Home Blog Page 2488

Mark Warner: Lifting Payroll Cap “has to be part of any SS reform”

13

Does Sen. Mark Warner read Ezra Klein, who recently noted that “Social Security taxes don’t apply to income over $110,000?” Maybe, maybe not. But Warner does seem to be coming around to Klein’s position on the issue, based on an answer Warner just provided to my question on his #askwarner Twitter townhall.

My question: “Before even considering cuts to Soc. Security or Medicare, will you support raising the $110,000 income cap subject to taxation?

Warner’s answer: “@lowkell I think raising the cap has to be part of any SS reform.”

I checked around, including OnTheIssues, and it appears that Tim Kaine supports lifting the payroll tax cap, but that Mark Warner had, at least until now, had “No stance on record” on this issue. In contrast, Warner has said he supports raising the retirement age for Social Security, which is what Ezra Klein talks about in his column, noting the Congressional Budget Office finding that making “all income subject to payroll taxes…would do three times as much to solve Social Security’s shortfall as raising the retirement age to 70.” Let’s hope Sen. Warner reaches the same conclusion as Ezra Klein, and the CBO, have.

Are We Better Off WITH “Sideshow Bob?”

6

Recently, Not Larry Sabato analyzed the Virginia House of Delegates district of Del. Bob Marshall (R-Prince William/Manassas Park), and concluded that it most resembles New Mexico politically – a solid Obama/Kaine/Democratic district in presidential years. The implication, of course, is that “Sideshow Bob,” as I call him (because of his many insane, extreme antics and general tomfoolery) should be one of the top targets for Virginia Democrats in 2013. Of course, that assumes we get our “presidential year” voters out in odd-year Virginia elections, and that’s easier said than done. But still, wouldn’t it be great to boot Bob for good? Seems like a no-brainer, right?

Then I saw this article and it got me thinking, are we actually better off WITH “Sideshow Bob” Marshall in some ways than without him? First, read this from the HuffPo piece:

Virginia Del. Bob Marshall (R-Prince William), the author of the state’s fetal personhood bill, says he has always been a bit of a thorn in the side of the mainstream Republican Party. But since the 2012 election, he said, the party is “more overtly gun-shy” about dealing with abortion, and the pressure from GOP leadership to back off of his socially conservative agenda is constant.

It doesn’t happen more than seven days a week, 52 weeks a year,” he told The Huffington Post sarcastically in an interview. “Through committee assignments, being shoved aside … I’ve had to deal with things the hard way.”

He added, “The Republican consultants have advised ducking these social issues for years. The social conservatives don’t get any credit when they help Republicans win, but they get blamed by the consultant class when they lose.

First of all, I’ve just got to say, hahahahahahaha. Poor Sideshow.

Second, more seriously, what this tells me is that “Sideshow Bob” is a major problem for Virginia Republicans, one they must expend a lot of energy on to try – and often fail – to keep under control. And why are Virginia Republicans even trying to keep “Sideshow Bob” under control at all? It’s not as if they disagree with him on making abortion illegal in most or all circumstances. Since it’s not substantive, it must be politics: e.g., Virginia Republicans know that the issues “Sideshow Bob” insists on pushing, year after year, are simply killing them with Virginia women. Perhaps even worse, if that’s possible, the “Sideshow Bobs” of the world – add to the long list people like Rick Santorum, Ken Kookinelli, Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Dick Black, Eugene Delgaudio, etc. – are generally killing the Republican “brand,” making them seem (correctly, as far as I can determine) that they want to be in everyone’s bedroom and doctor’s office, telling you what you can, and more to the point can NOT, do with your body and your private life. And that doesn’t just hurt them with women, but also with a lot of men as well.

So, why shouldn’t Virginia Democrats just sit back, heat up some popcorn, and enjoy the “Sideshow Bob” (and Dick Black, Eugene Delgaudio, etc.) Show for many years to come? Only one reason, albeit an important one: these guys do damage, not just to the Republican Party, but to a lot of Virginians (e.g., the heinous “Marshall-Newman” amendment enshrines anti-LGBT discrimination in our constitution). For that reason alone, we should almost certainly toss political considerations aside and do everything we can to boot Bob in 2013. Still, the political part of me keeps salivating at the thought of keeping this clown around for many, many election years to come.

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

0

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, November 27. By the way, any Democrat who goes on Faux “News” should call them out like Tom Ricks did. Either that, or don’t go on Faux “News” at all.

