Home Blog Page 2493

Virginia News Headlines: Sunday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, November 18. Also, note the graphic to the right, which shows that despite hysterical teahdist cries to “stop the spending,” in reality (something they’re not well connected with) federal government spending has grown the SLOWEST under President Obama in the past 60 years or so. Hmmmm.

*Israel Warns of ‘Expansion’ as Attack Widens to Media Sites

*Ron Barber defeats Martha McSally

in race for Giffords’s former seat


*States running out of money for roads, transit

*Did climate change controversy cause UVA’s sacking of Teresa Sullivan? (“The University of Virginia board that fired, then reinstated UVA’s president earlier this year owes us all a full account of its actions”)

*With election over, what’s next for coal?

*The gloves come off in Bolling-Cuccinelli race

*Marshall to renew social-issues push (“Ahead of the upcoming session that begins Jan. 9, Marshall has already filed legislation that would allow Virginia employers to opt out of contraception coverage in their health plans and another bill that would make it a felony for doctors to perform sex-selective abortions.”)

*Airports agency must clean house or face skyrocketing tolls

*Voters without proper ID were a small percentage of ballots cast

*Editorial: Downtown’s evolution

*The trouble with Virginia’s plates

*A growing Old Dominion University needs to expand – but how?

*Pr. William County Board chief proposes deep social service cuts

*Arlington buys building for offices, shelter

*Windfall a pleasant puzzle for Charlottesville

*Dulles Airport celebrates 50th birthday Saturday

*Wizards make history with loss to Jazz, 0-8 start

*D.C. area forecast: Still cool, but slightly warmer each day with 60+ possible by Thanksgiving

Photo: Cuccinelli-Allen Joint #FAIL

0

From Virginia Teapublican and former U.S. Senate candidate Jamie Radtke’s Facebook page: “So I get an invitation to attend a Cuccinelli fundraiser in my community, and look at the reply envelope they included for RSVP!! Seriously?!” Radtke also calls this “a huge amateur mistake.” LOL

Love the Maroney-Obama “‘Not Impressed’ Face” Photo

2



From Barack Obama’s Facebook page: “[Olympic gymnast] McKayla Maroney: ‘Did I just do the ‘Not impressed’ face with the President…?’ Yes.” So cool. Meanwhile, check out the clueless nincompoops at Politico and how they just made complete fools of themselves (although perhaps not as foolish as John McCain and Lindsay Graham, it’s a close competition…).

Virginia News Headlines: Saturday Morning

1

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, November 17.

*Petraeus’ Testimony Makes McCain and Other Conspiracy Theorists Look Like Idiots

*GOP Rep Admits CIA Approved U.N. Ambassador’s Talking Points On Libya  

*Romney becomes persona non grata to a shellshocked Republican party (And the next one who should become personal non grata is off-the-deep end, John “GET OFF MY LAWN” McCain.)

*Stop scapegoating Susan Rice (The attacks on Rice represent Republican illogic, hypocrisy and nastiness at their most extreme.)

*Congressional leaders say they are confident ‘fiscal cliff’ can be averted

*Federal cuts would take heavy toll on small contractors

*Why purple Va. is starting to look rather blue

*It’s hard to be over-the-top when criticizing voting delays

*Local leaders indicate support for Watkins’ transportation funding plan

*6th District Republican Committee “instructs” Bob Goodlatte to oppose John Boehner as House Speaker (Hahahahahaha.)

*After long lines of problems at polls, a long line of questions

*Warner, Connolly Introduce Voting Reform Legislation

*Virginia Board Stands Firm Against Cuccinelli (“Despite pressure from the attorney general, Board of Juvenile Justice refuses to ax protections for LGBT youth”)

*Group planning to file pardon petition to Virginia governor by next week

*Bolling: Tuesday’s lesson is the GOP needs to connect with moderates

*House panel berates MWAA board (I’ve been saying for years that MWAA’s no-bid contracts and cronyism were unacceptable, even corrupt. Nice to see Congress finally catching up…)

*William H. Wood, editor and advocate for civility in politics, dies

*Metro adds screens to kiosks to show train delays

P.S. Oh, and the most important story of the day: Who Killed Hostess Brands and Twinkies? (Short answer: it’s the corporate management, stupid.)

