Home Blog Page 2835

Finally, Authorities Pursuing the Real “Climategate” Crooks

2

Cuccinelli’s crusade to criminalize climate science clipped by cops confronting the correct crooks!

Yes, a mere two years after thieves with obvious ulterior motives hacked hundreds of thousands of emails from the University of East Anglia, police in the UK and US are now investigating the crime.

It’s about freaking time. The climate scientists allegedly implicated by these emails have been cleared by no less than 9 investigations finding no wrongdoing whatsoever on their part. Of course, it is possible that the investigators, ranging from the UK House of Commons to the US Department of Commerce Inspector General to Penn State U. to East Anglia to the National Science Foundation, are all part of the vast conspiracy. But…I kinda doubt it.

It makes a lot more sense to investigate the hackers in this case, who had the capability and resources to break into the University’s system, target and steal emails from specific climate scientists, cull through the full 200,000+ of them to find the ones that could be the most easily twisted and misrepresented to fulfill the agenda of the Fossil Fuel Lobby, and then skillfully release them in two batches, both before major international climate summits, in an obvious attempt to influence global climate policy. And gosh, don’t you wonder where they might have gotten those resources? (Hmmm…)

Last I heard, stealing was a crime – not to mention one of the “Thou shalt nots” of the Ten Commandments. And it is the job of the police to find and prosecute criminals – not to harass researchers.  

Which brings me back to Cuccinelli and his endless, insane and expensive legal assault on the University of Virginia based solely on loony climate denial conspiracies. It’s really sad that while law enforcement officials elsewhere focus their time on actually fighting injustice, Virginia’s top cop spends his time creating injustice. Courtesy of your tax dollars, of course.

Let’s hope that UK and US law enforcement authorities find the real culprits and their donors, expose their cynical acts, and put them behind bars. And let’s make sure that our next Governor and Attorney General enforce the rule of law rather than bending the law to pursue unconstitutional ideological boondoggles.

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

9

Here are a few Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, December 16. Also, check out the Blue Virginia poll results, which show Terry McAuliffe in the lead for the 2013 Democratic gubernatorial nomination among Blue Virginia readers, with Tom Perriello close behind, and Chap Petersen a notch back. Of course, given this news, it’s highly unlikely that Tom Perriello will be running anytime soon in Virginia. Still, congratulations to Tom, that’s an awesome gig and I’m sure he’ll do great, progressive things at the Center for American Progress Action Fund! 🙂 Oh, and essentially NOBODY wants Ward Armstrong to run for governor as a Democrat. Maybe as a Republican?

*As Romney Steps Cautiously, Gingrich Duels With Others (I did not watch the freak/clown show last night, how about you?)

*Spending deal reached, averting shutdown

*Pete Snyder mulls Virginia lieutenant governor bid (Another anti-gay-rights, anti-women’s choice, McDonnell/Kookinelli ideological soulmate comes out of the woodwork. And he’s rich too, not to mention a former associate of Frank “Contract ON America” Luntz. Oh joy.)

*Gillespie eyeing statewide bid in ’13? (20 gazillion Republican’ts thinking about running in 2013, and on the Democratic side??? Crickets.)

*McDonnell announces bonus for state employees – sort of

*McDonnell recommends $2.2 billion for Virginia Retirement System

*McDonnell announces bonus for state employees – sort of (Of course, it comes with significant strings attached.)

*McDonnell readies Va. budget plan (The cuts are coming, the only question is how large they’ll be, and to which parts of the budget. This could be nasty.)

*Perriello to work for think tank

*Post-debate, Kaine tops Allen in new poll

*McDonnell’s wife, daughter have cameo in new Spielberg flick (I’m sure it’s 100% because of their superb acting abilities. Heh.)