*New Scientist Special Report: 7 Reasons Climate Change Is ‘Even Worse Than We Thought’ (Put a hefty tax on carbon now!)

*Former Florida GOP leaders say voter suppression was reason they pushed new election law (Any further questions on why Republicans rant and rave about mythical, nonexistent “voter fraud?”)

*Santorum: ‘I’m Open’ to 2016 Run (Excellent – run Rick run!!!)

*Norquist faces test as GOP flirts with deserting pledge

*Breaking Norquist’s oath (“Are Republicans starting to recover their senses?”)

*Yes, elections do ‘have consequences’

*Va gets federal emergency declaration from storm

*Panel may toughen texting law

*Virginia’s road-building process is flawed, new study contends

*Gas tax change? (“Governor McDonnell suggests changing the gas tax.”)

*Does Cuccinelli think soft voting laws helped Obama?

*Snyder declares for LG race (The only things you really need to know about this guy are 1) that he’s a protege of Republican Big Liar in Chief Frank Luntz; and 2) that he’s a right wingnut. Blech.)

*Ex-Dem Rep. Davis to address Virginia GOP at Beach event (And the only thing you need to know about Artur Davis is that he’s one of the slimiest, most opportunistic, principle-less politicians out there. And that’s saying something!)

*Northern Va. county supervisor makes a push for smoker-free living

*John Frey withdraws from Va. AG race (“The Fairfax circuit court clerk entered race last year.”)

*Uranium Working Group meets today in Richmond

*Uranium Money Spreads Across Virginia in Radioactive Debate

*Report: Virginia workers see wages drop

*Va. Port Authority to hear privatization proposals today

*House District #7 (This one’s most similar to Nebraska.)

*A programming note from city and politics reporter Mason Adams

*Crime Drops, But Virginians Pack More Heat

*Redskins deal passes after last-minute negotiations

*Fairfax takes big step in removing road through Tysons’ last green space

The People Have Spoken, But the Peter Peterson Crowd Keeps Calling for Austerity for the 99%

1

Three weeks ago tonight, we rejoiced that we had elected President Barak Obama to a second term and retained the US Senate. We ousted numerous Neanderthal wingers. And the people had spoken a resounding “No!” to those who would continue the massive tax giveaways to the millionaires and billionaires. We went to bed around 2:30 AM.  Not four hours later the minions of Peter Peterson were at it again, as if no election had ever taken place. They were on every news outlet chanting the contrivance of the “fiscal cliff,” which doesn’t exist except for their own making. They want “austerity” for all of us (but not them). On one radio and TV show after another, they took aim at the very heart of the people’s budget. And so on it went.

The cast of characters was long. I’ll name a few names. As this Huffington Post article tells it, the CEO Council demands cuts to the poor, elderly, and the hungry while reaping billions in government tax breaks, contracts and even/especially bailouts.  They’re engaged in a zero-sum game.

The worst offender, though, is the architect of the faux debt crisis. Peter Peterson, conservative GOP partisan and founder of the Blackstone Group, Center for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) and Americans for Prosperity (AFP), blanketed the networks with disinformation and propaganda. Many ads messaged  directly or indirectly against president Obama and Democrats. Through CRFB and AFP he’s poured 30 million into the campaign to rip off you and me to benefit rich people like himself.

Grover Norquist is still fulminating about a pledge some members of Congress signed as much as twenty years ago. Some life’s work this man has been engaged in (snark). As Andrew Rosenthal opined in today’s New York Times,


But Mr. Norquist’s entire tax crusade fails to pass the laugh test as serious – or even unserious – economic policy. It has mired the United States in economic turmoil. And yet it endures, because Republicans are afraid they will be made to pay for their transgressions in the next election.

As Huffington Post indicates, a couple of the despicable (my word, not theirs) CEOs, Loyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs and David Cote of Honeywell  rail about anything which helps the poor or middle classes, yet these two dudes eat daily at the federal trough. The contemptible Blankfein was bailed out by you and me. And he has the gall to demand we give up our futures. Honeywell’s CEO refuses to hire unless he has his way. But according to the Huntington article, between 2008 and 2010, Honeywell paid no taxes at all. It has no right to even talk to us about sacrifice. Does Pig-at-the-Trough Cote even hear himself?

On the Peterson austerity tour, Former Governor Ed Rendell bleats the austerity song while taking a fat paycheck from investment bank Greenhill and Co. Former New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg is on the payroll of Goldman Sachs. We bailed out his ass. And he wants us on austerity. How despicable can a person be? Ditto JP Morgan Chase. We bailed it out and now its CEO wants austerity for us, but not millionaires.  All of them continue as if an election never took place.  

