Home Blog Page 2351

WVU Expert on Coal Mining’s Impact on Appalachia Calls Ken Cuccinelli’s Assertions “Pretty Sad”

3

We all know that Ken Cuccinelli is a climate science denier, persecutor of climate scientists, clean energy basher, and major recipient of fossil fuel industry largesse. So I wasn’t surprised when I saw this headline in the Fredericksburg Patch, quoting Cuccinelli that “The war on coal in Virginia is a war on the poor” and that the coal industry is supposedly “vital to the [Appalachian Power Company service] area’s economic stability.

In fact, as we’ve discussed previously, the whole “war on coal” argument is utter bull****. In fact, Virginia coal mining employment is UP – repeat, UP! – under President Obama. That’s not a LOT of jobs (0.46% of the Virginia total), but still, it’s nice to get the facts straight once in a while – even if you’re a right-wing ideologue (aka, “liar”) like Ken Cuccinelli. In addition, as this post explained, there’s been a decades-long decline of coal mining employment in Central Appalachia, a large chunk of which occurred under Presidents Reagan and George HW Bush (the trend continued under Bill Clinton, then reversed a bit under George W. Bush and Barack Obama).

The reasons for this decline?  First, mechanization (e.g., mountaintop removal coal mining), which has made the coal industry far more capital intensive and far less labor intensive than it used to be. Second, a migration of coal mining from places (e.g., Virginia) where it used to be mined by humans, operating in coal mines, to highly-mechanized Western and/or mountaintop removal operations. And third, the move away from coal and towards cheap and abundant natural gas, as well as much cheaper (and inexhaustible) wind and solar power. Put that all together, and what do you get? A decline in coal mining employment in the U.S. over many, many decades. Nothing to do with a “war,” unless you consider the impersonal forces of capitalism, technology and economics to be conscious beings capable of initiating hostilities against coal miners. (rolls eyes)

Anyway, I was curious what an actual, you know, EXPERT in this subject thought, as opposed to a bought-and-paid-for “useful idiot” like Ken Cuccinelli. So, I contacted Professor Michael Hendryx of West Virginia University, who has done a great deal of work on the health and economic impacts of coal mining in Appalachia (e.g., “Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal” and “The association between mountaintop mining and birth defects among live births in central Appalachia, 1996-2003.”). The first paper, for instance, found that “the life cycle of coal-extraction, transport, processing, and combustion-generates a waste stream and carries multiple hazards for health and the environment,” adding up to massive externalities that are “costing the U.S. public a third to over one-half of a trillion dollars annually” and that, “[a]ccounting for the damages conservatively doubles to triples the price of electricity from coal per kWh generated.”

Anyway, I wanted to see what Professor Hendryx thought specifically about Ken Cuccinelli’s comments that “The war on coal in Virginia is a war on the poor.” His response was very revealing:

The evidence is overwhelming that a coal-dependent mining economy perpetuates poverty and offers increasingly fewer economic opportunities, but the industry and the politicians that cater to it can still play the jobs card it seems. Pretty sad.

In other words, Cuccinelli has it completely backwards: far from his (non-existent) “war on coal” constituting a (non-existent) “war on the poor,” in fact “a coal-dependent mining economy perpetuates poverty and offers increasingly fewer economic opportunities.” So much for that “Big Lie” by Ken Cuccinelli.

By the way, in the same talk, Cuccinelli also attacked Terry McAuliffe for supporting a “Renewable Portfolio Standard of 25% renewable sources of electricity by 2025” which Cuccinelli says is “bordering on California-style energy policy.” Of course, in Cuccinelli’s warped worldview, that’s a bad thing. In stark contrast, in the world of sanity and fact, that’s actually a very good thing.

Recently, the American Council on Renewable Energy’s (ACORE’s) “Fact Check” utterly demolished the claim that “State Renewable Portfolio Standards are job-killing government mandates that offer no economic benefits and cause skyrocketing electricity rates.” In fact, according to ACORE, “RPS policies are currently driving over 1/3 of new renewable energy development across America in a cost-competitive manner that protects American consumers.” Across the country, ACORE explains, Renewable Portfolio Standards are working to “drive in-state economic growth” while dramatically boosting the amount of renewable energy on the grid.

