Home Blog Page 2489

Video: Tim Kaine Says “We all know we’ve got to fix the fiscal situation in the country”

0



Senator-elect Kaine continues to talk the exact same approach we’ve heard from him for a long time: seeking common ground with Republicans; helping restore civility to Washington, DC; working for “the good of the commonwealth and the country;” fixing the fiscal situation in the country in a balanced way (e.g., addressing “both sides of the balance sheet”); arguing that we can’t “cut our way to prosperity;” etc.

We’ll see if Kaine’s approach works once he starts trying to deal with the far-right-wing national Republican Party and the “my way or the highway” attitude of people like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Other than that, Kaine says he plans to “hit the ground on January 3 very much running” on the budget, immigration reform, and other areas where “we can make progress quickly if we listen to each other.” Finally, Kaine argues that the Senate is “not on a one-way path to dysfunction.” Good luck with that, I guess, but I’ll remain highly skeptical until I start seeing signs of Republicans acting responsibly, more of them ditching Grover Norquist and absolutist “pledges,” and the nasty kind of rhetoric we’ve seen just in recent weeks from John McCain and Lindsey Graham against Susan Rice. Again, we’ll see, but I certainly wish Tim Kaine luck in dealing with this mess!

The Race in the 7th District: Eric Cantor Can be Beaten

9

( – promoted by lowkell)

November 6 has come and gone, and Democrats, Liberals and Progressives the Commonwealth over have breathed several hearty sighs of relief. Despite a contentious and worrisome election season, Virginian’s can now look forward to a second term for President Obama and six years with Senator Kaine.

But a problem remains.

A problem that espouses extreme rhetoric yet doesn’t have the guts to identify as such. A problem that blocks, stalls, impedes and stonewalls. A problem that stands before the steady trudge of history screaming for it to stop. A problem that continues to weigh down the Old Dominion like a self-important albatross. A problem named Eric Cantor.

The shortcomings of the current House GOP leader are far too extensive to list here. But even as a casual reader of the news and this blog can attest, Eric Cantor makes headlines more for his anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-compromise cry-baby antics than for any significant legislative accomplishment. Lucky for us, while Mr. Cantor is a significant impediment to progress, he’s also exceedingly beatable.

Case in point: This last election cycle, Eric Cantor was challenged by Democrat Wayne Powell, a community lawyer from Chesterfield and a first-time candidate. Mr. Powell ran a spirited, passionate campaign that took Cantor to task and held his feet to the fire. As the deputy director of communications in the final months of the campaign, I saw first hand the groundswell of anti-Cantor sentiment that seethed just below the surface of the 7th district. And although we lost, I am proud of the candidate I supported, the work we did and the ground we covered. This race also proved that Eric Cantor is far from the the unconquerable behemoth that has the DCCC shaking in its boots.

Firstly, there’s the much-discussed Hickman Analytics poll released in June that revealed Eric Cantor’s popularity had taken a substantial hit due to, among other things, his antiquated stance on women’s health issues and his refusal to work with the president. The poll also showed that 43 percent of 7th District residence would vote to replace Cantor, as opposed to only 41 percent who maintained their support.

What’s more, this race marked the first time in ten years that Eric Cantor had agreed to debate an opponent. Coupled with a surprising onslaught of expensive ad buys and direct mail attacks, and its clear Mr. Cantor is terrified that his grip on the district is slipping.

And then there are the actual election results.  

The news organizations called the race rather early for Cantor. After all, it would seem a foregone conclusion that a well-funded and well-connected candidate like the GOP Leader would carry the day in such a conservative district. Indeed, Powell garnered 42 percent of the vote to Cantor’s 58 percent. Yet this seemingly straightforward electoral sweep belies a rather heartening truth for Virginia Democrats. Say what you will about the nature of 7th district politics, but the numbers don’t lie. And the numbers point to a slow but steady trend in favor of Democratic candidates.

To wit: In 2002, Eric Cantor’s first challenger garnered a mere 30 percent of the vote. By 2008, challenger Anita Hartke had bridged that gap and came away with 37 percent. And this year, Wayne Powell earned the support of 42 percent of the electorate, the highest of any challenger to date. All told, this reveals an embarrassing loss of 12 percentage points for Cantor over ten years. Not exactly a recipe for long-term electoral success.

So what is the ultimate take away? What can we learn from yet another stinging defeat at the hands of Virginia’s biggest problem?

That he is beatable. Not easily, and not quickly. Make no mistake: Cantor is a formidable foe, with a campaign war chest that would make even the most seasoned Big Oil CEO dab at his brow with his silk pocket square. And while the electoral trend within the district is indeed a positive one, it has been subject to its own disappointing fits and starts.

Our path isn’t an easy one, but it is a clear one. By coupling a tough, progressive candidate with an electorate growing in anti-Cantor sentiment, it is conceivable to foresee a 7th District gone blue. But it’s not enough to know what to do. We have to exercise our power a citizens to get it done. Pressuring local and state-wide Democrats to embrace, nominate and fund an unabashed Democratic candidate for the seat is only the first step in a long and winding road fraught with political peril.