The Gang of Eight pretends an election never took place. Leading it is one Democrat, Mark Warner who is himself one of the richest men in in Congress. (“Let them eat cake!”)

And here is the unbelievable kicker. It’s a list of inconvenient facts, which the scourge that is the Peterson crowd doesn’t want you to know. I  paraphrase them from the Alternet article and present them in a different order. I also add some commentary.

1. Tax deductions, loopholes, exclusions, and credits for the rich could pay of 100% of the deficit, according to the Tax Policy Center. Be that as it may, I would also raise the tax rate back to 39% for the upper brackets.

2. The American public paid about 4 trillion to bail out the banks. Now Peterson and the CEOs want us to pay twice.

3. An amount roughly equal to one half of the GDP is held untaxed overseas by the rich. According to the Tax Justice Network, between $21 and $32 trillion dollars is hidden offshore.  Make them pay up.

4. Corporations stopped paying half of their taxes after the recession.  (How do we let them get away with that?)

5. Only 3% of the very rich are entrepreneurs. So, the super rich are not job creators.

6. Just 10 Americans made a total of 50 Billion dollars in one year.

7. Only four out of 150 countries have greater wealth inequality than we do.

8. Elderly and disabled food stamp recipients get only $4.30 for food a day.  As recent demonstrations by celebrities have shown, it’s impossible to eat even close to a healthy diet on that.

9. The average African American or Hispanic woman has about $100 in net worth.

10. Young adults have lost 2/3 of their net worth since 1984 (and unless we do something to protect their futures, they will have no pensions or Social Security when they are too old to work).

Here is another fact: Despite the lies being told by those trying to put Social Security on the table, cutting the future retirement insurance for those under 55 will hurt them AND current retirees by siphoning money out of the program. (That’s because the program was designed to be pay-as-you-go.) Everyone in the 99% gets hurt.

And here is one more fact, the poor didn’t cause the recession. Nor did the elderly, working men and women, the unemployed, children, the retired or the sick. But many of the very people who are yammering about austerity for the 99% (but not for them) are the ones who did cause the recession.  Let them not eat cake, but rather the deficit, as in pay for it. They did this. The CEO council, the Gang of Eight, all the other Peterson appendages, and the top 1%  should pay up and leave the rest of us alone. Americans were hammered by the recession. We already paid for the misdeeds of all the tax scofflaws, the fraud of the banksters, the actions of the manipulators, and and pigs at the trough. We did our share. We bailed them out.  

The people have spoken. No more coddling the rich.  None. They either are one of us and pay their fair share or they are not. Let President Obama and our members of Congress know the American people expect our leaders to stand with us and against punishing us any more (than we have been already) for the excesses of the 1%, their causing the recession, their tax evasion, their wage suppression, their raiding of Americans’ pension funds, and their greed.

 

Audio: Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli Questions Legitimacy of President Obama’s Reelection

2



Per the Virginia Pilot’s Julian Walker, it appears that Virginia Attorney General – and 2013 gubernatorial candidate – Ken Cuccinelli has added to his long list of crazy comments, stances, etc. This time, he’s questioning the legitimacy of President Obama’s reelection, strongly agreeing with a right-wing radio host that Obama “can’t win in a state where photo ID is required,…So clearly there’s something going on out there.” He’s also buying into the Big Lie about supposedly widespread “voter fraud.” In fact, there’s almost ZERO voter fraud in this country, but Republicans have used this made-up/phony “issue” to put into place – or try to, anyway – draconian laws making it harder for American to exercise their right to vote. Disgusting.

Of course, this is the same guy who dabbles in “birtherism”, who denies climate change, who tries to make it easier for people to discriminate against gay people, who claims that Virginia can disobey federal laws it disagrees with, who believes the government is tracking his kids via Social Security numbers, who talks to a toy elephant named “Ron”, etc, etc. What else would you expect from this cuckoo bird?

Video: Protege of GOP Big Liar Frank Luntz Announces for Virginia LG

1

Yet another Republican’t announces for Virginia Lieutenant Governor.

Republican businessman and GOP spokesman Pete Snyder formally entered the race for Virginia Lt. Governor Monday with an exclusive announcement on NBC12 First at 4.

Snyder, a close ally of Governor Bob McDonnell and wealthy entrepreneur had long been expected to enter an already crowded field. He made it official during a live TV interview.