P.P.S. Also see The Iron Dome, Press Bias, and Israel’s Lack of Strategic Thinking.  

Video: Allen and Kaine Senior Advisors Talk Strategy, Money, “Total Crap” SuperPAC ads

5



Yesterday, I attended a post-election forum (“After Virginia Votes”) held at GMU Law School in Arlington between George Allen senior advisor Boyd Marcus and Tim Kaine senior advisor Mo Elleithee. The discussion lasted about an hour, and covered the 2012 Kaine-Allen race, as well as some thoughts on 2013. A few points that jumped out at me from this segment of the discussion (note: I’m still uploading parts 1 and 3; this is actually part 2) are as follows. Note that it got pretty colorful at times, with Marcus slamming his own “team,” broadly speaking, in language for more candid than we normally here from political consultants…

1. It’s fascinating to me, and not in a good way, that Marcus STILL has no compunction about their wildly irresponsible, false, Big Lie, whatever you want to say, use of “sequestration” to attack Tim Kaine. The fact is, this was a bipartisan effort, supported by Republicans like Bob McDonnell, Eric Cantor, etc., and which Tim Kaine had absolutely NOTHING to do with. The alternative at the time, by the way, was for the U.S. to default on its national debt, which would have been utterly disastrous. Whether Boyd Marcus understands this or doesn’t understand this, it really tells you a lot about the Allen campaign.

2. Marcus’ whining about a supposed lack of money to run ads  – largely attacking Tim Kaine – is just laughable. Basically, what he’s doing is trying to deflect responsibility for his candidate’s crushing loss from himself to Allen himself, for not raising enough money. Lame.

3. Marcus’ whining about having to go through a Republican primary, against what was in reality a field of nobodys, is also laughable. Excuses, excuses (note: last I checked, Jim Webb went through a brutal primary in 2006, was absolutely broke at the end, and beat Allen anyway – hmmmmm.)

4. After all that, Marcus seems to claim that the ads didn’t matter anyway, and that it all came down to “turnout.” Huh?

5. Marcus claims the RNC 72-hour model for getting voters out “doesn’t work.” Marcus says there “was a lot of activity going on…[but] most of it was pretty worthless…not very well done.” (note: this sounds to me like more blame-passing and excuses by Marcus)

6. Elleithee says the Kaine campaign had the best fundraising operation in the country, “born out of necessity” (because they knew how much of an “onslaught” they’d be facing from Crossroads, Americans for Prosperity, etc.). It’s hard to argue with that, given that – as Elleithee notes – there was over $30 million in outside spending against Tim Kaine; more money against any other candidate in the country except for one: Barack Obama. Wow.

7. Elleithee says the Kaine campaign felt at a “distinct disadvantage” in terms of spending throughout the entire campaign. They felt a “little bit better” at the end, but they started spending against Kaine 12 months out.

8. Elleithee argues that the Kaine campaign got more bang for their advertising buck in part by purchasing the ads earlier. That allowed them to lock in better ad placement and better rates, helping to compensate for the massive amount of money against Kaine coming in from outside groups.

9. Marcus correctly points out that the outside groups had to pay more for their ads.

10. Marcus says the outside ads were not helpful. Elleithee says it was “total crap.” In fact, Elleithee said he saw the ads and said “THANK YOU, there is no way that ad is going to convince one single voter to vote against Tim Kaine.” Marcus says there were a “couple” that were decent ads and “that followed the themes” of the Allen campaign, but “well over half” didn’t follow the Allen campaign’s messaging and were “not well done.”

11. Elleithee says that Allen’s refusal to agree to Kaine’s offer to try to limit outside groups spending probably ended up helping Kaine in the end. “I was afraid you were going to say yes, because I was counting on these outside groups being as bad as they were.”

12. Marcus says they “had no idea what was really going to come in from the outside,” that those ads didn’t “make it worse” for Allen, it just “was a lot of wasted money.” The key, according to Marcus, is having someone in the SuperPAC who actually knows what’s going on in the particular state they’re running the ad in, not “just somebody sitting in New York who makes an ad.”

13. According to Elleithee, some of the best outside group ads were from the RNC and DNC.

14. Marcus says the Chamber of Commerce ads were “just about the worst” of the outside group ads, “really cookie cutter stuff.”

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, November 16.

