Home Blog Page 2063

National Journal Article Explains Why Koch Brothers’ War on Clean Energy is Failing in the States

0

Cross posted from Scaling Green, because I think this is highly relevant to Virginia (where Bill “ALEC” Howell is Speaker of the House, and where Dominion and other fossil fuel interests have bought and paid for our state government)

As we know, the billionaire Koch brothers and their fossil fuel allies have been waging relentless war against clean energy for years now. Yet, as this fascinating article in National Journal explains, while the Koch-funded group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) has seen some successes at the national level in fighting clean energy, they are larging striking out in the states.  Why is this the case?  A few key points from the National Journal article answer that question.

  • …in statehouses nationwide-even those where Republicans are running the show-the GOP lacks the lockstep march on energy policy that is coming to define the national party. Certainly, a powerful faction working to undo the green-energy laws has swept through states over the past decade, but as in Kansas, their repeal efforts have repeatedly failed.”
  • “Over the past two years, at least 40 bills aimed at weakening or repealing clean-energy mandates have been introduced in legislatures across the country, according to Colorado State University’s Center for the New Energy Economy. But not a single state has done away with its renewable-energy standard. Ohio came the closest when the GOP-controlled Legislature voted to freeze a mandate in May; but everywhere else, repeal bills have either been voted down or have died without getting a vote.”
  • And Democrats are not to blame. Repeal is being thwarted by business-focused Republicans who are sticking up for the standards because they believe they create jobs. In Kansas and North Carolina, conservative lawmakers have voted against repeal-while Republicans in Minnesota and Nevada actually cast votes to strengthen clean-energy mandates last year.”
  • “Why hasn’t AFP had greater success in the states?…state legislators-by definition-are more local in their focus, and that puts them face-to-face with renewable-energy projects in their districts. In many parts of the country, red states included, wind and solar energy are already big business. They’re not ExxonMobil or Koch Industries big, but they have lobbying muscle and business interests of their own, and that’s enough to make state lawmakers think twice before going against them, even if that means standing against AFP.”
  • “Viewed as a slice of the nation’s economy, renewable energy’s share remains small…But in the state legislative districts where it’s produced, renewable energy is a big enough player to wield considerable clout.”
  • [AFP] isn’t throwing in the towel. The Koch empire, fresh from spending $100 million on the 2014 congressional midterm elections to help deliver the Senate into the hands of Republicans eager to unwind climate rules, is now pledging another run at the states’ renewable-energy standards.
  • “… despite more than two years of efforts led by AFP, both the mandates and the candidates who back them are safe. What worked in Washington has not worked in the states-even those in which AFP has had great success in other policy arenas.”

In sum, the National Journal article demonstrates that no matter how much money fossil fuel interests spend to attack clean energy, it’s difficult for them to win those battles due to wind and solar’s strong, bipartisan support across America.  Of course, that doesn’t mean the fossil fuel folks are going to give up, which means that cleantech must stay on top of this situation. Still, the bad news for the Koch brothers and their allies is that, with the clean energy industry growing by leaps and bounds, the political clout these industries wield will continue to grow as well. And the bottom line is that, even in “red states” like Kansas, politicians of all political stripes can clearly see which way the wind is blowing.

9 Ways the Fisette/Hynes Decision to Ditch the Streetcar Seriously Harmed Arlington

16

1. First and most obviously, this decision was wildly wrong on policy grounds, with the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in future tax revenues to Arlington County that would have been spurred by billions of dollars worth of streetcar-generated economic development. Those revenues could have been spent on “core services” like education and other important infrastructure, while helping to keep property tax rates among the lowest in the entire region. Now, that’s all gone, with nothing to replace it. Greeeeaaaat.

2. The decision essentially rewarded a campaign of lies and demagoguery waged by anti-streetcar forces. As this Greater Greater Washington commenter notes: “[Arlington County Board member and streetcar supporter Walter] Tejada’s anger is well placed. And its even more telling when [Arlington County Board Chair Jay Fisette] constantly (and rightly) responded to streetcar criticisms from prominent groups as misinformation. To give in basically admits that a constant stream of BS works. Unfortunately the streetcar isn’t the only example of this in our world but its one of the more blatant ones.”

