Home Blog Page 2415

Top Cuccinelli Backer Compares Women’s Health Rights to “Returning Slaves to their Owners”

4

From the Democratic Party of Virginia:
  
Richmond, VA – Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is getting big support from anti-women's health group The Susan B. Anthony List and its President Marjorie Danenfelser.
 
The group has pledged $1.5 million to Cuccinelli's gubernatorial campaign and touts him as one of the greatest hopes for their agenda of eliminating a woman's right to make her own health care choices, even in cases of rape, incest and a threat to the woman's health.
 
The enormous benefit Cuccinelli is reaping from running on an agenda so closely aligned with the Susan B. Anthony List's raises the question of whether he agrees with the statements below, made by Dannenfelser during a panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference, where Cuccinelli was a speaker as well. Speaking of the movement to eliminate women's health care rights Dannenfelser said:
 
"We have all the ingredients of the child labor movement success, the suffrage success, the abolitionist success. We have all the elements. There's one thing that could be missing, and it has been, and that's a champion. We must have a champion on the national level that communicates this. I think we're actually watching that happen.
 
"But at the point . there's a point when you become culpable in the killing of other people, because of what the government is making you do. And that is one of those tipping point moments-tipping point moments. It happened in slavery when slaves had to be returned to their masters. When we-when our hands are bloodied by this, it becomes a whole 'nother thing."
 

Democratic Party of Virginia Executive Director Lauren Harmon responded to these remarks saying, "Ken Cuccinelli should condemn his backer's ridiculous and offensive comparison of a woman's constitutional right to make her own health care choices with the atrocious institution of slavery. Virginians need to know that, despite his close ties to this radical organization, Cuccinelli rejects this awful rhetoric. He should condemn it today."
 
Several minutes after making her outrageous comments, Dannenfelser reiterated her strong support for Cuccinelli's campaign, saying, "I've heard people talking about the governor's race in Virginia and we feel that's the first step and a template for what we do in midterm elections. We need to get it right, we need to show not only how well a candidate can do in articulating the issue, but also how advantageous it will be in the outcome in making sure that those votes don't leave the table."

Exclusive Interview: DPVA Chair Charniele Herring

10

I had the opportunity yesterday to sit down with Democratic Party of Virginia Chair, Del. Charniele Herring, for an hour-plus discussion/interview in Alexandria on turning Virginia blue, on winning in 2013, on building the state party and Virginia Democrats’ “farm system,” etc. Thanks to Del. Herring for her time; I greatly appreciate it. Here are some highlights from our discussion.

1. According to Del. Herring, the 2009 elections in Virginia were a case of conservatives mobilizing, in the aftermath of their defeat in 2008, “to their benefit,” while Democrats basically went to sleep. For instance, Herring won her January 2009 special election, in the solid blue 46th district (Alexandria), by just 16 votes, as Democrats “were tired” and didn’t go vote. Later that same year, as we all know, Democrats were wiped out for governor, LG, AG, and the House of Delegates. The lesson: “every vote matters,” and also we can’t ever go to sleep or take anything for granted. Certainly, we’d better not do either of those things in 2013, unless we like the thought of saying “Governor Cuccinelli” for 4 years. Nope, didn’t think so.

2. Del. Herring said we’ve been recruiting candidates for 2013, are doing pretty well, but frankly “candidate recruitment is a long-term thing; we’ve got to build a bench.” Of course, Herring pointed out, it’s the House Democratic caucus that is primarily responsible for candidate recruitment for the House of Delegates, while “the party does supplement and provides support” (e.g, voter file, media training, messaging, research, helping to identify donors). According to Del. Herring, “through time we’re going to figure out a better way for candidate recruitment,” but it’s certainly “not easy,” as a lot of people don’t want to go through what it takes to run for office. The bottom line, in Del. Herring’s view, is that it’s going to take time to get back to where we need to be in the House of Delegates: “I think what we need to do is be in a place that in 2020, that we have some control of redistricting…it’s slow building, I can’t sit here and say that we’re going to pick up 10 seats in 2013…we have to just realize the reality of our situation…it’s going to have to be slow, methodical, and deliberate.”