*Fairfax County School Board approves indoor video surveillance cameras in high schools

*McDonnell wants schools to restrict tuition increases

*Feds fund Va. HOT lanes, but not bike paths

*Rasoul to challenge Bowers for Roanoke mayor

*Metro: Congress has six days to act on federal transit benefits

*Angel Cabrera Named GMU President

*Fairfax Station punks smash Christmas display (Budding young sociopaths, I hope they catch them!)

P.S. Also, Christopher Hitchens, Vanity Fair writer and sharp provocateur, dies.

Should Occupy Declare Victory and Go Home?

0

Two events last week reassured the Occupy moment of its effectiveness. The first, and most covered, was the President's much-ballyhooed speech in Osawatomie, Kansas on December 6th; he echoed a number of themes present in the “New Nationalism” speech given in the same town by President Theodore Roosevelt as he prepared to run for a 3rd term under the Progressive Party banner. Both speeches spoke of a desire to end the pay-to-play, business interest-dictated behavior in Washington. While this represented a new level of thinking for the evolving politics of TR at the time, it hearkened back to speeches from the 2008 campaign trail for Obama. It wasn't anything terribly new, in this respect.

What has gotten the most play in the media has been the direct nature in which the President addressed issues of income inequality in the speech. He made the case that income inequality hurts us all. When the old columns that held up Fordism (the ability for workers to buy the products or services they produce) and the few elements of the welfare state that we have here collapse, we end up with a nation that serves the interests of the top 1% as opposed to the other 99% of us.

Now, hold on a second. Does this mean Obama gets the central tenant of Occupy Wall Street and its kindred movements? To the extent that OWS has defined its central tenants (disclosure: I have been a fierce critic of the unwillingness, deliberately or not, to formulate a political program for OWS), it does seem to be articulating a clear belief that income inequality hurts us all. And Obama’s speech doesn't come at a time when the Occupy movement is enjoying runaway success in the eyes of the mainstream media. What media sympathy the movement might have had at the start has dissipated, not due to a dislike for the message, but rather due to confusion by the masses of Americans who haven't “Occupied” as to what the motives of the movement are. All they've seen recently are the pictures of the park evictions, the pepper spray, and, if you live in the Washington, DC area, destruction of one small house.

This brings us to the second important, symbolic event of the last week. For the uninitiated: Occupy DC has been set up in a park supervised by the National Parks Service since early October. The site has been covered with tents for most of its life as a flashpoint in DC and American politics. The DC City Council has supported the occupation, and the NPS has largely left the alone. However, at some point last week, it was decided that Occupy DC would have to leave its park, much like Occupy Wall Street and many other Occupies before it. But by the time this decision was made, Occupy DC had entered a new phase: a house (or fort, or shelter, depending on who you ask) had been constructed on the site by Occupiers. Negotiations with building inspectors failed; a General Assembly Meeting to discuss the immediate future of the Occupation produced only allowance for “autonomous actions” by individuals who wished to make a statement in the face of the coming raid. Subsequently, police descended, and the structure would come down. Prior to this- there was a stand-off. Some Occupiers remained on the roof of the structure, refusing to leave, with one guy apparently remaining on top for 8 hours. Police finally had to pull them off using a cherry picker. What did all of this accomplish? What did it mean?

Some have theorized that this was meant to draw attention to the foreclosure and eviction crises happening daily in our neighborhoods. Others, including Dave Weigel of Slate.com (an even handed guy, despite being a former Reason magazine correspondent) have labeled it, simply, performance art. It's hard not to see much of this event as such. There was the house built in a National Park. One guy peed off the side of the house (some witnesses say it was because he legitimately had to go). Another shook his ass at the police for some time. Another was apparently well-known as a guy who once circumsized himself for a public art installation. I'm sure plenty of people disagree with the characterization of this event as performance art, but to the casual observer, it was at best “autonomous action” artwork, and at worst a collective freakout by a bunch of hippies. Do I wish people saw it as some sort of statement on housing issues? Sure, if that's what Occupy wanted to portray. But it's not important at this point.