The phrase “fortune favors the bold” is attributed to ancient Roman playwright Terence. Despite the intervening years, 7th District Democrats would do well to adopt it as their own.  

Video: Another Republican Senator Tells Grover Norquist to Take a Hike

5



Per ThinkProgress:

When you’re $16 trillion in debt, the only pledge we should be making to each other is to avoid becoming Greece, and Republicans should put revenue on the table. We’re this far in debt. We don’t generate enough revenue. Capping deductions will help generate revenues. Raising tax rates will hurt job creation. I agree with Grover that we shouldn’t raise rates, but I think Grover is wrong when it comes to we can’t cap deductions. […] I will violate the pledge, long story short for the good of the country, only if Democrats will do entitlement reforms.

What’s Grover going to do when he’s completely irrelevant, as he’s rapidly becoming? Here’s a thought: go find another country to try and screw up, and leave the United States of America alone!

What’s that sound? It’s Grover Norquist’s empire collapsing.

0

In 1985, Grover Norquist founded American for Tax Reform with the goal of advocating for flatter tax rates in the United States. Since then, he's taken his crusade to ever-increasing levels of absurdity in dogmatically opposing every revenue measure to curb the federal deficit. Norquist's “Taxpayer Protection Pledge” has been influential in re-writing the Republican Party's ideology to avoid compromise and decry revenue-for-spending-cuts deals. As recently as the day before the November 2012 elections, Mr. Norquist's “Pledge” had been signed by 238 House Republicans and 41 Senate Republicans, giving his uncompromising rhetoric an outright majority in the House and the ability to filibuster in the Senate. However, it appears as though Mr. Norquist's empire is quickly collapsing in recent days as the Republican Party seems to have had a fairly significant shift in tax policy.

The incombing Congress will see less that 218 House Republicans having signed the pledge (placing Mr. Norquist finally in the minority) and the number of Senate Republicans signed onto the peldge dropped to 39. Further, GOP Senators Chambliss and Graham (the former having been a staunch Conservative in the ranks while the latter has been known to occasionally break rank with the party leadership) have come out forecfully against Norquist's “read my lips” position in the face of a fiscal cliff and economic calamity (their statements are after the “flip”.) Clearly, more than two Republican Senators will need to speak up against the Party's trot towards the extreme, yet that two prominent Republicans would publicly condemn someone who has up until now been considered the standard-bearer of Republican economic ideology is in and of itself sign of a changing wind.

Rep. Peter King (R-NY), a safely-entrenched Republican from Long Island, came out Today calling Norquist's “No new taxes” pledge about as relevant to today's fiscal situation as re-attacking Japan for World War II would be. 

The list of other GOP Statesmen to have disavowed Norquist is growing. Fmr. President George H. W. Bush, fmr. Florida Governor Jeb Bush, fmr. Utah Governor and China Ambassador Jon Huntsman, Iowa Representative Steve King and numerous others have all bucked the pledge.  

Clearly, one should be fairly cautious in assuming that this implies that a Grand Bargain that equally balances spending cuts with needed tax hikes on wealthier Americans will be priority #1 for John Boehner and House Republicans, but it nonetheless is oh so sweet to see Grover Norquist's prized crusade being abandoned by his own Party. 

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on ABC's “This Week”

I would violate the Pledge for the good of the Country – if Democrats will do entitlement reform. I think Grover is wrong when it comes to capping deductions and buying down the debt… What I would say to Grover Norquist is that Sequester would destroy the United States military. It must be replaced.

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) on WMAZ

I care more about my country that I do a 20-year old pledge. If we do it [Norquist]'s way, we'll continue on in debt, and I just have a disagreement about that… I don't worry about [a Primary challenge] because I care too much about my Country. I care a lot more about it than I do Grover Norquist.

Virginia News Headlines: Sunday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, November 25.

*GOP faces unexpected challenges in South amid shrinking white vote

*Lincoln, Liberty and Two Americas (“We are moving toward two Americas with two contrasting – and increasingly codified – concepts of liberty. Can such a nation long endure?”)

*ACC Football: Hokies squeak past Cavaliers, retain Commonwealth Cup

*House District #4 (Another in NLS’ continuing series on Virginia House of Delegates districts…)

*Virginia Republicans to let ‘personhood’ bill die this week

*McDonnell’s ‘chief of stuff’ stepping down but staying in family

*A post-election Q and A with Tim Kaine (“I’m kind of using (former Sen.) John Warner as my model as somebody who dug in, did it for a long time, accomplished a lot of good, and the fact that he was there for a while enabled him to attain positions that helped him do good things for the country and the commonwealth.”)

*Hopefuls line up for 2013 election

*McDonnell to headline two dinners for Bolling

*Editorial: Abolish the 21-day rule (“Gov. Bob McDonnell’s pardon freed an innocent man, but it will take months to clear his name.”)

*Political ads brought region’s TV stations $27 million (“The biggest winner in the Roanoke-Lynchburg market was WDBJ (Channel 7), which got $10.4 million.”)