3. According to Del. Herring, in the 2013 campaign, “We’re not going to be duplicating things, which has happened in the past, where the coordinated campaign runs outside the party; everything’s going to be run through the party, so that’s going to help our House of Delegates candidates, the top of the ticket and on down…a unified front.” In other words, this time around, things have to be done differently if we expect different results from the past (if not, it’s the classic “definition of insanity” – doing the same thing and expecting different results), and Del. Herring seems determined to make sure that happens.

4. What are the major issues for 2013? Del. Herring believes that part of it will definitely be pointing out how extreme (“outside the norm of what we’ve known conservatives to be“) the Republican ticket will be on issue after issue. As much as Cuccinelli tries to “normalize himself,” Democrats will need to keep reminding people of how extreme Cuccinelli’s record is and “what he truly is and what he will do if he were to be elected.” We’re also going to hear about transportation, jobs and the economy, women’s reproductive health care, climate change, the assault on science, LGBT equality, the Republican assault on voting rights, etc.

5. In Del. Herring’s view, we can’t just be against Cuccinelli, “we have to promote ourselves, we are…a party of ideas that are fact based, evidence based, reality based…we’re a big tent party…that brings Virginians to a better quality  of life overall no matter their party affiliation,” and we have to talk about all that. In addition, of course we need to remind people of all the extreme things Cuccinelli has said and done. At the same time, the case for Terry McAuliffe will center on job creation, pursuing opportunities like clean energy, keeping Virginia an attractive place for businesses and individuals to live in, being a welcoming place for all people. In Del. Herring’s view, businesses are highly – and legitimately – concerned “about the extremism” of Ken Cuccinelli; “if you’re going to have laws that discriminate,” you’re going to drive talented people away.

6. I asked Del. Herring about the large financial advantage held by the Republican House caucus over the Democratic House caucus and what we can do about that. Part of it, in Del. Herring’s view, is “pooling resources together.” Part of it is tapping into national donors, new donors, potential opportunities with members of the business community who are not comfortable with Ken Cuccinelli. Part of it is that Democrats in deep blue areas need to “step up our games” in terms of raising money for Democrats in competitive/”purple” districts around the state.

7. On the transportation bill, Del. Herring is doubtful that Gov. McDonnell will veto it, but she does think he’ll make changes, possibly with the hybrid fee. We should know the answer to that question within about a week. Del. Herring said her vote for the transportation bill was one of the most difficult she’d ever taken, but she’s concerned about “simple public safety” (e.g, bridges falling apart), and this is the “first time in a generation that we actually were able to get something done,” albeit “not perfect.” Also, if we don’t take care of transportation, Del. Herring believes (and I agree) that Virginia’s business ranking will continue to fall. If Ken Cuccinelli’s elected, this will only get worse; we could fall 9-10 slots in the business rankings, join “some of the more regressive states…that’s what I’m concerned about…it’s ridiculous.”

8. On the role of the state party, Del. Herring believes we need to be constantly working on the ground to develop talent, keeping in touch with voters, working to “maintain our relevance,” “building the bench,” developing “long-term sustainability,” and definitely not just parachuting in at the last minute (e.g., right before an election). This will take a “long-term vision,” looking at our successes and also what we can improve on. Del. Herring sees this as a long-term commitment and definitely plans to be there “for another four years” after her run for reelection this June. The plan is geared towards 2020, towards keeping a continual effort going between elections, “not just sitting in Richmond.” Del. Herring specifically mentioned keeping people in place and being in the community, a la Howard Dean’s 50-state strategy. She also noted Dean’s recommendation to “go out and door knock when you’re not asking for a vote,” the importance of asking people what their concerns are. Bottom line: “We do have a strong case [to make], we’re in a good position, people are energized…and it’s our job to keep [people] energized and focused.”