For instance, in deep “red” Texas, the state’s RPS “has been so successful that its 10-year goal was met in just over six years.” In our neighbor to the south, “renewable energy has decreased electricity rates and rates are lower than they would be without renewable energy, according to a 2013 study conducted by RTI International.” And in California, which Cuccinelli singles out as some sort of bogeyman, “[e]lectricity costs are dropping…making renewable energy more competitive with fossil fuels.”

The bottom line is that Ken Cuccinelli either a) has absolutely no idea what he’s talking about when it comes to energy issues; b) is simply spouting the false, “Big Lie”-style propaganda of his big fossil fuel donors and pals; or c) knows exactly what the facts are but has decided to lie through his teeth anyway (to pander for votes, to please his corporate masters, etc.). Actually, come to think of it, it’s probably “a,” “b” and “c” – the triple whammy of lies, disinformation, and ignorance all rolled into one noxious package. What a nightmare.

Video: Ken Cuccinelli’s and Mark Obenshain’s “Personhood” History

0

All you really need to know is that these two guys have been RABID in their support of legislation to ban abortion and most forms of contraception. Now that they’re running for Governor and Attorney General of Virginia, they’re pretending none of that ever happened (“Etch-a-Sketch!”). Don’t let Cuccinelli and Obenshain get away with their Big Lie.

The Spirit that Drove Us to Civil War is Back: The Spirit of the Slave Power Since Slavery

1

( – promoted by lowkell)

This is the fifth entry in the series*

Patterns tend to persist in cultures over long periods.

Sometimes, when a spirit has seized hold of a society and then driven it into disaster or disgrace, that spirit can be eradicated, or at least exiled into the recesses of the culture. Think of the way that Nazism has been systematically driven out of the German nation and the German psyche.

Nothing remotely like this happened with the spirit that took possession of the South and led it into catastrophic defeat in the Civil War.  

If it was an evil spirit that inflamed a region to fight to preserve slavery, neither the South nor the nation as a whole ever decided to drive that spirit out.

The South has continued to honor that spirit, and its fateful consequences. My wife went to Nathan Bedford Forrest High School. Forrest was a main founder of the Ku Klux Klan. The other high school nearby was named for Jefferson Davis, who attempted to prolong the war after Robert E. Lee had surrendered to Ulysses Grant. The South continues to form its identity around the spirit that animated it during that era of destruction.

After the Civil War, the same spirit that had roused the South to fight to preserve its “peculiar institution” – to defend both its existence and Southern claims about its rightness — continued to dictate the region’s values, claiming that the “Lost Cause” was noble and that its defenders were the good guys.

After the war and Reconstruction, that spirit created the Jim Crow South. It was a regime that wielded power through racial terror and oppression, forming the heart of the region’s politics and power relations for the better part of a century.  Although slavery had been abolished, its basic dynamics were resurrected, with blacks exploited and kept in humiliating and degrading conditions.  

The spirit that created Jim Crow also exploited the brokenness of its devotees, socializing a great many people from the dominant race to be ready to punish the most vulnerable group of people in their midst if any of them stepped out of line.  It built into the culture a readiness to punish a black man for looking the wrong way at a white woman, or for failing to show sufficient deference to whites, or for objecting to second-class citizenship (e.g. wanting the right to vote).  

The regime ended when the nation as a whole rallied — nearly a century after the Civil War — to enforce equal protection under the law.  Segregation was dismantled.

But that spirit is back.

Since the end of segregation, the once solidly Democratic South has become the base of a Republican Party that preys on the most vulnerable and expresses contempt (behind closed doors) for the “47 %”( of whom it has a most distorted picture). It hosts a political culture that is more likely to blame and belittle the downtrodden than to want to help them. It’s a culture that would rather children go hungry than that the richest should pay a cent more.