*What Benghazi Is about: Scandal Envy (“Republicans are livid that Obama hasn’t had his major scandal yet.” Or even a minor one, really. Meanwhile, John McCain’s livid because he lost the election in 2008, because he’s politically irrelevant, and because, well, GET OFF MY LAWN!!!! LOL)

*CIA talking points for Susan Rice called Benghazi attack “spontaneously inspired” by protests (In other words, Republicans ranting and raving about Benghazi are actually attacking the CIA and Gen. Petraeus. Note also that none of these Republicans were “outraged” over Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, or any of the other intelligence fiascos in the Bush administration. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, it’s ok if you’re a Republican – IOKIYAR.)

*Romney’s contempt, continued. (It’s truly astounding that someone with this much contempt for the American people could have been the presidential nominee for a major U.S. political party. WTF?)

*What the future of Virginia looks like

*Editorial: A last-minute reprieve (“Give Bob McDonnell his extension only if he and other GOP governors are serious about insurance exchanges.”)

*McAuliffe names key members of campaign team

*Senator-elect Kaine names chief of staff, transition team

*Va. senators receive cautionary report on state finances at Charlottesville retreat

*Poll: McDonnell remains popular, scores well with women, young voters

*Sen. Warner proposes bill to spark voting reforms in states

*Allen, Kaine advisers look back at hard-fought Virginia Senate race (I was there as well, should have some video later today. For now, let’s just say that Boyd Marcus was a lame excuse a minute. Also, if their “internals” really showed Allen up 5 points on Kaine in the closing weeks of the election, they are/were smoking some powerful stuff. LOL)

*George Allen adviser: Romney’s Virginia effort was ‘worthless’ (Marcus also slammed the Chamber of Commerce and other outside groups, said that Allen wasn’t at all helped by Republicans in the Virginia General Assembly and their crazy bills – like “transvaginal ultrasound” – etc. Fun stuff.)

*Kaine, Allen Advisors: SuperPAC Ads Were ‘Total Crap’ (“Elleithee said the negative ads paid for by outside groups actually helped Kaine.” I agree, what a complete waste of money by Karl Rove, etc.)

*Airports authority often warned about contracts

*Norfolk houses will have to rise

*North Arlington man spearheads effort to help N.Y. victims of Sandy

*Plans for special meeting regarding Delgaudio cancelled

*Homeless shelter still divides Arlington residents, officials

Let’s End Gerrymandering Now

4

( – promoted by lowkell)

On November 6, Virginia’s presidential vote went to the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, by about 4 percentage points.  The Senate seat went to the Democratic candidate, Tim Kaine, by almost 6 percent.  At the same time, in the eleven congressional races, all of the incumbents won-eight Republicans and three Democrats.  

Does that mean that huge numbers of Virginians were splitting their votes?  Not really.  Nearly six percent more Virginians voted for Democrats in the races for the House of Representatives than voted for Republicans.

How can it be that with less than half of the votes the Republicans won more than two-thirds of the House seats?

A big part of the answer can be given in one word:  gerrymandering.  That’s the process by which politicians and political parties draw district boundaries in order to achieve the results that they want.

Those boundaries are redrawn every ten years, after each Census, by state legislatures.  The election of 2010 was a huge win for the Republicans in the states, as well as nationally. In most of the nation, redistricting was tilted to help elect Republicans.

And it worked.  What happened in the Virginia congressional races happened nationally as well.  The Republicans will retain a sizeable majority in the House of Representatives – 233 to 195 (with seven still in doubt)-even though nationwide, Democratic candidates received a half million more votes than their Republican opponents. (Republicans claim that they won some sort of “mandate” by winning a majority of seats in the House, but you can have no mandate if a majority of the people voted against you.)

And yet gerrymandering is not a partisan issue.  Politicians of America’s major parties have been doing this for two centuries, Democrats as well as Republicans. Ultimately, gerrymandering is not so much about one political party doing wrong to the other, but about the political class doing wrong to the American people.

Politicians gerrymander in order to gain more power.  Power is a zero-sum game, meaning that one player can gain only if another loses.  The power that the politicians and parties gain is power that the people lose.

People lose power because districts are made non-competitive. As has been said before, elected officials determine their voters rather than vice-versa. The result is less choice for the people, and often politicians who stay in office for decades.

It’s time to put an end to gerrymandering.  