9. I asked Del. Herring how she viewed bloggers – as enemies, frenemies, friends, or what. She immediately and enthusiastically responded, “friends!” She also said that bloggers’ role is “crucial” in that newspapers read the blogs, that social media “makes a difference and mobilizes people.” “I don’t want it to be adversarial…media makes a difference…politicians have to be amenable to it…you’re connecting with more voters [if you use social media effectively].” Del. Herring definitely sees herself as “grassroots” (“I am such not the insider…I’m an outsider…I am not part of any machine.”). Her background comes out of being homeless as a teenager, living in a shelter when she was 16, and getting into college with the help of the STEP program (“that’s why I believe in government programs…Republicans want to slash it…they’re slashing my future and the future of America”). Without those programs, “my options would have been so limited.” This is about providing citizens with opportunities to move up, giving people chances for social mobility (“I do not want a governor whose willing to be successful and leave other Virginians behind, and that’s what Cuccinelli is about”).

10. Finally, Del. Herring talked about the process for selecting a new Executive Director for DPVA. She said she did a national search, was looking for someone with a diverse experience – fundraising (“that fundraising component that she brings with her and her contacts with national donors is important to me…she has that fundraising experience that will be helpful for us to grow as a party”), political organizing, field, etc., and she feels like she found it in Lauren Harmon.

Again, it was great catching up with Charniele Herring as she settles into her new job as DPVA chair. I hope to do more of these in the future.

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, March 19.

*Can Priebus remake the GOP – and himself? (Anyone out there holding their breath?)

*How Three Top Republicans Are Already Blowing Up The RNC’s Minority Outreach Strategy

*Republican National Committee Plan: More Money In Politics, More Influence For Rich People

*It’s The Policy, Stupid: 4 Policies That Undermine The GOP’s New Voter Outreach Strategy

*Poll Tracks Dramatic Rise In Support for Gay Marriage (Also see Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Marriage)

*Why the Upset? On the History Channel Jesus is a White Surfer Guy and Satan Looks Like Barack Obama

*Sequestration: Cuts are already threatening House seats (Good, but I just hope people remember that Republicans are 90% responsible for this, so should get 90% of the “credit” at the polls this November.)

*The Grand Old Punt (“Republicans are reluctant to travel the hard road to revival.”)

*GOP looks to Virginia governor race as test run for party changes

*Climate activists urge Warner to reject pipeline

*Herring files petitions for AG, other Va. candidates endorsed

*Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation

*2 likely candidates for Virginia governor provide their positions on uranium mining

*Cuccinelli to be featured speaker at Shad Planking

*FOIA records of A.G. Cuccinelli’s work schedule cost $3,677

*ACLU urges McDonnell to sign drone ban bills

*Following fear to a dead end (“A heritage designation for the Virginia home of traditional mountain music had no land-use strings attached.”)

*PolitiFact: Gun group gets ‘Pants on Fire’ rating

*More then 6,800 sign petition against alternate-fuel vehicle tax

*The Washington Post to charge frequent users of its Web site (I wonder what the Ombudsman has to say about this. Whoops, I almost forgot, the Post axed their Ombdusman to save money and stifle a critical voice. Oh well.)

*VCU basketball success boosts region

Bombarding Reason, the Conservative Strategy for Winning the War of Ideas

1

When I take a step back, give myself a chance to breathe, and take a deep look at our current political environment, the contours of certain political groups become even more ghastly in their utter disregard for compassion, understanding, respect, and the like. Many of these groups, or at least the individuals who comprise these groups, assembled at what has been crowned “CPAC,” otherwise known as “Careless People Attacking Coloreds.” Okay, you got me, that’s not really what CPAC stands for. CPAC stands for “Conservative Political Action Conference” (no, I won’t hyperlink to their website!).

But in a sense, that is really what CPAC stands for, attacking people of color, attacking established science, attacking society’s disadvantaged. America has seen this before, though. America has always had political groups and individuals who just can’t get enough of ‘the way things were’, of an imaginary and ideal past that America has unmoored itself from.

What’s so disturbing about CPAC and its faithful adherers in our own time is the sheer toxicity and hatred that is infused in so many of the speeches, statements, comments, and one-liners AND the amount of mainstream support that is either passively or actively given by Americans.  