If Occupy is to continue to be a cultural phenomenon with a political conscious, it's going to have to move out of the parks and play to its momentum. The conversation has been completely flipped. There was no expensive ad campaign. No barnstorming politicians. There was a Canadian magazine, but how many people showed up in these parks because of them and not because of the 99% message? It's that message that has become for our political discourse what debt and deficits were this past summer during the Debt Ceiling Crisis. The president has now given a major speech centered on that theme, one that will probably go into the archives next to his one from the 2004 DNC. Occupy didn't have a political program or a set of demands, but it had a message. That message is at the core of our political discourse (as long as we can peel people away from “shocking” entertainment-news like Michelle Bachman's latest thoughts on the gays or how Muppets are communist or whatever else bored Fox producers shove on us), and if the park phase, where the 99% message started, is over, then it's time to declare victory.

Even if Occupy heroically survives the cold winter, the story won't be the message, it will be the spectacle. The spectacle brings attention, much like the Occupy DC performance art, but the message will still be the same regardless. Continuing on as performance art risks turning Occupy into a new Yippie movement. I loved the Yippies for their sheer guts and sense of humor, but they were the comic wing of a larger New Left, and the New Left was collectively despised (or at ignored) by Middle America, blue collar joes, white collar stiffs, suburban housewives, rednecks, and the fracturing working and middle class of the early 1970s. In other words, most of the 99% didn't stand them. Before Occupy loses this moment in the sun, where even a president who very well could have taken December 6th to raise money from Goldman Sachs, rather than to channel the early 20th century Progressive, it's time to declare victory on the major central tenant of the 99% movement and move on to the next phase.

Newttron bomb will kill Allen: Romney his only chance

1

by Paul Goldman

While one never wants to make too much of polling roughly one year out, it doesn’t take Sir Isaac Newton to see the political laws in motion in Virginia right now. The GOP attacks on federal workers may be good politics in Florida or even in North Carolina, but they has compounded the Republican problems in NOVA, the key battleground in the 2012 presidential election.

I can’t prove the following but it is true nonetheless: Newt Gingrich, despite living in NOVA, can not overcome the negative image with federal workers he created for himself by pushing the government shutdown during his Speakership.

Gingrich might be able to sell the New Newt in other parts of the country, but not to the highly educated folks in NOVA. To them, he is now and will always be the Old Newt.

In fact, Gingrich will get wiped out in NOVA so badly, it will take George Allen with him.  Guaranteed — you heard it first here. Newt could put McDonnell on the ticket, he could put George Mason too; it wouldn’t matter, as the Newttron bomb will leave too big a hole in the VA GOP for the former Speaker to get the state’s 13 electoral votes. This doesn’t preclude him from winning the White House, as there are ways for the GOP to get to 270 without our electoral votes — although wouldn’t be easy.

However, Newt simply can’t win Virginia. Obama/Kaine stomps Gingrich/Allen in 2012. Take it to the bank.  

 

As for Romney:  He might be a lot stronger in VA than he looks now. Why?

Once free of the Tea Party and the right wing of the Republican Party, Romney can concentrate on winning the general, allowing the former Bay State Governor to morph into the Harvard MBA-JD, more mellow, gel-haired, not-really-so-conservative, suburban-friendly guy he had to be to get elected Governor of Massachusetts. Romney is way more conservative than he claimed to be up North, but not nearly as over-the-edge as some of his stands have been as he works to win the GOP nomination.

Now, if Gingrich, Ron Paul, etc. can force Romney into WW1-style trench warfare, then it might be too late to fix the damage after the nomination fight. But assuming this doesn’t happen, Mitt Romney won’t be toxic in NOVA.

What makes Virginia different right now than other swing states is the white, college-educated voter. Virginia has a high percentage of these folks, and this is key swing vote open to Democrats right now. Everyone else has basically chosen up sides.

The swing voter in VA is okay with the President’s values, his family, his 21st-century persona. They might not be hugely positive, but they are positive enough to vote for him again. Gingrich is a throwback: been there, done that; didn’t like it then, don’t like it now either.