3. The decision has seriously harmed relations among Board members. For starters, “The decision by Chairman Jay Fisette (D) and Vice Chairman Mary Hynes (D) to abandon the streetcar infuriated their longtime ally and fellow Democrat, J. Walter Tejada.” At the same time, “Three of the members” (that would be Tejada, Fisette and Hynes) “are accusing the two others” (John Vihstadt and Libby Garvey) “of spreading misinformation.” And they are correct, of course. The question is, how can a working relationship, based on any level of trust whatsoever, be rebuilt out of the rubble of this debacle? Got me.

4. The decision to ditch the streetcar left Columbia Pike businesses and residents who had made investments and other plans based on a rock-solid promise from Arlington County that the streetcar was coming are now left high and dry. As the Post article reports, “Inta Malis, an Arlington planning commissioner, said retailers on Columbia Pike have been operating at a loss, banking on future revenue that would come with a revitalized, streetcar-anchored corridor.” So now what happens? Does anyone have a plan, now that the methodical, painstaking 15-year planning process was just tossed to the curb by Jay Fisette and Mary Hynes? I strongly doubt it. And no, Vihstadt and Garvey were never serious about “BRT,” since that’s not possible on Columbia Pike.  

5. The summary manner in which the 15-year planning process for Columbia Pike and Crystal City’s futures was ditched makes an utter mockery of the “Arlington Way,” and of Arlington County’s reliability for local/regional/state partners pretty much for anything. To paraphrase what a super-smart local Democrat said recently in an email, this sudden, unilateral decision shocked and even angered supporters of the streetcar project, many of whom had worked hard on this for many years. Yet, with the abrupt announcement the other day by Arlington County Board Chair Jay Fisette, essentially decades of community planning were simply tossed aside. So much for Arlington’s supposedly progressive planning model? It sure feels like that’s now in ruins. Furthermore, after this fiasco, how can the public have any confidence whatsoever in Arlington’s planning process on anything else going forward?  I have no idea.

5a. Further elaborating on point #4, announcing the cancellation of such an important project, one that took so many years to develop, in a unilateral, surprise manner, with apparently no discussion or outreach, is simply not acceptable. Nor is it professional. Nor is it consistent with the “Arlington Way.”  Nor does it bode well for the future.

7. In a way, this decision and the way it was carried out represent the worst of all worlds. On the one hand, some of the strongest supporters not just of this project, but of the Democrats on the County Board, feel betrayed, blindsided, you name it. Personally, I’m seriously questioning whether I can support Jay Fisette or Mary Hynes going forward. So are others, such as this Arlington County Democratic Committee precinct captain, who writes that the “uproar and eventual cancellation of the streetcar have shaken my confidence that Arlington is the place that I thought it was.”  Me too.

7a. While the abrupt, strange, bordering-in-bizarre cancellation announcement angered supporters of the streetcar, if anyone thinks this will mollify streetcar opponents, they’re dreaming (or smoking something, or dreaming of smoking something – heh). To the contrary, my bet is that Vihstadt et al now sense weakness and even ineptitude, and will press forward to complete their takeover of the County Board. Which, of course, would seriously harm all of Arlington on a wide variety of issues. We saw an example of that recently, when Republican (whoops, almost forgot, he keeps calling himself an “Independent”) Vishtadt voted…yes, like a Republican, against heretofore noncontroversial incentives for developers to incorporate “LEED” energy/environmental standards into their buildings. I’d expect a lot more of this type of behavior in the future, particularly if the Vihstadt crowd gains even more seats on the County Board. Ugh.

9. All of this has harmed the Arlington County Democratic Committee (ACDC), which for many years has been – rightly or wrongly – closely tied in people’s minds to the Democratic leadership on the County Board. Keep in mind that, at least until recently, ACDC had been consider the gold standard among Democratic committees in Virginia, and even in the country. Now, it’s hard to say what the future will hold for ACDC. Among other things, dysfunction and division in ACDC could harm efforts to rack up huge margins in Arlington County for Democratic statewide candidates, in 2016 and beyond (are you reading this Robby Mook?). Let’s hope that doesn’t come to pass, but the reverberations of this fiasco have only begun to be felt, with a potentially nasty 2015 ahead of us in Arlington Democratic politics, and with important decisions to be made regarding how ACDC will move forward with previous members who supported John Vihstadt in 2013/2014. Good luck.