Former Attorney General for George Bush, Michael Mukasey, had the following to say while seated at a CPAC panel:

“You may not be interested in Islamism, but Islamism is interested in you… The vast majority of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims adhere to a view of their religion that agrees on the need to impose Sharia, or Islamic law, on the world.”

Aside from where Mr. Mukasey got his statistics from, the mere fact that most of America seems to shrug its shoulders or even nod its head in agreement at such comments is a rather disturbing phenomenon.

Now, I myself have no statistics to say this or that many Americans agree with this or that CPAC statement. I’m basing my conclusions off of the discussions I’ve had and overheard with many folks from many walks of life and it’s staggering just how little opposition statements like Mukasey’s arouse in many of these interactions. It’s staggering just how much many of these biases exemplified by Mukasey’s statement above have appeared to seep into the minds of even some of the most fair-minded Americans.

If conservatives are not winning overwhelmingly at the polls, they seem to be winning on the ideas front by the sheer loudness and quantity of their hair-brained messages. Their ideas appear to be tainting the judgments of even the most intelligent people in our country through their sheer repetition and the crusading severity with which they are espoused by their proponents.  

Richmond We Have a Problem

2

Justin Fairfax, running for Attorney General, appeared at Gerry Connolly's 19th annual St. Patrick's Day Fete on Sunday. In the most difficult venue Justin will face across Virginia, the straw poll results were close, but the speeches were night and day. Unfortunately, almost everyone had voted before the speeches took place. As for the speeches themselves, Justin Fairfax knocked it out of the park. Justin was dynamic, on message and had the crowd cheering. We can not afford to lose any of the statewide offices this year and we need to pick up seats in the House of Delegates. Justin can reach and inspire the voters we need to win big this year. The comparison of the candidate speeches speak for themselves. Here are both Attorney General speeches linked below.  

Mark Herring for AG Campaign Submits 16,895 Signatures

0

Nice going by Mark Herring's campaign!

Leesburg – Senator Mark Herring’s (Loudoun & Fairfax) campaign for Attorney General submitted his petitions to officially place his name on the Democratic primary ballot in June. In total, the Herring campaign submitted 16,895 signatures.

Herring thanked the volunteers and supporters across the state that helped him collect signatures.

“Thank you to the volunteers all across the Commonwealth who put in the hours and the hard work needed to get on the ballot,” Herring said. “This is truly a grassroots effort, and the amount of support we’ve received in this campaign is humbling. I look forward to continuing our momentum over the coming weeks and months as we work to bring fundamental change to the office of Attorney General.”

RNC Recommends Primaries, Criticizes Conventions; What Does Kookinelli Think?

1

I’ve been perusing the new report by the Republican National Committee (RNC) about why their party sucks so bad and loses national elections all the time about how to improve their party. Some of the most interesting recommendations, in my view, are stuck in at the tail end of the report, in a section called “Primary Process.” A few items jumped out at me (RNC recommendations in red; my commentary afterwards in black).

*“The number of debates has become ridiculous, and they’re taking candidates away from other important campaign activities…The number of debates should be reduced by roughly half to a still robust number of approximately 10 to 12, with the first occurring no earlier than September 1, 2015, and the last ending just after the first several primaries (February – March 2016).”

I find this recommendation hilariously misguided. The fact is, Democrats held a gazillion debates in 2007-2008, and it didn’t hurt them any. And they wouldn’t have hurt Republicans either, except for one thing: the Republican candidates were either crazy themselves, or pandering to “the crazies” in their party, thus turning off anyone sane. Sure, you can try to hide your crazy candidates – and rabid audiences – but in the end, I’m not sure that really gets at the core problem. Which is, again, that this party has become the 2013 version of the John Birch Society; a bunch of tinfoil-hat wearing extremists and bigots of various kinds.

*“The Republican Convention should be held earlier in the summer. It should be moved to late June or sometime in July, allowing our nominee more time to begin the general election phase…To facilitate moving up primary elections to accommodate an earlier convention, the Party should strongly consider a regional primary system or some other form of a major reorganization instead of the current system. The current system is a long, winding, often random road that makes little sense. It stretches the primaries out too long, forces our candidates to run out of money, and because some states vote so late, voters in those states never seem to count. Such a change would allow for a broader group of Republicans to play a role in selecting our nominee.”