This Republican culture, moreover, seeks to impose its dominance in the name of morality, while really being driven by an insistence on power and control.  And like the earlier ante-bellum expression of this spirit, today’s version presents itself as the bastion of Christian values.

In these ways, the spirit expressing itself through today’s Republican Party resembles what worked for decades to defend human slavery as right and good and just. It is a spirit that drives people into dominating and exploiting others, and covering it over with hypocrisy.

***********************

The first four entries have been

The Spirit that Drove Us to Civil War is Back: Introduction,

The Spirit that Drove Us to Civil War is Back: The Wolves’ Version of Liberty ,

The Spirit That Drove Us to Civil War Is Back: Looking Closer at that National Nightmare, and

The Spirit That Drove Us to Civil War Is Back: A Spirit that Made Slavery Its Priority.

The next four entries will deal with the issue of where the responsibility lies, in both the Civil War era and the present day, for the breakdown of the political process into ever less cooperation and ever-escalating levels of conflict. These pieces, about the spirit that prefers war to peace,will appear beginning in two weeks.

*****************

Andy Schmookler, recently the Democratic nominee for Congress from Virginia’s 6th District, is an award-winning author, political commentator, radio talk-show host, and teacher.  His books include The Parable of the Tribes:  The Problem of Power in Social Evolution.   His website is at www.NoneSoBlind.org .  An archive of some of his earlier Blue Virginia postings can be found at  

https://bluevirginia.us/use…  .

EXCLUSIVE Blue Virginia Interview with Terry McAuliffe: Part II

8

Intro: Recently, the McAuliffe for Governor campaign graciously provided Blue Virginia editors lowkell and kindler the opportunity to interview Terry for 45 minutes at his campaign HQ in Arlington. The following interview is edited for length and to focus on highlights of our conversation. We posted the first part of the interview yesterday; this is the second and final installment. Cross-posted at Daily Kos.

“Education…is an investment, not an expense”

lowkell: Ken Cuccinelli likes to say he’s “Frugal Ken” and you’re supposedly “Union Terry.”  Two part question: First, I’m wondering what you think of Cuccinelli’s claim to be “frugal,” especially given his waste of money pursuing climate scientists and all this frivolous litigation he’s mostly lost — and his plan is to have these huge tax cuts for the wealthy and for corporations, which would blow a massive hole in Virginia’s budget.

Terry: Well, “Frugal Ken” is a cute little slogan.  But this election is not about cute slogans — we’ve got big issues facing us, many of which we’ve already discussed. It’s not frugal if you’re going to go before people and say I’m going to give you a $1.4 billion tax cut per year. I would love to run for governor and promise you billions of dollars in tax cuts. But I won’t do that, because I’m realistic and honest. That is fiscally irresponsible.

I thought the debate was pretty clear — he was asked how he was going to pay for it and he could not answer. Which tax incentives are you going to eliminate? He could not give one. So it’s slogans. I’m not going to do that. As you know, Vince Callahan, who was the longest-serving Republican House of Delegates member, former chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, came out and said this would blow a gigantic hole in the budget. It would wreak havoc at the local level.

And at the end of the day, it would most likely just take money out of education and public health. At a time we need to be investing in education — which is an investment, not an expense — you’re going to be taking this money out of education, not saying how you’re going to pay for it? What people want in their governor is an honest approach, bipartisan, fiscally responsible, like you had with Warner and Kaine, protecting our AAA bond rating while investing in education.

“I’m tired of the demonizing, the dividing of folks…when I’m governor, I’m going to work with everybody”

lowkell: As for the “Union Terry” label, I’m wondering what your views are on the best ways to stand up for working people, in contrast to Cuccinelli’s union-bashing.

Terry: I get support from union members, and to be very honest with you, I’m proud to have their support. And I’ve said this over and over: I’m tired of the demonizing, the dividing of folks. This constant diving of people — it’s not helpful, it’s not constructive, it’s not how I’ve led my life, and I get tired of hearing it. I get tired of hearing my opponent attack teachers. All I can tell you is when you divide people, you hurt Virginia.