In the 21st century, it would be easy to take the politics out of redistricting.  A computer using one algorithm for each of the states could crank out a set of boundaries that plays no favorites. (Begin in a specified corner for each state – e.g. the southwest-and proceed precinct by precinct by set rules until the necessary numbers of people are contained and then draw the boundary, and proceed to draw the next.)

The power taken from the political class would be returned to the people, for whom our whole system of government was established.

The House was the part of government that our founders wanted to be most responsive to the people.  That’s why everyone in the House of Representatives must go back to the people every two years.  And yet the House is the one part of our national system where power can be stolen from the people by gerrymandering. You can’t gerrymander a Senate seat, because the Senate is statewide and there’s no redistricting to do.  You can’t gerrymander the presidential race, because that’s nationwide, and governed by electoral votes cast state-by-state.

But the congressional districts get redrawn every ten years, and that creates a vulnerability in our democracy.

It’s time to close off that opening for corruption.  Let’s do it now when no one knows who will benefit and who will lose from having an honest system in 2021, when it’s time to redistrict again.

Although we can’t predict now whether this improvement in our democracy will benefit Democrats or Republicans, we do know that it will benefit the people of the United States.

**************

Andy Schmookler, formerly a candidate for Congress, is the author of, among other books, the award-winning The Parable of the Tribes: The Problem of Power in Social Evolution.  He lives in Shenandoah County, Virginia.

Will Cuccinelli investigate Rove and his illegal Crossroads GPS??

0

Check out this article over on Think Progress:

http://thinkprogress.org/justi…

Seems as though Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS may not be a legal organization.

When Karl Rove’s Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (GPS) formed in 2010, it established its official address in Warrenton, VA, and registered with the Internal Revenue Service a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) “social welfare organization.” It apparently did not, however, register as a charitable organization with the Commonwealth of Virginia, as appears was legally required.

According to state code, non-profit groups that intend to solicit contributions must first register with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Office of Charitable and Regulatory Programs.

Do we need to call this to Cooch’s attention and demand that he investigate Rove??  

Angry John Is at It Again, Only Worse

13

Except when he laughs nervously about bombing Iran, John McCain is an angry man. When isn’t he angry? And when don’t we know about it? God knows he’s been given enough platform to let Americans know about each and every McCain outrage. There’s hardly a microphone he doesn’t attach himself to.

McCain is one of the most often-invited guests on the male and GOP-dominated Sunday morning talk show circuit. Since he lost in 2008 you’d think he’d be back-burnered as the irrelevant, bigoted, out of touch “white” man that he is.  But noooooooo.

And now comes word that it’s happened again. Amazingly, McCain skipped a briefing on Benghazi to to claim that the White House wasn’t informing Congress sufficiently about it. Maybe he should have gone to the briefing.  But he didn’t. Instead…

He expressed outrage about the supposed failures of Susan Rice, supposed because McCain’s version of Rice’s statements were ill-informed and just plain wrong. But when there’s a conclusion to jump to, Johhny is at the ready.

John McCain claimed Susan Rice “isn’t that bright.” This from the man who nominated the imbecilic Sarah Palin for his Vice Presidential nominee. Rice, whose Ph.D is from Oxford University, is hardly stupid. Contrast that with McCain who graduated near the bottom of his class of over 800. And yet there is McCain questioning Dr. Susan Rice’s intelligence and fitness to serve at State.

Hopefully, the voters of Arizona will finally give John McCain the boot.  He doesn’t believe in in actually serving them as their representative in Washington. He refuses to bring home the bacon (i.e., jobs). He’s been pretty damn stupid (i.e. not that bright) in the Senate, especially in the past four years. And he’s got “angry white dude” written all over him. (No literalists among his supporters, that is not to be taken literally.)

Video: Under Persistent Questioning by Journalists, GOP’s B.S. “Case” Against Susan Rice Collapses

0



It’s truly a thing of beauty to watch journalists – wait for it – DO THEIR JOB for a change! It’s also a thing of beauty to watch as, in doing their job, it utterly demolishes a b.s. argument by irresponsible, grandstanding, hypocritical politicians (in this case, Republicans like the angry, raging, hysterical, hyperpartisan John McCain and Lindsey Graham). Thank you, Soledad O’Brien, for doing what journalists SHOULD be doing 24/7. Attention other journalists: are you watching this?!?