Home Blog Page 3222

Tim Kaine on Bob Bennett Defeat, Tea Party, and the “Republican intra-party civil war”

9

DNC Chair (and former Virginia governor) Tim Kaine issued the following statement following the defeat of Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT) this weekend by Tea Party activists and others from the hard right who thought Bennett was not conservative enough.

Today the Tea Party strengthened its hold on the Republican Party by ousting Utah’s Senator Bob Bennett from the primary. That the Tea Party would consider Bob Bennett – one of the most conservative members of the U.S. Senate – too liberal, just goes to show how extreme the Tea Party is. This is just the latest battle in the corrosive Republican intra-party civil war that has resulted in the Tea Party devouring two Republicans in just as many weeks. If there was any question before, there should now be no doubt that the Republican leadership has handed the reigns to the Tea Party.

By the way, Progressive Punch rates Bennett as the 81st most progressive U.S. Senator, not much different than Jon Kyl (#78), Orrin Hatch (#79), Sam Brownback (#82), Michael Enzi (#84), Jim Inhofe (#86) and Jim DeMint (#87). The point is, if Bob Bennett isn’t conservative enough for the Tea Party, then basically noone in the GOP is.  In short, the Tea Party appears to be the monster that could cause the GOP to self destruct. As the saying goes, if you play with matches, you’re likely to get burned…

P.S. Spelling note to Tim Kaine; it should be “reins” not “reigns.”

UPDATE: See Chris Cillizza’s article on the “Bob Bennett fallout.”  According to Cillizza, Bennett’s loss “sets off alarm bells across the chamber as Members contemplate their own fates.” Cillizza adds that this is “especially true on the Republican side where the rise of the Tea Party movement has put establishment politicians on notice.” Cillizza quotes Republican strategist Ed Rogers pointing to Bennett’s loss as “proof that the tea party movement is huge presence in the GOP organization.” I agree with Cillizza and Rogers on all these points.

In My Heart, I’m There (with Former Marine Bacidore)

2

It hasn’t been that long since the so-called “Rev” Fred Phelps’s clan members gave Blacksburg an unwelcome visit.  Westboro visited town to tell us we “deserved” the horible events previously unleashed upon our town and to hurl cruel statements about the recently deceased VT student, Morgan Herrington, who was murdered in Charlottesville.  About 500 townspeople and students encircled Morgan Harrington’s father, who was present at the counter-demonstration, and greeted Phelps’s family members with messages of “stop hate” and other assorted greetings.

But the clan is also notorious for its protests outside of fallen soldiers’ funerals. Now a former marine isn’t going to take it anymore.  According to a Marine Corps Times article, now a former marine has taken up the cause of giving the so-called minister of hate Fred Phelps of Westboro “Baptist Church” a taste of his own medicine, albeit with much less hatred. He’s serving up a counter-protest of his own right where we all should–outside of Phelps’ so-called church.


Former Marine and Iraq veteran Jerry Bacidore, along with about 15 supporters, recently traveled nine hours from LaSalle, Ill., to attend a service at the Topeka, Kan., church and stage a silent protest.

The plan was to stand silently during the April 25 service, dressed in black, representing all fallen troops, Bacidore said. Prior to arriving, Bacidore said his group received approval to attend from Shirley Phelps-Roper, daughter of Westboro pastor Fred Phelps. But when they arrived, they found the church service time had been changed and that the service was no longer public.

As they did in Blacksburg, many town residents honked in agreement and waved on the counter-protesters.  Some even stopped and joined in.  Kudos to those who stood up. Despite reinforcement theory’s prescriptions, I do not think the correct action is to stay away or do nothing so as not to call attention to these people.  We need to stand up too, about that –and a lot more.  

Malek’s Firm Found Liable in $75 Million Fraud With Connecticut State Pension Funds

9

Prior to naming Fred Malek the chair of his new “Commission on Government Reform,” did Bob McDonnell look into the guy’s background at all?  So far, we have Malek’s work as Richard Nixon’s “Jew counter.” Needless to say, that alone should have disqualified Malek from being on this commission, let alone heading it. As if that’s not bad enough, there’s also the barbecued dog incident (sadly, this is not a joke).  But wait, there’s even more.