Let me tell you, when I’m governor, I’m going to work with everybody. I’m going to work with business, I’m going to work with labor, I’m going to bring people together, I’m going to do what’ll lead to the most efficient, productive government that helps Virginians. People know that I’m very accessible, that I love to work, I love to go round the clock, I’m not a big sleeper, I don’t believe in it. This will be an exciting governorship.

“He says that the jobs created by the Federal government are not good jobs. Well you tell that to everybody in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads”

kindler: The Obama campaign proved that Democrats can win Virginia if we get young people and minority communities out to vote. And the Deeds campaign showed what happens when we don’t — losing by 17 points to Bob McDonnell. Speaking directly to these communities, what is your message to them?

Terry: Great question and I think that encapsulates everything I talk about. First of all, if you’re a young person, what are you worried about? You’re getting out of college, a lot of debt, you want a job first and foremost. So the big things I talk about, diversifying this economy, getting all these new sort of industries — cyber, nano, bio — all these new things I get excited about — big data, analytics, all that great stuff, that’s what we have to focus on. So I’m telling young people, I want you to stay in Virginia. It’s the same thing I say to my five children: stay here. We’ve got to have those jobs of the 21st century.  

So if I’m a young person out there today, I’ve got to make the decision. Who’s going to make Virginia the place where I’m going to get the job that I want? I get concerned about young people getting out of college today in debt and taking jobs that they don’t want to take but have to. I tell young people, I’ve tried so many different things in my life, taken a lot of risks, a lot of chances, I enjoy doing it.  And you learn by all those great experiences. I want to make sure people can make decisions for their quality of life, that they’re doing the things they want to do.  

I want to make sure that young people have those exciting choices available for their future, but also a great place to live.  But not with this anti-women’s health, anti-gay, anti-immigrant stuff. So if I’m a young person out there, I’d be saying, let me get this straight: one guy’s all for the transportation approaches to ease our congestion, for the Medicaid expansion that would create tremendous economic opportunities, freeing up hundreds of millions of dollars in the general fund budget by taking this money we’re spending today that we don’t have to and focusing it on education? I think this guy’s really going to work his tail off to diversify this economy, and do what he has to do to bring businesses here. That’s why I’m running and I think it’s a clear choice in this election.

My opponent continually attacks the Federal government.  I’ll remind you that 50% of the economic activity in Hampton Roads and a third of our economic activity in Northern Virginia is directly related to the Federal government.  He says that the jobs created by the Federal government are not good jobs. Well you tell that to everybody in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads. I want to work with the Federal government. Now if we have an issue where there’s something coming out that would affect Virginia adversely, of course I’m going to fight that.  But most importantly, you want me working with the Feds to get to the next level.  

As for minority communities: very important for turnout. As I said in the debate, one of my proudest moments as governor will be when I can stand with Alfonso Lopez signing the Dream Act.  We got it further than it’s ever gone before, and while I hope the Federal government gets immigration done, we need to do our part here in Virginia. Also, a tremendous issue for the African-American community, when I visit with them as I just did in Richmond, is the quality of education, especially pre-k, early childhood education. That’s what they tell me they’re worried about.

“I’d put together an independent ethics commission: people who are being investigated should not investigate themselves”

kindler:The State Integrity Project ranks Virginia 47th among the 50 states in its state corruption index. Our system seems outdated from the lack of campaign finance laws and gift bans to many other issues. Will you be a reform governor, and what would you do to reform the state?

Terry: There are a lot of things I’d love to reform.  The first thing I’d propose, on day one, is a $100 gift ban. We will take no gifts over $100. The same guy who’s been giving gifts to the governor has done it to Ken Cuccinelli — it’s the New York trips, it’s the Smith Mountain Lake, the many times in his Richmond home, it’s the $1500 Thanksgiving dinner, it’s also buying stock in his company and not disclosing it, and then, as the New York Times reported last week, selling the stock after he spent a weekend with him.  