Romney is a different story, at least potentially.

So, if sentiment in swing vogters goes south on the President, then Romney can gain. But nothing can help Gingrich.

George Allen’s problem is that he was good with white, college-educated folks in 1993, less so in 2000, even less so in 2006. There is no reason to think this vector has changed direction, especially against a guy like Tim Kaine, who was Warner’s sidekick. Tim is perfect for white, college educated voters: moderate, smart, no drama, good government, a nice person, live and let live.  

In a non-presidential year, George Allen would still have trouble, since he remains fixated on trying to revive the 1990s look, which is retro now. It is a good schtick, but the state has changed enough that it is not enough to win, even with all things going just right.  

But with Gingrich weighing Allen down, Kaine wins with room to spare.

Allen needs Romney because that opens up the possibility of McDonnell as VP; no way Gingrich takes the VA Governor.

As I say: The fact Kaine has a 5-point lead right now is not all that useful, especially since the poll was skewed a little toward his kind of voter. Both men have roughly the same image, so that would spell a 50-50 race all things considered.

However, it is a presidential year. The Old Newt haunts the New Newt in Nova. Newt would lose big there, taking Allen down at the same time. The polls show that, clearly.

What does George Allen do? He said he was going to stay out of the GOP presidential race. That’s his choice. But if his network isn’t going with Romney, they are just voting for Kaine at this point.  

Rep. Eric Cantor Named Earth’s #2 Enemy in Congress

6

Rep. John Boehner,  Rep. Eric CantorThe Los Angeles Times editorial board has named the “10 most powerful and outspoken opponents of clean air, clean water, conservation and climate action.” Number two is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA):

2. Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va. The House Majority Leader released a memo in late August listing the top 10 “job-destroying regulations” his party would battle in the remainder of the congressional session. Seven were environmental rules opposed by the fossil fuel industry, including restrictions on emissions from industrial boilers and cement plants, and proposed rulemaking on smog, farm soot and greenhouse gases. None of these rules really threaten jobs, but failing to approve them would certainly threaten lives.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) has rightly called this year’s group, led by House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) & Rep. Cantor, “the most anti-environment House in the history of Congress.” A new report from Rep. Waxman, Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) & Rep. Howard Berman (R-CA) details 191 House GOP votes targeting our air, water, wildlife & public health – an average of more than one anti-conservation bill per day the House has been in session.

And the number of job creation bills? Oh, right.

Better Choices for Virginia Rallies for a Better Budget

0

Crossposted at ProgressVA.

signed petition.jpgThe Better Choices for Virginia Coalition, of which ProgressVA is a member, gathered in Richmond today to tell Governor McDonnell that Virginians need a budget plan with a balanced approach that cuts tax loopholes and not jobs.Their release reports,

“With the Governor preparing to unveil his plan for the upcoming budget next week, the more than 40 organizations that comprise the growing Better Choices coalition want him to protect and create jobs instead of making deep cuts to schools, health care, public safety and other key building blocks for a strong economy.”

Better Choices not only presented the Governor today with an enlarged petition, signed by today’s rally’s attendees, but also with more than 1,300 petitions signed by Virginians from across the Commonwealth calling for a balanced approach to the budget. McDonnell’s cuts-only mentality threatens Virginia families and hurts our economic recovery.