Virginia News Headlines: Friday Morning

2

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, November 28.

*Our giant welfare state (“When these are added to government’s direct payments, rankings shift. France remains at the top, but the United States vaults into second position with roughly 30 percent of its GDP spent on social services, including health care. We have a hybrid welfare state, partly run by the government and partly outsourced to private markets.”)

*Dehumanizing Ferguson (“By no means would I ever seek to excuse the arson, looting and senseless destruction that took place Monday night. But policing is something that should be done with a community, not to it. Officials were treating the people of Ferguson like a rabble long before the first police car was torched.”)

*New U.S. plan: ‘Leaner, meaner’ Iraqi force

*OPEC inaction sends Brent to four-year low, hits stocks (I think they’re trying, among other things, to damage Canadian tar sands, which require around $80-$85/barrel, and U.S. “tight oil,” which requires around $60-$65 per barrel, to break even.)

*Walmart Is Seeing Its Biggest Black Friday Protests Ever Today

*R-MC’s Trammell reflects on lessons of congressional campaign (“Start earlier. Raise more money. Be more aggressive” Well, since Trammell wasn’t in the slightest bit aggressive against Brat, that shouldn’t be hard.)

*Student action groups finding their voices at UVa

*Letter: Gas pipeline would sacrifice the needs of the many for the profit of the few

*Va. crime panel considers cigarette licensing

*Fairfax County police shot an unarmed man in his home and they won’t say why (They need to be much more forthcoming; why haven’t they been?!?)

*Ethics, baseball, taxes

*Dulles in trouble as traffic shifts to Reagan National (Silver Line to the rescue?)

*Arlington board tensions could hamper work after streetcar vote (“Fisette, Hynes and Tejada are openly frustrated with Garvey, whom they blame more than Vihstadt for spreading misinformation about the project.” I tend to agree, although I blame both of them.)

*A brisk shopping day today; weekend will take a turn for the warmer

Video: And Now for the Bad Dick Saslaw (D-ominion)

5

Here’s the thing with Virginia State Senate Minority Leader Dick Saslaw: when he opens his mouth and words come out, there’s a high probability that at least some of those words will be (take your pick) stupid, wrong, offensive, bizarre, crazy, etc. In this instance, Saslaw spoke for several minutes at Monday’s meeting of the Falls Church City Council, and he had a LOT to say. That includes his tirade against UVA, with which I largely agree (we’ll call that one the “good Dick Saslaw”). It also includes the snippet I’ve included here, in which Falls Church City Council Member Dan Sze asks Saslaw about “net metering” (“allows residential and commercial customers who generate their own electricity from solar power to feed electricity they do not use back into the grid”) As Sze correctly points out, “Virginia ranks near the bottom in the United States for mechanisms to allow renewable energy to work.”

So what’s Dick Saslaw planning to do about this unacceptable situation? Why, absolutely nothing of course. To put the answer to that question in context, really all you need to know is that Dominion Virginia Power is Dick Saslaw’s top all-time donor, at $240,508, and that Dominion Virginia Power is one of the worst, most backward and reactionary utilities in the country when it comes to renewable energy. Also keep in mind that Dominion essentially owns the Virginia General Assembly, having donated over $9 MILLION over the years to Virginia Democrats and Republicans alike (yes, that’s your power bill at work, helping a powerful, polluting corporation buy our “democracy”).