Let’s get rid of that — so I’m very clear: when I’m governor, nobody can give me anything over $100. I’d make it zero but you’ve got to get some commemorative items, keys to cities and things like that.  And for my whole family — this idea that I’m not giving it to the governor, but they’re giving it to my daughter — sorry, I don’t buy it.  

I’d also put together an independent ethics commission: people who are being investigated should not investigate themselves. I’ve laid it out on my website how they all get picked.  

Another big thing I’d like to get done — I don’t like this partisan redistricting. I would love if I could get something done with real teeth — it won’t be until I leave, obviously, it would be the next governor — but if we could get something done where we have non-partisan re-districting, that would be the most important thing we could do, because I really do believe that this has been a core problem with democracy.

“There are no silo campaigns this time around, we’re all working with each other”

lowkell: What do you see as the prospects for increasing the share of Democrats in the General Assembly?

Terry: Well, we’ve got a great campaign running, we’ve got a lot of folks on the ground, and we’ve been very active in the House of Delegates financially, more than any other candidate — we are all in.  We’ve made a very substantial financial commitment to them, we’ve told the House of Delegates members they can use our offices, we’re sharing data. Mark Herring, Ralph Northam and I are appearing together every week, running as a true ticket. There are no silo campaigns this time around, we’re all working with each other. So I think we can pick up some seats in the House of Delegates, and I tell folks, we need to look at this as the beginning of a ten year plan of what we need to do.

They’ve done a very good job of recruiting, we’ve got a lot of candidates on the field, so it’s all about turnout, which is what we work very hard at, but the [district] lines are the lines at the end of the day.

People are fired up — last week we were in Sterling and Loudoun for our office opening — more couldn’t get in, there were so many people there. People are fired up this year.

Virginia News Headlines: Tuesday Morning

3

Here are a few Virginia (and national) news headlines, political and otherwise, for Tuesday, July 30. And yes, I despise bottled water…environmental disaster and total boondoggle.

*Pope Francis On Gay Priests: ‘Who Am I To Judge?’ (I’m liking this Pope more and more, even as Ken Cuccinelli’s probably liking him less and less. LOL)

*Fox News’s worst interview yet (“The network owes author Reza Aslan an apology.” And the person doing the interview should never work on TV again, and the network should pledge to never conduct ANY interview like this again, etc. But none of that will happen, most likely, because this is the egregious Faux “News” we’re talking about.)

*Gerson: The GOP’s offensive, clueless minority (Wait, I thought it was the majority?)

*Kaine wants more effort to speed transfer from Guantanamo

*Kaine to chair key Middle East panel

*Mitt Romney’s Incredible 47-Percent Denial: “Actually, I Didn’t Say That” (He’s always been a pathological liar, why stop now? Actually, in all seriousness, Willard needs to get psychological help. He’s delusional.)

*Campaign chest or slush fund? (“Under Virginia’s flimsy finance laws, the first lady’s use of McDonnell  campaign funds is legal.”)

*Debate discord surfaces in LG race (“Democratic nominee Ralph Northam raised the issue Monday morning when he challenged Republican nominee E.W. Jackson to accept three debate invitations: an AARP-sponsored formum at Virginia Tech, another in Richmond and a third at Northern Virginia’s George Mason University.”)

*Conservative film flays McAuliffe’s Va. biz deals (Citizens United “was a litigant in a case that produced a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision giving corporations, labor unions and other organizations greater freedom to spend on political causes.” That’s right, one of the worst Supreme Court decisions ever…and this is the group that started it. Blech.)

*Ad targets Cuccinelli fight with climate scientist

*McDonnell’s private lawyers bill the state $54,000 in embezzlement case (“About $24,000 was for McDonnell himself, and the rest was to help his staff respond to FOIA request”)

*Who knows Virginia? Not (fill in the blank) … (“McAuliffe actually said he wanted to ‘four-lane 58 all the way out from the port.'” Uhhhh…last I checked “all the way out” means from beginning to end. But not in Ken Kookinelli’s weird world, apparently.)