Virginia Budget Facts:

  • Virginia has a roughly $1 billion gap over the next 2 years and relying on a cuts-only approach to essential services will likely hurt Virginia’s ability to create jobs and grow the economy. (Better Choices for Virginia, December 15, 2011)
  • Governor McDonnell’s budget proposal will impose a greater burden on local governments who are already struggling, that “are already strapped and which are responsible for critical vital services like public education, public safety, and public health. Local governments cannot afford to absorb this. To use an overused expression, it is an ‘unfunded mandate.'” (Sen. Donald McEachin, Blue Virginia, December 15, 2011)
  • Tax breaks for yacht owners: Virginia taxes watercraft sales at a reduced rate compared to other goods and caps the total amount at $2,000, giving away massive tax breaks to owners of expensive yachts, while working families pay the full sales tax on everything they buy. (The Commonwealth Institute)
  • In 2008, 64% of Virginia corporations paid no corporate income tax. (The Commonwealth Institute)



better va 1.JPG

better va 3.JPG

better va2.JPG

PPP: Kaine 47%-Allen 42%; Kaine 49%-Radtke 33%

8

So, not only is President Obama looking good in Virginia, but so is Tim Kaine (not surprisingly given that finding, not to mention Felix’s gaffe-ridden debate performance the other day. Check it out.

After getting good reviews for his performance in the first debate of the race last week Tim Kaine has finally gained a little separation in what has been a deadlocked Virginia Senate contest.  He now leads George Allen 47-42.

When PPP polled this race for the first time this year in February it was dead even. The main difference between then and now comes with independents: what was a 9 point lead for Allen early in the year at 50-41 is a now 4 point advantage for Kaine at 43-39…

Oh, and just in case Jamie Radtke pulls a miracle and defeats Felix Macacawitz for the Republican’t nomination, she’d lose by 16 points (49%-33%). All in all, 2012 is looking to be a much better year than we’ve experienced recently. Now, let’s get to work and make sure that happens!

McDonnell says that public safety trumps economics of uranium mining

2

Cross-posted from Article XI

On Tuesday, Gov. Bob McDonnell stated that public safety overrides the possible economic gains stemming from uranium mining in Southside VA. For Virginians in the south, this is particularly good news. For the commonwealth as a whole, this should also come as a breath of fresh air (literally).

While Gov. McDonnell’s announcement is far from a renouncement of uranium mining in Southside VA, it does leave the door open for the status quo on the uranium mining ban to hold.

For the past two years in particular, Virginia Uranium has thrown a slew of lobbyists into the legislative mix to influence VA legislators regarding their decisions on whether or not to lift the ban on uranium mining.

With all of the lobbyists hounding at the doors of VA legislators, however, the decision on whether to retain the ban may come down to the concern Virginians publicly show towards uranium mining.

If Virginians concerned about the possible human and environmental consequences get involved in the debate over uranium mining, and in particular voice their concerns to their respective legislators, then the default position on lifting the ban may fall towards the status quo.

For anyone in VA who doesn’t feel like they have or will have a voice in this debate, I’d like them to know that they do. In fact, your involvement may be the difference between an environmental and human health disaster and a more reasoned approach towards uranium mining in VA.

So please take a few minutes out of your day to get involved and let your voice be heard. Virginia still has a republican form of government and ultimately your concerns do matter.  

“No Labels,” More False Equivalence

8

Look who is supposedly coming to Washington, according to a recent article here, as if many of the leaders of this organization haven’t been there all along. No Labels is full of partisan insiders preaching Republican-style corporatism. It’s members of whatever party, long for “compassionate conservatism.” We learned there really is no such a thing. If anything the Bush years made a lie of the oxymoronic term.  

Moreover, evidence disputing real bipartisanship is No Labels’ inclusion of the worst Democrats ever. If there is incivility in Congress, it is party their fault. If there is incivility toward the president, ditto. Consider just three of the Dems involved:

Joe Lieberman; Evan Bayh; Ben Nelson

These pretend Dems do not exemplify bipartisanship as much as capitulation to an unyielding Republican agenda. As the American Prospect article shows, the members are all right of center. You can count on Nelson to vote against everything Democrats propose. Bayh is married to a health care insurance executive (a vice president of one) and his work on health care “reform,” not surprisingly, favored insurance companies. It was a metaphor for everything Bayh has done while in Congress.  He retired from the Senate in 2010. And now, here he comes to force his roll-over-and-play-dead message on we progressives by any other means. And, what do you say about Joe-Mentum (his nickname for momentum) except that his only momentum is in the wrong direction. Throw in such GOP stalwarts as Mark McKinnnon, Bush’s former go-to campaign media person.  Now he’s the Global Vice Chairman for Hill and Knowlton, you know, the PR firm engineering the fake story of babies being thrown from incubators onto the floor in Pre-Desert Storm Iraq. It was a terrible lie to move Americans to support Desert Storm. (McKinnon is not responsible for that campaign but the campaign shows how H & K operates.)    