*Grand space needs grand conversation

*Va. official pitches mandatory anti-smoking classes

*Educators in Hampton Roads fear layoffs, other “fiscal cliff” fallout

*Editorial: Precinct plan is a matter of arithmetic (“A plan to consolidate Roanoke’s voting precincts is facing unwarranted allegations of racism. The plan is about making it easier to vote.”)

*D.C. area forecast: Still on the cool side. Might we see some snowflakes fly midweek?

US Troops’ “Call Me Maybe” Parody Video Dedicated to Cuccinelli, Delgaudio, “Sideshow Bob,” etc.

0



Hahahahaha, the worst nightmares (or are they fantasies?) of rabid homophobes like Loudoun County Supervisor Embarrassment Eugene Delgaudio, State Sen. Dick Black, Del. Bob Marshall, Virginia AG Ken Kookinelli, and many others (e.g., “Bobby” McDonnell’s BFF Pat Robertson) come to life. Is this what Delgaudio et al. imagined our macho troops (in this case, in Afghanistan) would turn into if Congress repealed “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell?” Miami Dolphins cheerleader  impersonators?  Hahahahahahaha.

RIP Larry Hagman: TV Star, Clean Energy Fan, George W. Bush…Well, NOT a Fan!

0



Larry Hagman, who became famous playing Capt. Tony Nelson on the TV comedy show “I Dream of Jeannie” (see video of the opening theme song and credits on the “flip”), then even more famous playing oil baron and villain J.R. Ewing, died yesterday of cancer at the age of 81, in Dallas of course. In addition to his acting career, Ewing also was a huge fan of clean energy, as the video above, and the ones on the “flip,” illustrate. Finally, Hagman’s politics were decidedly left-leaning, and to put it mildly he was no fan of George W. Bush. For instance, Hagman said of his fellow Texan that Bush was a “sad figure: not too well educated, who doesn’t get out of America much. He’s leading the country towards fascism.” Hagman took another dig at Bush, commenting that he “wouldn’t understand the word facism anyway.” LOL

Rest in peace, Mr. Hagman, and thanks for all the memories. I’m off to watch some “I Dream of Jeannie” (see part 1 of the pilot episode on the “flip”).

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, November 24.

*Opponents of Egypt’s Mursi call Cairo protest for Tuesday

*Chambliss latest US Republican to break with anti-tax lobbyist (Good to see, although I still despise Chambliss for his despicable smearing of triple-amputee, Vietnam War hero Max Cleland as some sort of bin Laden sympathizer.)

*Can Democrats Retake the House in 2014? (“…we actually won the overall votes in House races by the same 2% plus margin that Obama did, so re-districting dominated by Republican gerrymandering clearly played a big role in them holding on to the House. Democrats, though, are making a big mistake in attributing our failure solely to gerrymandering and essentially giving up on retaking the House the rest of this decade as many pundits are suggesting.”)

*How Democrats can keep winning (“The party has to rely on ideas, not demographics.”)

*Promises on Gun Control (“President Obama now has the freedom to take on the issue that politicians shun.”)

*House District #28 (“The 28th district would be a very competitive open seat at this point.  Can it be competitive with the Speaker still in it- and his unlimited warchest?  It would take the perfect candidate to unseat him, but the numbers alone say it could be done just with Obama/Kaine voters if Democrats could get them out and hold them in a general election.”)

*Virginia lawmaker wants to stiffen new voter-ID law (Why? What on earth possible reason for this would there be? No way in hell!)

*Legislative battle heating up over Va. uranium mining

*Mr. McDonnell’s chance for a transportation legacy (“…does the governor have the spine to twist the arms of his fellow Republicans?”)

*Thousands of remains from Civil War battle surface in Virginia basement

*Doubts plague plans for new 460

*Va. Tech and Virginia today at noon

*D.C. area forecast: Winterlike conditions return; midweek storm?

UPDATE: Also see It’s time to accept Obamacare, Virginia by my Delegate, Patrick Hope.

Krugman on the Teapublican Mindset: “If evidence seems to contradict faith, suppress the evidence”

3



Sadly, as Paul Krugman correctly points out, it’s not just on climate science that the Teapublican’ts follow the mantra, “If evidence seems to contradict faith, suppress the evidence.” It’s on everything: Marco Rubio’s inability to admit that science has, indeed, figured out how old our planet is (and no, the answer is NOT 6,000 years!); “unskewing” the polls because they didn’t believe it was possible President Obama could win reelection; adhering to “the dogma that cutting taxes on the wealthy leads to higher economic growth,” etc, etc.

As always, I can’t even imagine how 47%, or even 4.7% for that matter, of Americans could vote for a party that is so deeply hostile to rationality, to empirical reasoning, to science, to reality itself. I’m sure in part this is a failure of our education system, but what else is going on here? Are these people dumbed down from watching the idiot box (particularly channels like Faux “News”) hours a day from an early age? I mean, that could certainly rot people’s brains out of their heads. Are certain personality types simply immune to things like facts, logic, and math? All of the above? Any other theories?