Anyway, back to Dick “Dominion’s Puppet” Saslaw and how he responded (or more accurately, failed to respond, other than pathetic whining about how life’s so unfaiiiiiiir – waaaaaaah!!!) to the excellent question from Falls Church City Council member Dan Sze on net metering. First, the bought-and-paid-for “Bad Dick Saslaw,” who I’d remind everyone is actually/unbelievably the Democratic leader in the Virginia State Senate, goes on a bizarre, Cuccinelli-style rant against the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan (CPP), in which he basically whines and spews out fossil fuel industry talking points. In fact, as this superb op-ed explains, with the CPP, we would reap “a $1.1 billion benefit to the Virginia economy before accounting for the economic benefits from the improved environment and health.” As an added bonus, the CPP “actually represents a significant business opportunity for Virginia to become a leading state in the areas of solar power, wind power, and energy efficiency.” More good news: “estimates are that energy efficiency alone could save Virginia households at least $517 million by 2020, and a lot more thereafter…allowing us to shut down antiquated, polluting power plants.” Last but not least, the CPP “will help protect our state against hundreds of billions of dollars – and untold lives – in potential climate devastation.”

Of course, Dominion puppet “Bad Dick Saslaw” ignores all this, along with Council Member Szu’s question (which, if you recall, was about net metering), while condescendingly asking, “you understand what I’m saying?” Council Member Szu’s response is priceless.

I understand completely, sir, but…the simple request is to allow municipalities like ours to be able to do net metering. It’s very simple. We want to work with Dominion to figure out how to [I believe he says “harness the resources of the sun”].

Good luck with that. As I wrote a few months ago, Dominion is one of the most “intransigent, obstinate, and unwilling” utilities in the country, one that apparently would rather die than adapt to a world in which renewable energy costs have plummeted, while the ability of consumers to partially or completely disconnect themselves from the power grid has soared (both trends are expected to continue and even accelerate in coming years). The bottom line is that Dominion is fighting a losing battle, and its bought-and-paid-for “allies” are doing it no favors by blocking and tackling for it. Instead, people like “Bad Dick Saslaw” should be using whatever influence they have on Dominion to persuade them to change course ASAP, for their own good and for the good of 8 million Virginians. The fact that “Bad Dick Saslaw” won’t do that is extremely revealing, and not in any good way.

Virginia News Headlines: Thanksgiving 2014

1

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Thanksgiving 2014.

*How to win Thanksgiving: Your guide to arguing with relatives (“It’s going to be especially hard to avoid politics at Thanksgiving this year. Here’s how you can defeat Uncle Dingo”)

*Here Is Everything That’s Wrong With Chuck Schumer’s Obamacare Comments (“Schumer’s notion that Obamacare only benefits those in the lower end of the economic spectrum is a flawed one. It is also in direct conflict with the Chuck Schumer of 2010, who campaigned incessantly for health care reform, and insisted that the policy ‘really did deliver for the middle-class.'”)

*GOP Mulls Not Inviting Obama to Give State of the Union (Yep, sounds like Republicans…petty and petulant as can be.)

*Darren Wilson And George Zimmerman Described Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin The Same Way (Hmmmmm…gee, wonder why that is.)

*Shadow Trial (“Prosecutors in Ferguson violated our right to an open criminal justice system.”)

*The Race to Be Hillary’s Karl Rove (“In a series of interviews with operatives inside and outside the Clinton orbit, most professional Democrats said the current favorite was Robby Mook, a well-traveled veteran at 35 who last served as the campaign manager for close Clinton friend Terry McAuliffe’s successful bid to become governor of Virginia in 2013.”)

*Warner, Kaine back DoD push to update protections in Military Lending Act

*For Rep. Dave Brat, a tricky balance (Yeah, he has to decide whether to focus on being crazy or extreme. Heh.)

*Va. Attorney General still paying off campaign debt (“Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring is still paying off campaign debt related to last year’s recount effort, while his political spending after nearly a year in office outpaces those of other possible 2017 gubernatorial candidates.”)

*University of Virginia Students Speak Out in Wake of Rape Allegations, Fraternity Closings

*Saslaw bill would make colleges report sexual assaults to police (Thanks for giving Blue Virginia credit for breaking this story. Next time, maybe you could actually link?)