So who is Pete Snyder?  First of all, the guy’s a delusional shill for whatever garbage he’s told to spew out by his Republican masters (he did a lot of it, including lying through his teeth about President Obama’s “you didn’t build that” comments, as Virginia Victory 2012 chair this past election cycle). Second, as I wrote in August 2010, the guy’s a piece of work in general, including being a protege of Frank “Big Lie” Luntz (among other things, Luntz “renamed the estate tax the “death tax” and told Republicans to lie and call healthcare reform a ‘government takeover’ of the medical system.”). It’s not a pretty picture: check out the “flip” for the sordid details.

Next, we get New Republican Media Strategies CEO Pete Snyder. For those of you who aren’t aware, Snyder is a big-time Republican (was senior political director for Frank Luntz, polled for Rudy Giuliani, “regularly appears as a conservative commentator and marketing expert on the Fox News Channel”), donor to Virginia Republicans, and “free market” (aka, corporate welfare, trading off political connections) proponent who I hear plans to run for Virginia Lieutenant Governor (or possibly state legislature) in 2013. Given all that, Snyder’s speech doesn’t disappoint, giving McDonnell credit for singlehandedly producing the (mythical) $400 million not-a-surplus. Following that howler, Snyder proceeds to give shoutouts to his “special people” – Secretary of Commerce, Delegate Dave Albo (R- Booze, Abuser Fees), Del. Barbara Comstock (R-Blinded by the Right), Del. Jim Lemunyon (R-Oakton), and believe it or not Fred “Jew Counter” Malek (also, what on earth are Del. Patrick Hope and Del. Mark Keam doing at this travesty?).

Snyder then proceeds to gloss over the fact that the federal government was largely responsible for creating and nurturing the internet and communications infrastructure that makes Snyder’s business possible. He even makes a lame, but apparently de rigeur, joke about the internet being created in “Al Gore’s basement.” Hahahahaha. Ha. Oh, and the whole reason why Snyder’s business has expanded is because of (his) “hard work”, as opposed to: a) the federal government creating and maintaining much of the technology and infrastructure he uses; b) clients like the warm-and-fuzzy “Clean Coal” crowd (note: I hear they moved their staff way to the right when they got that contract), not to mention the Jack Abramoff/Northern Marianas Islands slave labor/Roy Blunt/Tom DeLay connection). Ee gads. “Hard work” indeed. More like trading off of their ties to powerful, unscrupulous, Republican lawmakers.

Of course, being a right-wingnut and a slimeball is no obstacle to seeking, or even obtaining, the Republican Party’s nomination for public office these days. I guess what remains to be seen is whether Pete Snyder will be able to compete with the likes of Corey Stewart, Jeannemarie Devolites Davis, Scott Lingamfelter, E.W. Jackson, State Sen. Stephen Martin, Stafford County Board Chair Susan Stimpson, or god knows what other right wingnuts throw their (tinfoil?) hats in the ring. Ee gads.

“Fiscal Cliff” Notes

0

fiscalcliffnotes2.jpgElections have consequences. In the voting booth, Virginians and Americans spoke loud and clear in favor of raising revenue and creating jobs. As Congress approaches the so-called “fiscal cliff”, it’s time to bring some sanity in to the discussion. Below is a terrific 5-point guide from MoveOn to the fiscal showdown cuts through the political noise. But before we get there, here are a few facts to keep in mind:

Congress has an opportunity to do the right thing before the end of the year, and enact the policies voters supported on Election Day!

By ending the Bush Tax Cuts for the top 2%, and letting middle class taxes remain steady, we strengthen the middle class and maintain their purchasing power while helping businesses stay strong as the economy continues to recover. At the same time, the revenue generated by asking the wealthiest among us to pay just a little bit more will help restore fiscal sanity and create greater confidence in the U.S. economy.

It’s an important fight we need to win in Congress. Ending the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% will restore sanity to our economy and make sure everyone is paying their fair share.

Join us today: take action to end the Bush Tax Cuts for the top 2%!

5-Point Guide To The Fiscal Showdown

1. The “Fiscal Cliff” Is A Myth. As Paul Krugman put it, “The looming prospect of spending cuts and tax increases isn’t a fiscal crisis. It is, instead, a political crisis brought on by the G.O.P.’s attempt to take the economy hostage.” Republicans are manufacturing this crisis to pressure Democrats to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and accept painful cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

2. The Bush Tax Cuts Finally End December 31. If Congress does nothing, the ax will fall on all the Bush tax cuts on New Year’s Eve. Then, on January 1, the public pressure on John Boehner and House Republicans to extend the middle-class tax cuts (already passed by the Senate and waiting to be signed by President Obama) will become irresistible. So the middle-class tax cut will eventually get renewed, and we’ll have $823 billion more revenue from the top 2% to do great things with.