*Today’s top opinion: Elegy (“The supposition that Virginia’s tradition of gentlemanly government means that the commonwealth does not require remedies for greed appropriate for, say, Louisiana invites derision. It does not set a high bar to say Virginia is not as bad as the worst.”)

*Expectations  for intermodal (“A study of the freight train terminal can keep the project percolating”)

*Broken promises on Craney Island

*Grass-roots campaign rallies opponents of Bi-County Parkway

*Dog days of summer will be all wag and no bite for at least another day

McDonnell’s lawyers bill state $54,000 for first five weeks of work

2

http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

RICHMOND – The private law firm hired to represent Gov. Robert F. McDonnell and his staff in the embezzlement case against the former chef at the governor’s mansion has billed Virginia nearly $54,000 for its first five weeks of work, according to documents released Monday.

About $24,000 of the bill was for legal work performed on behalf of McDonnell (R), said Tony Troy, the firm’s lead attorney on the matter. The remainder was for representation provided to McDonnell’s staff and for handling Freedom of Information requests related to the case, Troy said.

Hmmm.  $54,000 for the first five weeks of work comes out to almost $11,000 a week.  If Governor Rolex is hit with federal charges look for the lawyers’ bill to go straight up.  Did he put a line item in the budget for this?

To the South: North Carolinians Face a Bleaker Environmental Future.

0

Behold Article Fourteen, Section Five of the North Carolina state constitution.

Sec. 5. Conservation of natural resources.

It shall be the policy of this State to conserve and protect its lands and waters for the benefit

of all its citizenry, and to this end it shall be a proper function of the State of North Carolina

and its political subdivisions to acquire and preserve park, recreational, and scenic areas, to control and limit the pollution of our air and water, to control excessive noise, and in every other appropriate way to preserve as a part of the common heritage of this State its forests, wetlands, estuaries, beaches, historical sites, open lands, and places of beauty.

To accomplish the aforementioned public purposes, the State and its counties, cities and towns, and other units of local government may acquire by purchase or gift properties or interests in properties which shall, upon their special dedication to and acceptance by a law enacted by a vote of three-fifths of the members of each house of the General Assembly for those public purposes, constitute part of the ‘State Nature and Historic Preserve,’ and which shall not be used for other purposes except as authorized by law enacted by a vote of three-fifths of the members of each house of the General Assembly. The General Assembly shall prescribe by general law the conditions and procedures under which such properties or interests therein shall be dedicated for the aforementioned public purposes.

The bottom line is that it is a Constitutional duty for the powers that be to provide clean water and air for the citizens of NC. You would think that those in charge in NC would take seriously their Constitutional duties as indicated (in part) above. But the Tea-Publicans of North Carolina instead have taken a wrecking ball to their constitutional obligation to provide clean water and air for its citizens.  Instead, they have:

1. Assured dirtier drinking water by lifting the Jordan Lake rules, nine years in the making, and put them on hold. Jordan Lake is a drinking water source for Cary, Apex, Chatham County and other communities in the area. But the so-called representatives in the Raleigh capitol don’t give a fig. Jordan Lake has been polluted since the eighties. And in 2013, the state legislators want to go backwards even further because they do not want upstream communities to be responsible for the waste they pour into the watershed. (Too bad the EPA has been rendered ineffectual by too many years of Republican undermining. Had it not been, we would have a prayer of it moving in and helping us here.)

2. They barred the seeking of LEED certification for state government buildings.

3. They forbade any of the state’s scientists from studying the rising of sea levels. You have to be a Neanderthal to be so clearly anti-science and anti-progress.

4. They appropriated the water supply for the city of Asheville and took it out of Asheville’s control.

5. They moved ahead toward fracking,loading the Mining and Energy Commission with industry hacks.  No citizens or environmental interests need apply. Even the environmental seat on the MEC was handed to one with an interest in fracking. The lack of sunshine in the process is staggering. Fracking is probably why they won’t clean up Jordan Lake. They probably figure the frackers will ruin it anyway, even while they falsely profess that won’t happen. Meanwhile, citizens depending on well water are shafted. Most do knot realize that Cumnock shale  formation (to be fracked in a year or two once fracking commences) pierces the aquifer and thus all but certainly vulnerable to methane and other contamination.