*University Of Virginia Apologizes To Student Who Says She Was Gang-Raped

*Appalachian Power ordered to refund about $5.8 million to customers

*Proposal targets Virginia Beach’s TowneBank investments

*Loudoun will be home to mid-Atlantic’s first commercial hops facility

*RGIII’s rise and fall took less than three seasons

*From owner to coach to quarterback, the common theme in Washington is desperation

*A chilly Thanksgiving, with a slight chance of rain or snow

Video: Senate Minority Leader Saslaw Rips UVA’s “Crap” on Sexual Assault

3

As you might have noticed, I’m not a big fan of Virginia State Senate Minority Leader Dick Saslaw. However, in this case, I couldn’t agree more regarding UVA’s “crap.” Here’s a partial transcript of Saslaw’s comments at the Falls Church City council meeting Monday evening.

…I read that whole [Rolling Stone story on the UVA gang rape], I read it twice…and I’ve got to tell you, I can’t remember when I’ve been angrier as an adult reading that. It didn’t surprise me…because this has been going on forever. And I’ve got to tell you, I’ve been hearing this crap – and that’s what it is – from UVA over the last 40 years — let us handle it, we know how to do it, don’t…require us to report this, the women won’t come in…the reason these kids don’t come forward is they know the university’s total dedication is to sweeping everything under the rug…One kid had raped two women. They never called the police; they suspended him for a year and let him back on campus.

I’ve got a bill that’s currently being drafted. And what that’s going to say is that if a university or higher education state employee is informed that a sexual assault has taken place, they’re going to have 24 hours to report it to the local police, and if they don’t they’re going to face up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. Let me tell you, this has got to stop. The other thing is, those people at UVA have no business of adjudicating a felony for god’s sake…Had that same kid been off campus and not a student at UVA, he’d be pulling 40 years in prison in Virginia, not walking across the stage with a diploma…

What parent in their right mind would send a daughter to UVA when she’s got…a 20 percent chance, a 20 percent chance of being sexually assaulted? That’s how bad it is…They’ve been doing it their way and it doesn’t work…And they’ve essentially told every male, particularly those on fraternity row, it always has been and still is open season on females. They don’t have any fear of being turned into the police, and that’s going to stop…

The reason they don’t come forward is because they know the university is going to try to talk them out of it. They’re telling these kids, your parents worked hard to get you here, do you want to blow all of this up? So, yeah, we’re going to do something, and we’re not waiting for commissions, study groups, or anything like that.

Rolling Stone Names Dan Snyder THE Worst Owner in Sports

1



A richly deserved “honor” by Rolling Stone for Dan Snyder and for “every contemptuous, miserly, greed-headed, soul-dead move Snyder has pulled in D.C,” not to mention his “blithe unconcern with a shredded field and player health that already nearly Cuisinarted RG III’s knee” and the “cluster**** of tire fires the R**kins have become under Snyder’s tenure, all set ablaze by the flaming sack of dogs*** that is what passes for his conscience.”

Yeah, I’d say that mostly covers it. This being a Virginia political blog, I’d just remind everyone that Snyder donated $50,000 to Bob McDonnell in 2009, and that he’s undoubtedly figuring out a way to milk Virginian taxpayers out of a whole bunch more corporate welfare for his “professional football team” (using that phrase very loosely). Don’t let him.

10th Senate District of Virginia

0

State Senator John Watkins has announced his retirement from the Virginia state senate and already hopes from Democrats are that they can pick up this seat, achieve a 20-20 tie, if they don’t lose any other seats, then take control with Northam as the tie braking vote.  Wow, they even brought the red ribbon and tied this package up in a bow.  But taking a close look at this seat, it’s clear the GOP has the edge.  And frankly, if Del. Manoli Loupassi, R-VA is the GOP nominee, he will be difficult to beat.  

Chesterfield County accounts for 49% of this district, the City of Richmond 37%, and Powhatan County, home to too many Tea Partiers per square foot, 14%.  

Throw out all of the election results except the AG race in 2013 and the Senate race in 2014 and use that as a guide.  Herring barely won the district, 51% to 49% in 2013; Warner did slightly better, winning the district 49.7% to 46.6%.  Clearly Warner did about a point better than Herring did, which is not too surprising, since Warner was still able to carry some GOP voters and Independents who lien to the GOP, in the Richmond suburbs. So, clearly on a statewide race for governor, senator or president, the Democratic nominee can clearly carry this district.  That’s the good news.  