Though once a Democrat who supported Ann Richards in Texas, McKinnon eventually became a good friend of George W. Bush. When President Obama appeared to be the Democratic nominee in 2008, McKinnon said he would sit out the election. He apparently did not want to be the linch pin in the expected GOP media assault on Obama. Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate that.  However, it is not clear that McKinnon completely stuck to this pledge. If he did not, some reports suggest he chose to advise quietly, including reportedly coaching Palin for her debate with Joe Biden. No Labels only appears “moderate” contrasted to TeaPublican crazies (Bachmann, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, etc) currently running for the president on the GOP ticket (and some who dropped out (Cain and Trump). McKinnon seems like a likable guy. But he was pivotal in bringing us George W. Bush and the entire sham that his “compassionate” side turned out to be.

Kiki McLean, who is often seen on cable “news’ channels, hails from Porter Novelli, co-founded by William D Novelli, the former CEO of AARP.  This is troubling because of Novelli’s trojan horse role at AARP. Novelli infamously wrote the preface to a book Newt Gingrich wrote to end traditional Medicare and force the privatization of it. Read this article about what he was up to while pretending to care about members of AARP. While purportedly looking out for the interests of AARP, he was enmeshed with Peter Peterson, the Concord Coalition, and  Koch-Brothers folks seeking to gut Social Security and Medicare. And he infamously suggested he could deliver AARP membership to the GOP. Given this background, I doubt Kiki’s “compassion” cred.  

Bill Bloomfield, John McCain’s field director is involved too. How progressive can that be? Jonathan Cowan, founder of Third Way and former Congressman Tom Davis (R-VA) are No Labels members. Robert S. Kaplan, former VP of Goldman Sachs is another. There are some Clintonistas as well,but ALL of them are oriented toward the “practical solutions” being more favorable to corporations over people.

Additionally, as indicated above, any time there is clamoring for “civility,” you can bet the talk is directed toward getting Democrats to cave. Just be nice.  Just be friends with Republicans. Go to lunch with them. Meet their families. Can’t we all just get along? Now just do what the Republicans say. If Obama negotiates beginning with what he thinks he can end up with, and that is how the President negotiates, they’ll say he didn’t practice enough give-and-take.

The Congressional stalemates threatening once again to shut down government are NOT equally both sides’ fault. The GOP puts numerous poison pills in a bill to simply continue to fund government and then it blames Dems for GOP designed obstruction. We live in a world of GOP scorched-earth campaigns and practices.  Being nice in return just won’t cut it.

No Labels say they will begin with Congress and the candidates in 2012.  They imply therefore  involvement in a presidential race is yet to come.  (Personally, I do not believe it.  So the rest of this paragraph is admittedly speculation.)  If they do get involved, The real question is whom, if anyone, will they advance for the White House?  I’m guessing it is Jeb Bush, the son who lost out when brother GW pushed his way to the front of the Bush line.  By enlisting Katherine Harris, Jeb helped to rig 2000 for the benefit of his bro.  He therefore helped destroy the right to vote for tens of thousands of legally registered Americans, and almost single-handedly destroyed public education in Florida (ginning up for profit “education” and destroying teachers for the greater glory and enrichment of his other bros). Whomever the choice, you can count on one thing, it will not be a progressive. The person will have deep corporate ties and deeper pockets still. And BTW, McKinnon’s guy (GW) ran the government train into one giant train wreck. No matter how good McKinnon’s word-smithing sounds now, remember that much.