3. The Sequester. The sequester is another political creation, forced on Democrats by Republicans in exchange for lifting the debt ceiling last year to avoid crashing our economy. It’s a set of cuts (50% to a bloated military budget and 50% to important domestic programs) designed to make both Republicans and Democrats hate it so much that they’d never let it happen. And the cuts can be reversed weeks or months into 2013 without causing damage.

4. The Big Three. Nothing happens to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits on January 1–unless Republicans force painful cuts to beneficiaries in exchange for tax increases on the wealthy, which are going to happen anyway if Congress does NOTHING. So, there’s literally no reason benefits cuts should be part of the discussion right now.

5. We Should Be Talking About Jobs. The real crisis Americans want Congress to fix is getting people back to work. And with just a fraction of that $823 billion from the wealthiest 2%, we could create jobs for more than 20,000 veterans and pay for the 300,000 teachers and 52,000 first responders, which our communities so desperately need. That’s not to mention jobs from investing in clean energy and our national infrastructure.

Background:

New York Times Topic: Bush-Era Tax Cuts

Washington Post: The sequester, explained 

Paul Krugman: Hawks and Hypocrites 

Slate: Boehner is Bluffing

5-Point Guide originally posted by MoveOn.org

Video: Tom Ricks Rips Fox for Hyping Benghazi, Being an Arm of the Republican Party

0

FYI, Thomas Ricks is an expert on the military, a Pulitzer Prize winning former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, and author of superb books like “Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq” and “The Generals: American Military Command from World War II to Today.”

Ricks’ criticism here of Faux “News” is totally on point, and I find it hilarious to see the Faux interviewer acting shocked (shocked I say!) that anyone would accuse his network of hyping a story for political purposes. Of course, that’s exactly what this wildly irresponsible network has been doing for years now, most recently on the Benghazi tragedy. Also, note that Fox never turned its finely honed journalistic instincts (yes, that was extreme snark) on the disasters of the Bush administration, which led to and/or presided over the deaths of many, many, many more Americans – and many more attacks on U.S. facilities – than have ever occurred in the Obama administration, let alone in that one tragic incident in Libya.

Not that Faux will ever apologize for its disgraceful behavior, of course, or feel any shame (which it should), or change its wildly irresponsible and crazily biased ways. As long as a few million mostly angry, older white men watch the network, I guess they’ve got a business model. It’s just not a model of moral behavior, let alone of national cohesion or a thriving democracy…

P.S. ThinkProgress points out that Faux cut the interview short because, basically, they didn’t like being called out for exactly what they are. LOL

Redskins Deal Sleight of Hand Dazzles Dwight

0

That property on Patterson where Shirley McClain’s and Warren Beatty’s father was a school administrator is being used in a clumsy bait and switch. You have to wonder if Shirley will one day return there to haunt the place. You don’t have to wonder if this deal will haunt Richmond.

The seven basic principles of (fiscal) magic:

  • Palm – Hold the public trust in an apparently empty hand.
  • Ditch – Secretly trade the public trust.
  • Steal – Secretly obtain a fungible obligation.
  • Load – Secretly move the obligation into a form that is popular.
  • Switch – Secretly exchange one obligation for another.
  • Simulation – Give the impression that something has happened that has not.
  • Misdirection – Lead attention away from a secret move.

With Mayor Jones “acting” to represent the public interest, private interests unveiled a Redskins summer camp proposal that featured a “public-private partnership.” The mayor apparently unwittingly allowed his “advisors” to pretend they went with nothing in hand to the private sector seeking sponsors. There is actually no telling how many different objects were palmed during the pitch. Palm: But we now understand one of the hidden objects was a property on Patterson Avenue. Ditch, steal, and load: Quietly, Bon Secours sidled up, greased the palm and that property slid into theirs.  