But get into a local race and our voters are like bears hibernating in the winter – no where to be seen.  Adding insult to injury, many of the precincts in this district in Chesterfield County are the most Republican in the county and they turn out in bigger numbers in these types of elections than our Democratic brethren.  Ditto in Powhatan County, where the margins in the precincts in Powhatan are even bigger than Chesterfield for Republicans.  

This state senate district has to be considered as a lien Republican district.  Even if a Dem wins the City of Richmond and it goes 2-1 for the Democrat, you still face big margins running up against the GOP vote totals in Chesterfield and Powhatan.      

But this is where the power of a Manoli Loupassi candidacy can turn the tide for the GOP.

Loupassi is a former member of the Richmond City Council, a former Vice Mayor of Richmond and President of Richmond City Council.  Manoli served as Chairman of the Richmond Public Safety Commission for 4 years and was a multi-district state prosecutor in the Metropolitan Richmond Area including Hanover County, Henrico County, Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond.

Loupassi has deep roots in Richmond and was quite popular and in a match up with a Democratic candidate, Loupassi could easily win 40% of the vote in Richmond, and combined with his haul in Chesterfield and Powhatan, could easily win this seat with 55% of the vote or more.

The big elephant in the room for Dems is turnout – how do you get Democratic voters to turn out in an election like this.  Whoever is the nominee is going to have to build an incredible organization and have assistance from everyone – state elected officials, local Democratic committees and other left leaning organizations.  Even Dwight Jones is going to have to get off his ass and do something – I guess ANYTHING is possible.

So, who should the nominee be?  Who can eke out a win in this district?  I don’t have a clue.  

I know Baliles is on city council, sitting in Loupassi’s old seat in Richmond, but does Baliles have the campaign organization, and ability to raise the money he needs to run a good race?  Is he a good campaigner?  Where is he on the ideological spectrum?  Do you run a very progressive campaign to turn out your supporters in BIG numbers in Richmond and in some precincts in Chesterfield, as well as locating your supporters and turn them out in more GOP leaning precincts throughout the district?  

Or, do you go with Decker in Chesterfield, where 49% of the voters live in hopes that his successful run as a Chesterfield County Supervisor will pay dividends at the ballot box?  Can Gecker get a big vote in Richmond and reduce the GOP margin in Chesterfield that he can eke out a win?  Or by nominating Gecker with not ties to Richmond, do we lose the ability to tun out big numbers in Richmond?    

Everyone has to understand that this seat is going to be an uphill climb to win because we have voters who fail to turn out in elections like this.  Hard choices are going to have to be made about who should be the nominee and what type of race should be run.  And everyone has to buy into the strategy once the nominee is picked.  No whining, no complaining – just get the job done.  Control of the senate is at stake here and it’s going to be a tough one to win.

One other thing – everyone needs to look at these numbers when Watkins won re-election in 2011 against a Democratic candidate.  The Dem won Richmond, taking 67% of the vote, more than 2 to 1 and he still lost the district by 5,000 votes.  The Dem was crushed in Powhatan 78% to 22%, not quite 4 to 1, and in Chesterfield the Dem lost 63% to 37%, just shy of 2 to 1.  

The massive turnout in Powhatan was impressive for Watkins.  In a senate district where Powhatan is 14% of the district, Powhatan cast 7,207, or almost 24% of all votes cast.  That is a huge problems for Dems and they have to have a strategy district wide to deal with it.  

Some might say that these voters turned out for Watkins for a lot of different reasons, and that another Republican can’t duplicate what Watkins did but I don’t believe that.  The GOP will pull Dave Brat into Powhatan and Chesterfield and rally all the nut cases there to keep the senate in GOP control so Dems better get their act together quickly.    

So saddle up everyone.

https://voterinfo.sbe.virginia…

         

Virginia News Headlines: Wednesday Morning

3

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Wednesday, November 26.