The “can’t we all get along” meme is just one more weaselly way to destroy progressivism and the 99%.  They never ask the TeaPublicans to knock off their extreme statements.  But they are quick to pretend Democrats even come close to the comparable incivility.  Ultimately, though, you cannot remain “civil” when the other side is trying to destroy you. So the McKinnon poppycock is one more way to try to silence Dems from standing up for themselves.  

VA Dems Blast McDonnell’s VRS Plan as “unfunded mandate,” Forcing Cuts to Kids, Seniors’ Healthcare

6

This morning, Bob McDonnell released his plan to supposedly shore up the Virginia Retirement System (VRS). In fact, McDonnell’s proposals are more of the usual smoke, mirrors, accounting tricks, and utter evasion of responsibility that have characterized his entire governorship to this point (how he can be popular simply boggles the mind; at best, you could argue the guy’s accomplished absolutely nothing).

In response to McDonnell’s latest irresponsibility, Virginia Democrats are piling on. According to Sen. Donald McEachin’s (D-Henrico) office:

{McDonnell’s proposal} is yet another effort to impose more of a burden on local governments, which are already strapped and which are responsible for critical vital services like public education, public safety, and public health. Local governments cannot afford to absorb this. To use an overused expression, it is an ‘unfunded mandate.’

As Ben points out at NLS, “local governments {have} only two options to meet this massive unfunded state mandate- raising property taxes or slashing county spending on schools, police, fire, parks and other local needs.” Meanwhile, Ben adds, the VRS is “a disaster from the General Assembly underfunding it,” and now instead of actually raising the money to properly fund it, McDonnell and the Republian’ts are “passing the buck on to localities.” Disgraceful.

For his part, Del. Scott Surovell (D-Mt. Vernon) weighs in with several points (and questions). First, “how is {McDonnell} gonna pay for this?” Second, “We’re giving an extra $200M to Higher Ed, Jacking up VRS contributions, taking $110 [million] from General Fund to pay for roads, and now fully funding VRS?” Third, that inevitably means “Cut healthcare for kids & low-income seniors (Medicaid).” Fourth, Surovell notes that Republicans claimed “there wasn’t a problem” with VRS at all. Hmmm. Surovell concludes:

VRS is massively underfunded because the General Assembly has not been following the VRS’ Trustees’ advice for most of the last two decades.

The situation we are in now is akin to you financial advisor telling you to put away $400/mo. for college when your first kid is born, only doing $200/mo. and then being surprised when you don’t have the money to pay for college.  

There’s no question everyone needs to step up to make VRS solvent, the real question is where do we come up with the money to do it.  

Yes, indeed, that IS the real question. We also know the real answer(s), as (presumably) does Bob McDonnell. The problem with the latter is that he’s a right-wing ideologue, jockeying for the national Republican ticket, and without the courage to buck his own party in any case. I mean, seriously, what else would we expect from the guy who put Fred Malek – found liable for ripping off Connecticut’s pension system to the tune of $75 million – in charge of his “reform” committee? Duhhhhh.

Governor McDonnell to Propose Largest Employer Contribution to VRS in History

Budget will Call for State and Local Governments to Greatly Increase Annual Employer Contributions Into VRS

Employer Contribution for State Employees for FY2013/2014 is Record $596.9 Million

RICHMOND – Building on the important reforms to the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) which passed the General Assembly during the 2010 and 2011 Sessions, Governor Bob McDonnell announced today that his proposed biennial budget will recommend a total of $2.21 billion in employer contributions to state employee and teacher funds by state and local governments – the largest employer contribution to VRS in history. The recommended employer contribution for state employees alone for FY2013/2014 is a record $596.9 million.  The Governor’s budget will fully fund the projections made by the VRS actuary, with the exception of the VRS rate of return which is funded at the level normally used by the General Assembly.  The budget will also fully fund the next installments of the 10-year payback of previously deferred contributions.  According to JLARC’s review released December 12th, in the past two years, from 2009 to 2011, the gap between the VRS liabilities and assets on hand to pay such liabilities increased 69 percent from $11.8 billion to $19.9 billion.

