Home Blog Page 3212

Pay Them More, Make It 100% Transparent

2



Let’s face it, the entire system for compensating Virginia General Assembly members if FUBAR.  First of all, it’s utterly absurd that House of Delegates members only receive $17,000 a year, and that Senators get only $18,000 a year, for their time and effort. Even if you throw in the $15,000 Ryan Nobles talks about in this story, it’s still only $32,000 or $33,000 a year.  How about we increase General Assembly members salaries while making it all completely transparent?  And when I say “transparent,” I also mean all the gifts and donations that come from special interests, corporations, lobbyists, etc.  As for this tiny $15,000, just tack it on to their salaries, make it 100% transparent (no more “wink wink”, to quote Paul Goldman), and be done with it.

h/t: NLS

Palindrome of the Future

1

A palindrome reads the same backwards as forward. This video reads the exact opposite backwards as forward.  Not only does it read the opposite, the meaning is the exact opposite..

If you have not seen this, or heard it, this is amazing, and gives this oldtimer an unexpected sense of wonder and hope for the future if this is the “next generation.”

This is only a 1 minute, 44 second video and it is brilliant.   Make sure you read as well as listen…forward and backward.

This is a video that was submitted in a contest by a 20-year old.   The contest was titled “u @ 50” by  AARP. This video won second place. When they showed it, everyone in the room was awe-struck and broke into spontaneous applause.  So simple and yet so brilliant.

Take a minute and watch it.

Jim Moran on Offshore Oil Drilling; Ken Cuccinelli as “Ideological Extremist”

4



In this video, Jim Moran explains very well the reasons why offshore oil drilling is a bad idea for Virginia. Among those reasons is that oil drilling would interfere with Navy operations.

Later in the show, Moran commented on Ken Cuccinelli’s assault on academic freedom. According to Moran, Cooch is an “ideological extremist” and his action against climate science at UVA is “pure harassment.”

In other comments, Moran argued that Virginia is “clearly…undertaxed” for our transportation needs, and that we really should have a higher gas tax devoted to transportation, particularly to public transportation.

It’s always an interesting show when Jim Moran’s on! 🙂

Rand Paul Steps in It Again (Suggests Obama is “unAmerican”)

20

Rand Paul is the political gift that keeps on giving.  Rand may be an effete country club snob and a doctor, but he is also an idiot. He says Obama’s remarks about BP sound “un-American.”  Apparently, Rand Paul doesn’t know the BP acronym is for British Petroleum.  

What I don’t like from the president’s administration is this sort of, you know, “I’ll put my boot heel on the throat of BP.” I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of business. I’ve heard nothing from BP about not paying for the spill. And I think it’s part of this sort of blame game society in the sense that it’s always got to be someone’s fault. Instead of the fact that maybe sometimes accidents happen. I mean, we had a mining accident that was very tragic and I’ve met a lot of these miners and their families. They’re very brave people to do a dangerous job. But then we come in and it’s always someone’s fault. Maybe sometimes accidents happen.

Aside from the outrageous statement that the president sounds “un-American,” Randy doesn’t get that the president is doing his job, which is to administer the government, which legitimately must balance the competing demands of citizens v. industry, citizens v government, and citizens v citizens.  Randy furthermore is so tone-deaf that he rips the President who must assure Americans that this company is held to account for its degradation of our coasts.

As 19% of our nations’ fishing and seafood businesses are destroyed by, their rebranding of “Beyond Petroleum” notwithstanding, a British multinational conglomerate, Rand Paul focuses on the big guy and not all the small businesses hurting.  The massive spill amounts to real harm to real people and businesses.  Should the damage spread up the Eastern seabord, the damage to natural resources, business large and small –and to people– would be unspeakable.

Of course, when you believe big corporations should get to do whatever they want, any statement by Obama appears to the warped Randy like the wrong thing to say.  And that is why Barack Obama is president and Rand Paul is not. It’s just another reason why Rand Paul should be routed from his Senate run this November.  