*‘Better night’ in Ferguson though dozens arrested

*Inconsistency only constant with case

*Officer Darren Wilson’s story is unbelievable. Literally.

*Congress Poised To Eliminate Key Tax Breaks For Middle Class, Provide Permanent Tax Breaks For Corporations (Sounds like veto material to me.)

*Obama Threatens to Veto $440 Billion Tax Deal (“The president would veto the proposed deal because it would provide permanent tax breaks to help well-connected corporations while neglecting working families.” Bingo. Also, so much for Republicans caring about the debt!)

*How sexual abusers hide in plain sight: What Rolling Stone’s blockbuster UVA rape exposé really tells us (“…we clearly haven’t learned enough to consider rape enough of a crime to, you know, matter, especially when the big business of media and higher education is at stake.”)

*Jindal to keynote Va. GOP’s Advance (How appropriate! LOL)

*Powhatan senator Watkins won’t run again in 2015 (“His departure could create an opening in the 2015 legislative elections for Democrats, who in the past three statewide elections have carried his district, which includes parts of Chesterfield and Powhatan counties and the city of Richmond.”)

*Fresh from narrow re-election win, Warner sets sights on U.S. debt

*Speculation builds ahead of McAuliffe’s visit to N.H. (“The Virginia governor will address a state Democratic Party meeting and headline a fundraiser next month.”)

*Attorney General Herring appoints counsel for UVa board on sexual assault policies

*Letter: College students support federal carbon reduction standard for Virginia

*Nov. 26 Letters: Sen. Kaine on Keystone XL Pipeline (“…we need to send the market signal that cleaner energy is the path forward. We need to be cleaner tomorrow than today.”)

*U-Va.’s governing board votes for zero tolerance of sexual assault

*The UVA Gang Rape Allegations Are Awful, Horrifying, and Not Shocking at All

*Fairfax County facing budget shortfall, officials say

*Hampton Roads reacts to Ferguson unrest

*Editorial: Hanover Schools – Eeek (“Never let it be said that residents of Hanover are not vigilant. Some of them stand ready to clutch their pearls and swoon at the first sight of peril – real or imagined.”)

*Poorly timed rain and snowfall complicates Thanksgiving travel

One Thing I Know about Ferguson

19

I don’t know enough about the facts of what happened that night in Ferguson to know with any certainty whether an indictment was called for or not. I’ve not explored the witness statements, and don’t know who or what to believe about what happened between Darrell Wilson and Mike Brown.

But I do know that the authorities handled the legal process about it it quite wrongly.

Their priority should have been to conduct the process in such a way as to maximize the chance that everyone would have confidence in its integrity and fairness. They didn’t even try.



That should have been their priority because taking care not to damage the larger society by exacerbating a major fault line is what has been most important all along.

Every effort should have been made to protect the society from further divisive wounding. The over-riding question for the county prosecutor, and for the Missouri governor, should have been: How can this be dealt with so that everyone feels assured that every good faith effort has been made to see that justice is done, whatever that may entail?

That would have meant bringing in a special prosecutor, of unquestioned integrity, in charge of the investigation and the grand jury process.

Even if the county prosecutor was indeed going to be fair, from the outset, he was not seen that way by the side most aggrieved. Leaving him in charge, pre-determined that, rightly or wrongly, a non-indictment would be seen as a failure of justice, and would unleash the pain and rage that we have seen.

Then this prosecutor — with a personal history and set of allegiances that already seemed to stack the deck — proceeded to conduct the grand jury process in a very unorthodox way, not seeking an indictment as prosecutors generally do, but leaving to the grand jury what prosecutors generally do. This alteration of the usual process clearly served the interest of the accused.

And finally there were the leaks, all of which served the interests of the officer who shot Mike Brown.

All in all, the prosecutor and the Missouri governor failed to do what was required. They proceeded in a way that placed dynamite along a sensitive fault line, and now that community, that state, and our nation are unnecessarily wounded.

It didn’t have to be this way, indictment or no. Not if proper care had been taken.

We don’t need to know anything about the shooting to know that the officials in charge here failed to serve the public interest.