SEC administrative action

On August 12, 2003, the SEC filed a civil fraud lawsuit[18] against former Connecticut state Senate Majority Leader William DiBella for participating in a fraudulent scheme to invest $75 million of the state pension funds with Malek’s firm, Thayer Capital Partners.[18] [19] On May 18, 2007, DiBella and North Cove were found liable for aiding and abetting Silvester’s intentional violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Thayer was found in negligence of Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Thayer paid a civil penalty of $150,000, and Malek personally paid a fine of $100,000.[20]

That’s right, the guy Bob McDonnell picked to chair his new government “reform” commission, on top of his Jew counting and dog barbecuing, was forced to pay a $100,000 fine for participating, along with his firm Thayer Capital Partners, in a $75 million fraud against the Connecticut state pension fund (click here for SEC Litigation Release No. 20498).  And this is the guy Bob McDonnell wanted to figure out the best ways to “reform” Virginia government?  A guy who participated in defrauding the pension fund of another state? Great judgment there, Bob!

Jesus Christ! (Brought To You by Your Tax Dollars)

2

For those who miss the Dubya administration, Thomas Kidd of Baylor University is here to reimpose Texas values on us.  Kidd’s invasion from the Lone Star State comes in the form of an Op-Ed in today’s Washington Post, “McDonnell’s Jeffersonian decision on public prayer”.

The Texan writes in praise of McDonnell’s action allowing Virginia state police chaplains in public, state-sponsored ceremonies to invoke the name of Jesus Christ – in direct violation of a 2008 US Court of Appeals court order banning this practice.  And Kidd has the nerve to make his case in the name of our favorite son, Thomas Jefferson.  He writes:

The court’s ruling was an unwarranted intrusion into Americans’ religious freedom, and it certainly was not the kind of restriction that Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he drafted Virginia’s Statute for Establishing Religious Freedom (1786), or even when he wrote of a “wall of separation” between church and state. Jefferson and the other Founders meant to keep the government out of religion’s business, not to drive specific, “sectarian” religion out of the public sphere.

Since conservatives believe religiously in the “Original Intent” of the Founders, the fact that Jefferson didn’t mention police chaplains in the Statute “proves”, I guess, that this wasn’t what he had in mind.  While it is true, as Kidd writes, that Jefferson was trying to avoid having a state-funded and favored church, it is absurd to claim, as he does, that Jefferson thereby would have approved of all state-sponsored religious activity that falls short of such an establishment.  And Kidd provides no evidence whatsoever to back up this claim.

The fact is, though, that you don’t have to dig too far into the Virginia Statute for Establishing Religious Freedom in order to find language that could be used to argue vigorously against McDonnell’s decision.  In the preamble, the Statute talks of:

…the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavouring to impose them on others…

Sorry, but for a Jewish American like me, having my tax dollars pay for a state chaplain to ramble on about Jesus at a public ceremony is having someone else’s religion imposed on me – at my expense.  And, as Jefferson continues, “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.”  Amen, Brother TJ!

Kidd complains that avoiding sectarian religious references in public speech leads to a “kind of vacuous civil religion.”  Yes, but this misses the point that we have the entirety of our private lives to add the color to whatever religious paths we choose to follow.  The government is just an empty vessel to help establish a safe, healthy, open and free public space within which we have the opportunity to make a multitude of choices with others or on our own.  Why do we need the state taking sides and choosing theological winners and losers?  

The remarkable thing about the McDonnell/Cuccinelli Administration is how hard it is working to stick its nose in the places where government least belongs.  While General Cooch tries to impose his climate change conspiracy theories on our academic community, Governor Bob works to impose evangelical Christianity on the rest of us.  I can only respond by again quoting that great (not Texan but) Virginian:

Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. […] If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress, and Assemblies, Judges, and Governors, shall all become wolves.

Pay attention, Virginians, before these wolves gobble up any more of our freedoms.

Englin: Malek Appointment By McDonnell “deeply disturbing”

4

Del. David Englin (D-45) has some thoughts on Bob McDonnell’s appointment of Fred Malek (aka, “Sarah Palin’s leading defender”) to chair his new budget/government “reform” commission.

While I support the effort to create a top-level commission to recommend policies to reform government, it is deeply disturbing that Governor McDonnell would appoint as its chair Fred Malek, whose history in “reforming” government includes creating lists of Jews serving in government to track and remove from government service. Was there really no more qualified individual in Virginia to lead this panel? Has he done anything to disavow and make amends for his previous anti-Semitism? Otherwise, it’s one more slap in the face from McDonnell to Jewish state employees, coming right on the heels of allowing uniformed state police chaplains to proselytize to Jewish troopers and their families. These continued missteps from the McDonnell Administration are distractions from the competent and effective governing Virginians expect and deserve.

See NLS for more on this disturbing appointment.

UPDATE: Del. Adam Ebbin chimes in.

It is cause for profound concern that Governor McDonnell would appoint Fred Malek to head his Commission on Government Reform. Malek’s Nixon administration record of creating a list of Jews–with an eye towards removing them from public service–is still alarming today. There are certainly many capable Virginians who could assume this important position.