Perfect Pitch: Joe Sestak Should Give Framing Lessons

2

The above video is an excellent example of how Sestak frames his (and our) message.  Despite ample evidence that Joe is more than up to the task of flattening opponent Pat Toomey’s case, Toomey keeps setting himself up.  Toomey, the Club-for-Growther running against US Rep. Joe Sestak keeps laying the groundwork for Sestak’s first-rate comebacks.  Here’s the video of Sestak’s response to Toomey’s tongue-in-cheek suggestion that Sestak take a vacation.

What a great foil Toomey is!  He’s a Congressman too, but besides his drown government in the bathtub shtick, all he’s got is that he’s running as an “outsider” (Tsk). It’s getting to be fun listening to Sestak carefully put Toomey away in the campaign back-and-forth.  And the question is: Why can’t other Dems do this?  

For now, it’s a pleasure to hear Sestak perfectly make the Dems’ case. He’s delightfully effective and quick with his responses(slow-talkers drive me daffy–time is a resource and there’s precious little of it to make that sound-bite). But give Sestak more than a sound bite and he is spectacular. This is the kind of framing we have been waiting for.

I urge you to stay engaged with the Sestak campaign.  Here is his congressional home page. Here are some of his positions. It’ll give you that little thing called hope, for real.

Does Eric Cantor believe in Rand Paul’s “private racism”?

10

( – promoted by lowkell)

Last night I posted about Rand Paul’s strange obsession with protecting the free speech rights of small businessmen who happened to be racists, calling Paul’s approach “private racism.” Paul claims not to be a racist, but repeatedly expressed concern that the rights of small businessmen who happened to be racists should be respected.  Unfortunately, in Rand Paul’s definition, free speech includes the right to withhold critical services based on race.

Paul’s long, rambling defense of “private racism” on the Rachel Maddow Show prompted a gut check for many Republicans, especially those who happened to be undergoing interviews by media outlets at or about the time of Rand Paul’s remarks.  Eric Cantor was one of the handful of Republicans who refused to condemn Rand Paul’s remarks, and Cantor’s Democratic opponent Rick Waugh went after him for it:

On Thursday of this week Eric Cantor declined to take a stand in support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, nor in support of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The context of Cantor’s refusal is controversy in the last 48 hours over Republican Senatorial candidate Rand Paul’s statements regarding civil rights.  Rand Paul told Rachel Maddow this week that he opposes Title 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and that the law should not have played a role in the desegregation of restaurant lunch counters.  Rand argued that sound policy would provide some federal protections against discrimination – such as on public transportation – but not the full protection against discrimination currently afforded by federal law.   Although Rand fiercely argued that he is personally opposed to discrimination, he said that federal law plays too extensive a role in preventing discrimination: he made the point that although discrimination may be unfortunate and may be bad business, private business people should be able to discriminate against minorities, gays, Jewish people, or any other group of their choice.

Rand Paul’s position would clearly allow for the return of segregated lunch counters.   Yet Eric Cantor refused to state that Rand Paul’s positions should be adjusted even slightly.  On Washington Journal, Cantor declined to support the Civil Rights Act of 1964: “Not being familiar with the context of his response or his questions, I really can’t opine to his position,” Cantor said.

Unfortunately, Eric Cantor represents the people of the Seventh Congressional District of Virginia, and whether Cantor knows it or not, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 plays an essential role in the daily lives of tens of thousands of his constituents.

Those of us who live in the 7th Congressional District know that Eric Cantor is a little “off,” but I never suspected that Cantor was so far out of the mainstream that he’d go along with Rand Paul’s remarks.  Heck, Rand Paul was trying to withdraw what he said yesterday.  I mean even someone as far right as Jim DeMint expressed support for the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act and promised to talk to Rand Paul about these issues.  

Eric Cantor is way off base and out of touch with the mainstream on this issue.