6. Allowed the disposal of debris from demolition from manufacturing plants on the building’s premises.

7. Loosened the laws for landfills and shortened the distance between landfills and state game lands.

And those things are just what we know about. It will be weeks before we know everything they have been up to because many bills were tacked onto to bills on other subjects with no public hearings or sunlight of any kind. You have already heard some of the other mischief they ave been up to.  But moving backwards toward a dirty energy future and destroying the drinking water for hundreds of thousands is beyond the pale. Don’t North Carolina Virginia.

New Cartoon: Cuccinelli Will Not Be Pleased

0

( – promoted by lowkell)

As an editorial cartoonist, this race has already exceeded my wildest fantasies. And it's not even August.  

 photo co_anniversary500_zps902e05e2.jpg

Virginia Chapter Sierra Club honors Surovell with Award

0

Congratulations to Del. Scott Surovell on a well-deserved honor! 

Richmond, VA — For the first time, the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club voted to recognize members of the General Assembly with awards lauding their work in the Legislature. The Chapter’s Legislative Committee voted unanimously to honor Del. Scott Surovell with the Solar Champion Award to recognize his work on energy policy.

On receiving his award Del. Surovell offered the following quote, “Virginia has lagged behind other states in encouraging renewable energy. By adding solar thermal energy to Virginia's renewable energy portfolio, we are taking a small step to encourage people to invest in this technology. The Sierra Club's Virginia Chapter has been a vigilant voice for changing Virginia's renewable energy policy and I look forward to continuing to work with them towards effecting larger efforts to reduce Virginia's carbon footprint.”

The Delegate from Mount Vernon patroned a successful bill that will add solar thermal energy to the definition of renewable energy in the Code of Virginia, providing an incentive for investment in solar thermal under the Renewable Portfolio Standard. More solar thermal means cleaner air and a healthier future.

“Delegate Surovell has established a strong record in the House of Delegates promoting renewable and solar energy including HB 1917 to allow a utility to claim renewable thermal energy from within the state and HB 1916 to create a tax credit for solar energy systems. We are very pleased to honor Delegate Surovell with the Solar Champion Award, and to also recognize his leadership with Senator Ebbin to repeal the hybrid car tax,” said Pat Soriano, Political Chair of the Sierra Club Mount Vernon Group.

 

Inline image 1

Pictured here with Delegate Surovell is Pat Soriano, Political Chair of the Sierra Club Mount Vernon Group 

Video: New Ad Rips Cuccinelli for Anti-Climate-Science “Witch Hunt”

2

I’m very happy to see this, as Cuccinelli richly deserves to lose the election on this issue alone. As for the politics, as National Journal pointed out yesterday, it now makes a LOT of sense to talk about climate change. Why? In part, because of polls like one “released earlier this year by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication,” which “found that 58 percent of registered voters say they will consider a candidate’s position on global warming when deciding how to vote; among that group, 83 percent say global warming is happening, and 65 percent believe it is caused by human activity.” My favorite part of that poll: “Just 5 percent of registered voters believe global warming isn’t real and say that belief would influence their choice for president.” Also, voters under 35, basically think you’re an “ignorant,” “out of touch” “crazy” person if you deny climate science. All true, but still, not adjectives a politician necessarily wants attached to their name.

So yeah, let’s talk about climate change. Let’s also talk about Cuccinelli’s massive abuse of power and assault on academic freedom (or, as Cuckoo might call it, the “liberty pie” – heh). As if his climate science denial wasn’t enough of an automatic disqualifier for public office – just like if he denied evolution – Cuccinelli’s abuse of power is a sign that he’s dangerous and should NEVER be entrusted with any position of authority.  Period, end of story.

P.S. Also, needless to say, Cuccinelli’s assault on the University of Virginia, with its tens of thousands of loyal alumni, is not exactly the brightest move politically speaking…