“How much of that would have happened regardless of the Redskins? Bon Secours has long expressed interest in the Westhampton site, and a 3-week training camp isn’t going to drive major expansions it wasn’t already planning.” – Style Weekly

Switch: Money that rightly would obtain a leasehold on that property has been recharacterized as a sponsorship for the Redskins summer camp facility. Simulation: Bon Secours plays the magnanimous benefactor of the city, getting a desired property at a discount while the city pretends the Redskins camp has been secured at little or no cost to the public despite shifting debt authority from schools and other public functions to bridge the $7.5 to $9 million gap between Bon Secours’ payments and construction of the facility. Misdirection: No less than Governor McDonnell, the man who shifted half the cost of the original Redskins incentive deal to local jurisdictions has returned to the scene of the crime. Because a fawning press and ineffective opposition have allowed him to maintain credibility with the people of Virginia despite his consistent obfuscations, McDonnell acts to sidetrack substantive discussion. He has never explained why the state should subsidize the summer camp facility by contributing state land on which it will be built in addition to the $6 million ransom already paid directly to the Redskins, including $2 million he obligated Loudon County to kick in. That is all before Richmond’s obligations.

What seems to be lost in the discussion is most of the math. A dazzling array of numbers has been thrown around like chaff. But, Style Weekly’s Steve Bass (as in not mainstream media) has done a more than respectable analysis of the deal as we know it. Remember that in addition to the $10 million construction obligation, there’s the $500,000 a year stipend the city will pay the Redskins. And that says nothing about the annual public safety expenses that will further tax city finances.

“For those who said it could not be done, sit back and take notice,” Jones boasted.

What exactly Mayor Jones thinks has happened and what has come to pass are two ships passing in the night. He should have come out swinging at McDonnell’s original deal. Instead, he seems to have been cowed into going along to get along. This is a haunting lesson about the influence of private interests on public policy. It is also a dramatic lesson about how shiny objects can distract the naive. What Mayor Jones appears to lack, apart from business savvy, is the introspection to learn the real lesson out of this: There is a big difference between what could be done and what should be done. But he is not alone in this boat. He need look no further than Virginia Beach for a fellow traveler.

What remains to be seen is whether the rest of Richmond’s City Council will acquiese to participation as unindicted co-conspirators in a deal that will most certainly haunt Richmond for years to come.

A Quibble with Ezra Klein on (Not) Raising the Retirement Age

0

Before I get to my quibble with Ezra Klein, I first strongly recommend that everyone read his column, “Why rich guys want to raise the retirement age”. The bottom line is that it’s galling to listen to rich people like Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein talk about raising the retirement age, when in no way will folks like Blankfein ever feel the pain from doing so:

They don’t want to retire at age 65, and they don’t have short life expectancies, and they’re not mainly relying on Social Security for their retirement income. They’re bravely advocating a cut they’ll never feel.

Meanwhile, as Klein correctly points out, you don’t hear the Blankfeins of the world talking about lifting the cap on Social Security taxes (currently at the first $110,000 of income, even if you make $16.1 million per year, as Blankfein does). Doing that, as Klein explains, “would do three times as much to solve Social Security’s shortfall as raising the retirement age to 70.” In fact, Klein adds, “it would, in one fell swoop, close Social Security’s solvency gap for the next 75 years.”

In other words, next time you hear a politician, of either party, talk about raising the retirement age without talking about raising the cap on Social Security taxes from $110,000, feel free to tell them to take a long stroll off a very short pier into an extremely deep lake.

So what’s my quibble with Ezra Klein on this subject? Basically, it’s the part I’ve bolded in the following sentence by Klein: “One of the things the richest society the world has ever known can buy is a decent retirement for people who don’t have jobs they love and who don’t want to work forever.”

With all due respect to Ezra Klein, for whom I have the greatest respect and admiration, I don’t believe this is the correct framing of the issue. Instead, my view is that for most working people, it’s not so much an issue of whether they “love” their jobs or “want to work forever,” it’s that they’re sick, in pain, physically exhausted, needing to care for sick spouses or other loved ones, etc. In many cases, that’s why they NEED – not so much “want” – to retire. And that’s exactly what they’ve earned by paying into the system for decades. Sure, if everyone had office jobs that were mentally stimulating, not physically taxing, and financially (highly) rewarding, a lot more people would “want” to keep working until they’re 65, 70 or beyond. But most people – certainly those in the lower income brackets – don’t happen to have jobs like that. Perhaps the Blankfeins of the world would care to switch for a while, walk a mile in the other man’s moccasins so to speak, and then let us know what he thinks about raising the retirement age?

Bottom line: I have a quibble with Ezra Klein’s otherwise spot-on analysis. I have a lot more than a quibble with the Lloyd Blankfeins of the world.