Chicken Hawks and Chicken Littles Converge

0

The fusion of entertainment and information meets the no spin zone in Norfolk tonight. The residual chicken sh*t will not be the kind Terry McAuliffe champions. It is all about fertilizing an audience; an audience that pads the entertainers’ pockets by buying their schtick, their sponsors’ products, and their memorabilia.

This is a rescheduled Bold and Fresh Tour appearance. The first cancelled by a January blizzard that shut down Hampton Roads and continues to serve as a superficial proof source for the counter-climate change mob. These are the same science challenged minions who buy the “non-hybrid seeds, stored above the Arctic Circle” that Beck proffers.

Beck and O’Reilly saw an opportunity to double down on the local market for unsupported and base assertions by offering a 3PM matinee appearance today. They claimed the evening show was “sold out.” The good news is that there was no market for the additional show. Beck vigorously worked to hype the appearance to no avail, despite oodles of money spent on local advertising (a drop in the bucket for Beck but a windfall for local radio). They tried arranging appearances on local talk shows. His marketing crew couldn’t pull it off despite telling every area radio station’s sales manager that he or she was the best they’d dealt with anywhere. Good news: it seems it is a fiercely loyal but definitely finite market being strung along. But when the matinee was cancelled, the spin began. Suddenly it was a scheduling conflict that prevented the appearance. Bill…no spin?

Michael Savage refers to this as the Bald and Fat tour. You can be sure who the losers are in this P.T. Barnum goat rope. You can also be sure who the shameless clowns are. The good news if you have a bridge to sell is that the ball caps, tote bags, and travel mugs mark your prey. Tickets still remain for this evening’s show.  

Is Criticism Of Fred Malek for “Jew Counting” a “Distraction?”

2

The Washington Post’s Virginia Politics blog reports that “Del. Scott Surovell (D-Mount Vernon) said he and Del. David L. Englin (D-Alexandria), both of whom are Jewish, are scheduled to appear Friday morning on WTOP’s Politics Program with Mark Plotkin to denounce anew Fred Malek’s appointment to the Governor’s Commission on Government Reform and Restructuring because of Malek’s role in President Richard M. Nixon’s infamous Jew-hunting mission almost 40 years ago.”  In response, “Tucker Martin, a spokesman for the governor, repeated his view that the Democrats’ criticism is a distraction from substantive issues and feeds the perception of politics as a cynical enterprise.”

Believe it or not, I actually agree – sort of – with Tucker Martin on the “distraction” argument.  Of course, I’m not at all thrilled with Malek’s role in the corrupt, anti-Semitic Nixon White House, but that was 40 years ago and Malek’s been defended by ADL director Abraham Foxman and Sen. Diane Feinstein, who says Malek “has no bias of any kind whatsoever.”  Let’s assume that’s true, at least for argument purposes.

So, why do I say I agree with Martin that this line of attack on Malek is a “distraction?”  Because, very simply, there’s a lot stronger line of attack on Malek, and one that is directly relevant to him heading a “Government Reform Commission.” Namely, as Sen. Donald McEachin recently explained, “Just a few short years ago, Mr. Malek was forced to pay a personal fine of $100,000 for violations of the Securities and Exchange Act while his company paid an additional $150,000.”  What were those violations?  Get a load of this.

On August 12, 2003, the SEC filed a civil fraud lawsuit[18] against former Connecticut state Senate Majority Leader William DiBella for participating in a fraudulent scheme to invest $75 million of the state pension funds with Malek’s firm, Thayer Capital Partners.[18] [19] On May 18, 2007, DiBella and North Cove were found liable for aiding and abetting Silvester’s intentional violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Thayer was found in negligence of Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Thayer paid a civil penalty of $150,000, and Malek personally paid a fine of $100,000.[20]

As Donald McEachin says, “I am more dismayed and disturbed by Mr. Malek’s recent illegal behavior” than about his “Jew counting” in the Nixon White House 40 years ago. I strongly urge Delegates Surovell and Englin to talk about this issue, which is directly relevant to Malek heading up a “government reform” commission here in Virginia, when they appear on Mark Plotkin’s show this morning. Now that is a “substantive issue!”