Speaking about the VRS funding proposal, Governor McDonnell remarked, “The plain truth is our state retirement system is underfunded, and this situation threatens the system’s long term solvency.  We must fund VRS at substantially higher levels so benefits will be there for the hardworking teachers, police officers, firefighters, state employees – our neighbors, friends and family members – who are depending on the system for their retirements. To do this, our budget will propose the largest employer contribution to the Virginia Retirement System in history, recommending a total of $2.21 billion in new funding to the systems for state employees and teachers.  This much needed increase more than doubles the employer contributions from the FY2011/2012 budget.  We cannot afford to wait in addressing this issue – the time to act is now.  We are doing that.  This historic new investment will begin to reverse the downward spiral VRS has been on and get us back on a path to revival.  It is a major step towards reducing the system’s unfunded liabilities and increasing the fund’s long-term security and stability.  More reforms must be made during the legislative session to get our retirement system in a stronger position.  I will not pass on a broken system to another governor.”

           Senator Walter Stosch (R-Henrico), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, added, “I applaud the Governor’s proposal to address the chronic shortfalls in VRS contribution levels.  Virginia is blessed to have hundreds of thousands of dedicated and hard-working state and local employees, and we must work now to ensure that their retirement is secure and solvent.  This investment is an important part of protecting their retirement, minimizing the unfunded liability and fulfilling Virginia’s commitment to our state workforce.”

Governor McDonnell’s VRS Funding Proposal:

Fully funds the regular contribution rates, assuming an 8.0 percent rate of return, 2.5 percent inflation, and 30-year amortization.

These are the same assumptions as used by the VRS actuary, with the exception of the rate of return which is set at the rate normally used by the General Assembly.

The total VRS rate is 8.76 percent for state employees and 11.66 percent for teachers, of which 1.0 percent and 1.43 percent, respectively, are included for the payback of deferred contributions.

These numbers assume payroll for state employees as of July 1, 2011 and total creditable compensation for teachers for fiscal year 2011. The data are for employer contributions, which do not include contributions from state or local employees.

Total Employer Contributions to VRS for FY2013 and FY2014 will be $2.21 billion ($875.9 million GF).  Specifically, VRS will receive total employer contributions of $596.9 million ($270.3 million GF) for state employees and $1.61 billion (state and local) ($605.6 million GF) for teachers during this upcoming biennium.

Total Payback of Deferred Contributions to VRS for FY2013 and FY2014 will be $264.5 million ($104.7 million GF) million, which is included in the total employer contributions described above.  Specifically, VRS will receive payback of deferred contributions of $67.1 million ($30.4 million GF) for state employees and $197.4 million ($74.3 million GF) for teachers during this upcoming biennium.  As promised, this budget fully funds the first two installments of the 10-year payback of deferred contributions.

A comparison of prior investments in VRS is available below:

This proposed total employer contribution of $2.21 billion to VRS for FY2013 and FY2014 will be the largest total employer contribution to the Virginia Retirement System in history.

The $2.21 billion in employer contributions being recommended to VRS for FY2013 and FY2014 marks a significant additional commitment compared to FY2011 and FY2012 contribution total for state employees and teachers, which totaled $915.2 million. Specifically, for FY2011, total employer contributions to VRS totaled $74.1 million for state employees and $271.3 million for teachers. In FY2012, it is estimated that total contributions will be $108.5 million for state employees and $461.3 million for teachers.

Of the total employer contributions set forth above, localities as employers, will be making significant contributions toward VRS solvency for their teachers and local employees.

Previously, the next largest total employer contributions for state employees and teachers took place during FY2007 and FY2008, which totaled $1.72 billion compared to Governor McDonnell’s recommended $2.21 billion for FY2013 and FY2014.