This one’s also amusing, in part because it shows how much the Republican Party is focused on money and process over substance, but also because it’s already being blasted by the right wing (Rand Paul, Rick Santorum, etc.) as a “power grab.” According to one “close Paul adviser,” “Elimination of caucuses would mean nuclear war with the grassroots, social conservatives and [the] Ron Paul movement.” Awesome – more popcorn please! 🙂

*“We also recommend broadening the base of the Party and inviting as many voters as possible into the Republican Party by discouraging conventions and caucuses for the purpose of allocating delegates to the national convention. Our party needs to grow its membership, and primaries seem to be a more effective way to do so. The greater the number of people who vote in a Republican primary, the more likely they will turn out and vote again for the Republican candidate in the fall election.”

Finally, you’ve gotta love this one, strongly recommending primaries over conventions, because conventions involve such a tiny number of people compared to primaries, and Republicans need to “grow its membership.” Of course, here in Virginia, Ken Kookinelli and his Teahadist allies pushed in exactly the other direction, ditching the Republican primary for a much, much smaller, and much, much more right wingnut, convention. It “worked,” in the sense of pushing out Bill Bolling and coronating Cooch, but in terms of growing the party, basically the RNC is advising the exact opposite of what Cuccinelli et al. pulled off a few months ago. Fascinating, huh?

Video: President Obama Nominates Tom Perez for Secretary of Labor

0



Excellent nomination, also one sure to piss off anti-worker Republicans.

Liberals and labor leaders hailed Mr. Perez, calling him a champion for workers and those who have faced discrimination. “At a time when our politics tilts so heavily toward corporations and the very wealthy, our country needs leaders like Tom Perez to champion the cause of ordinary working people,” said Richard L. Trumka, president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.

James P. Hoffa, general president of the Teamsters, called Mr. Perez “the right choice” because of his history of advocacy. “In these difficult economic times,” Mr. Hoffa said, “workers need a fighter at the Labor Department who will stand up for them, and they are getting just that with Thomas Perez.”

While at the Justice Department, Mr. Perez has pursued a record number of discrimination or brutality claims against local police and sheriff’s departments, including that of Joe Arpaio, the outspoken sheriff in Maricopa County, Ariz., who was accused of “a pattern of unlawful discrimination” against Latinos.

P.S. The Democratic Party of Virginia says, “Congratulations to Tom Perez, Obama’s nominee to be the next Secretary of Labor. As the son of two immigrants, he understands the importance of preserving the American Dream and has spent his entire career fighting to keep the American dream within reach for hardworking middle class families and those striving to get into the middle class.”

Memo: Ken Cuccinelli vs Transportation Compromise

0
To: Interested Parties
From: McAuliffe Communications
Memo: Ken Cuccinelli vs Transportation Compromise

Today’s Washington Post Editorial laid bare Ken Cuccinelli’s career-long obstruction of any progress on transportation.  With Cuccinelli now threatening to use the Attorney General’s office to derail the bipartisan transportation bill because of his extreme ideological opposition to any transportation compromise, it is helpful to take a step back and look at the progression of his attempts to derail progress at every stage of the process.

November 2012:  

February 4, 2013: 

February 11, 2013: 

  • Washington Post: Virginia’s governor says he’s prepared to cut a deal on transportation 

February 22, 2013:  

February 23, 2013:  

  • Roanoke Times: Cuccinelli opinion could jeopordize deals on Medicaid, roads
  • Free Lance-Star: Cuccinelli opinion throws Assembly, transportation into doubt 
  • Washington Post: Cuccinelli opinion threatens Medicaid, transportation deals 

Later that day and February 24, 2013:  

But Ken Cuccinelli still doesn’t want to quit: 

March 15, 2013: 

  • NBC 4: Cuccinelli Says Transportation Plan Is Still Not Done