuccinelli seems to almost want to give the press fodder for this analysis. He wears the label as a badge of honor. It makes no political sense. But it is what it is.

So Chris LaCivita knows one thing: He can’t win if the mainstream media has their foot on Cuccinelli’s neck, making it impossible for him to get off the canvass. And he can’t win if his candidate seems almost wanting to dare the mainstream media to push this narrative. .  

His tactical option: He needs to figure out a way to “discredit” the media narrative with his guy’s help! That ain’t easy. He doesn’t have a lot of choices. For example, Cuccinelli refused to go after the for-profit schools where the Post is vulnerable. By letting the Post off the hook, he has basically let the mainstream media in the state off the hook.

By continuing to play AG – and having politically tone-deaf people make his decisions for him in that office – Cuccinelli has hurt himself repeatedly this past months. But again, he doesn’t seem to care.

Thus leaving LaCivita: The tax return issue, never used before in Virginia, unclear whether anyone cares. But last year, the Mainstream media insisted that Romney release his tax returns. So did Democrats. Indeed it was the mainstream media that drove the story if you go back and look.

Was it a major factor in the end, the tax returns? No. But it did drive the narrative for a while. It gave the media something to hit Romney on and the Obama campaign. Remember: It wasn’t until the 47% video fiasco that Romney actually did “feed the beast” by releasing enough tax stuff to force them to stop demanding more. So the tax thing went on for months, and the Obama campaign used it smartly to keep Romney off his feet when need be.

One thing I do know about the VA media: They believe they are fair and balanced. They will do a lot to protect that image. If Cuccinelli is believed to be making progress cracking that image, the media will react to prove he is wrong. They will go after Terry just to prove their fairness. Terry’s tax returns are no one’s business, I said that about Romney. But it is 200-proof politics time now for a GUV candidate.

My prediction: Unless Cuccinelli’s tax returns blow up in his face, Terry will follow Romney and release some tax returns.

Why? Because if he doesn’t, it goes against his narrative of being a pragmatic business guy who will move things forward and not let the state be held hostage to stubborn political ideology. And because by not doing it, he puts the mainstream media in a no-win posture. They will have to hammer him on something to prove they are being fair. Why risk their picking on a more damaging issue because the are out to prove something? Too risky.

And because, on balance, Cuccinelli took the low-hanging fruit. This was the easiest issue for him. So why not give it to him and move on? The longer you wait, the greater the chance your refusal gets trapped by current events and you are faced with a lot riskier political decision. he press is no candidate’s friend in the final analysis. They play be different rules.

It is all about risk vs reward. Terry should release his taxes on May 1, when Virginian’s have to pay their taxes. Put out how much he has paid in VA taxes over the years. That will answer Cuccinelli and also show Terry’s connection to Virginia. The next day, Terry hits Cuccinelli on something big or makes a big announcement of support.

As our piece shows tomorrow, the 2013 election isn’t going to be decided on these kinds of sidebar issues unless the political guys for each side make a big miscalculation.  

Mark Warner – I will no longer support you

9

(Mark Warner richly deserves this not just because of his egregious votes yesterday, but for his constant bashing of progressives, for his support of mountaintop removal coal mining and the Keystone XL pipeline, etc. Also note, I added the photo, courtesy of DonkeyHotey’s Flickr stream. – promoted by lowkell)

Mark Warner voted against the assault weapons ban. Mark Warner voted against limiting the size of magazines. Mark Warner is the most popular political figure in Virginia, and could have voted for both measures without in any way jeopardizing his reelection in 2014

Mark Warner is from a state that saw the slaughter at Virginia Tech.  Cho used both ten and fifteen round magazines for his two handguns.  Think how much damage he did.  Think how much more he might have been able to do had he had 30 round magazines and had to change less frequently.

I have been involved in Democratic politics in Virginia including at a statewide level. Mark Warner is considered the 800 pound gorilla of Virginia Democratic politics. In a sense my taking this stand may make me toxic in Virginia politics.

I don’t care.

It does not matter that neither of these amendments were going to pass. I rely on the words of Martin Luther King, Jr.:

There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right.

It matters not to me whether Mark Warner believes the baloney of the gun lobby or merely lacks the guts to stand up for what is right.  What is right is to stop the slaughter.

If you are unwilling to step up to that, I am unwilling to offer you my support, my money or my vote.

President Obama Strikes a Blow in the Wake of the Senate Failure

5

( – promoted by lowkell)

Immediately after watching the President’s forceful remarks after the Senate failed to pass the gun bill, I posted, with some enthusiasm, about his statement:

He spoke about the willful lies from the gun lobby. He spoke about 90% of Republicans voting against something 90% of the American people want. He spoke about the abuse of the filibuster rule.

I’d have had him stress these points more than he did, but he did come out swinging. Which is what we need from him.

Stand and fight.

Then I got to wondering:  maybe Obama should have given some of that speech BEFORE the vote, rather than after. By talking about how the gun lobby was “willfully lying,” and how the Republicans were poised to thwart the will of the American people, perhaps he could have changed the field of forces enough to get the bill passed.

Maybe he could have. But then I saw that doing it AFTER, as he did, was what I would have advised.

Why? Because the bill itself was not all that much of an accomplishment. Yes, it would constitute “progress,” but very minor progress: how big a deal could it be if Wayne LaPierre was all for it back in 1999?* Besides which, even if it passed in the Senate, how likely was it that it could get past the Republican-dominated House?

So getting the bill passed through the Senate isn’t something that should be given overwhelming weight.

On the other hand, USING THIS FAILURE TO STRIKE A BLOW against the destructive force– that’s important.

My guess is that President Obama was thinking that way in coming up with his strategy.

If one looks at his remarks, they are strongly geared to the idea of people getting passionate enough, and organized enough, to influence the elections coming up. All the talk was about the gun issue, and changing the nature of the political forces on the politicians. But the EFFECT would inevitably be broader.

If we replace all those politicians who vote with the willful liars on this issue, we drain away Republican power. My guess is he went out there thinking not just of the gun issue, and not just of the Senators who voted wrong, but of 2014 and the need to end Republican control of the House of Representatives.

After all, what can be accomplished in this country so long as John Boehner’s caucus has to sign off on any legislation that gets enacted.

Striking the blow using an issue on which 90% of the American people are on the president’s side is good. But the blows of this sort have to keep coming, which means that he cannot require that kind of overwhelming public support on every issue that he employs.

But choosing the long-term politics over the immediate legislation looks to me like the strategically right choice.

* I would like to ask: why is it that LaPierre and the NRA worked to defeat in 2013 what we can see on video that LaPierre supported in 1999? My guess is that a good answer would tell us something important about what’s happened in the realm of politics –about the rise of the “It”– in the intervening fourteen years.

Andy Schmookler, an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher, was the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia’s 6th District.  He is the author of various books including The Parable of the Tribes:  The Problem of Power in Social Evolution.