Mothers Day at the White House

0



Happy Mother’s Day!

Conservative Free-Lance Star: Cooch Setting Dangerous Precedent

6

Great editorial on Ken Cuccinelli, “campus cop” this morning in the conservative Free-Lance Star.  Here’s the conclusion, but definitely read the entire editorial, as it absolutely demolishes Cooch’s cuckoo reasoning on his witch hunt against free scientific inquiry.

…even if Mr. Cuccinelli thinks that academic scientists are “all in it together,” it is wrong-headed and dangerous for him to go slashing through the ivy. The total-war mentality of modern American politics abhors the existence of neutrals. In today’s vicious ideological battles there are few honest brokers and little affection for independent thinking. Yet the college campus must be a citadel of unmolested thought, a sanctuary from what George Orwell called the “smelly little orthodoxies” of politicians left and right. Because if it is not, its many imperfections will not yield what justifies them all–a drop, now and then, of unadulterated, liberating truth. Conservatives once knew that. True conservatives still do.

Mr. Cuccinelli, at least, is a lawyer, so he must appreciate the power of precedent. If he continues his charge into academe, it will not be without result. The result, however, probably won’t be what’s he seeking. It will be a trodden path for future A.G.s and others in authority to harass scholars whose research annoys them.

At the same University of Virginia whose records Mr. Cuccinelli is tossing are professors who are famously skeptical of global warming (Pat Michaels); others who hold that the decline of marriage is destroying U.S. society (Bradford Wilcox); still others who resist the entire liberal agenda (Gerard Alexander). They now have targets on their backs, too. And the whole academic enterprise, under direct political fire, may cower in its bunker, taking no chances-and shining no light.

Mr. Cuccinelli may be spoiling for a fight. But he should withdraw from this one, lest all Virginians rue the day he picked it.

How about “all Virginians rue the day they elected Ken Kookinelli as Attorney General?”

It Began in Peace

2

Tomorrow is Mother’s Day.  

This video only speaks of a woman who widened the celebration of mothers.  But before Julia Ward Howe, there was Anne Reeves Jarvis.  In 1858 Anne Reeves Jarvis of Culpepper Virginia founded Mother’s Day to honor her own mother.  But Jarvis was no traditional woman (not that there’s anything wrong with that–I honor, today and always, all women’s choices). But while Jarvis did found Mother’s Day to honor her own mother, she had the country and the larger world in mind. Jarvis was, sorry, Glenn Beck, a community organizer and social activist.  In what is now West Virginia, she created Mother’s Day Work Clubs to work toward clean water and the reduction of infant mortality.  

Perhaps you’ll be surprised that what is now West Virginia became the first state to celebrate Mother’s Day.  In 1868 Anne Reeves Jarvis created a post-Civil War reconciliation event called Mother’s Friendship Day for those who fought on both sides of the Civil War. She wanted to “reunite families that had been divided during the Civil War.” Grown men and women were said to have wept as those who had not spoken for years joined hands.  Family and friends who sometimes had been on opposite sides now had to find ways to move on.    

When Anne Jarvis died in 1905, her daughter carried on her effort.  Both women came to oppose the increasing commercialization of their movement. But it was for Julia Ward Howe to make Mother’s Day a more national celebration of what the real founder of mother’s day movement dreamed of.

1870 Julia Ward Howe founded Women’s Peace Day events . And in 1873 Howe’s conception of Mother’s Day took root.  Few today realize how women’s movement fore-mothers created this day with earnest hopes of peace.  I urge you to read Julia War Howe’s proclamation:


Mothers Day Proclamation – 1870

by Julia Ward Howe  

Arise then…women of this day!

Arise, all women who have hearts!

Whether your baptism be of water or of tears!

Say firmly:

“We will not have questions answered by irrelevant agencies,

Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage,

For caresses and applause.

Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn

All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience.

We, the women of one country,

Will be too tender of those of another country

To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs.”

From the voice of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with

Our own. It says: “Disarm! Disarm!

The sword of murder is not the balance of justice.”

Blood does not wipe our dishonor,

Nor violence indicate possession.

As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil

At the summons of war,

Let women now leave all that may be left of home

For a great and earnest day of counsel.

Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.

Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means

Whereby the great human family can live in peace…

Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar,

But of God –

In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask

That a general congress of women without limit of nationality,

May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient

And the earliest period consistent with its objects,

To promote the alliance of the different nationalities,

The amicable settlement of international questions,

The great and general interests of peace.

More information may be found at Julia’s Voice.

To the mothers out there, whether Democrat, Republican, Green, Independent, or Libertarian, in the spirit of our fore-mothers, I say: Happy Mother’s Day and …Peace.