Home Blog Page 3312

iPad Released at Apple Store in Arlington

0



As the Washington Post writes regarding a similar event in Bethesda, the people in line this morning were “a special type of technology enthusiast who get the first version of every Apple product: the Apple TV, iPhone, iPod, MacBook. They also enjoy the spectacle of first-day releases.” And as Howard Kurtz writes:

The iPad might turn out to be so revolutionary that we’ll look back on its unveiling like Alexander Graham Bell speaking to Mr. Watson. Or not. But Apple and its media maestro, Steve Jobs, are once again reaping what amounts to tens of millions of dollars in free publicity.

How Apple does it is part brilliant marketing, part mystery.  Now, we’ll see if the iPad turns out to be as revolutionary as some people suggest, or just another fancy-but-overhyped gadget for $500-%800.

Why Didn’t They Think of That?

3

Cross-posted at Blue Commonwealth.

It has been nearly three years since the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and the related malfeasance of Lehman and other Wall Street firms.   Hank Paulson has admitted Lehman’s balance sheet was bogus.  According to Robert Reich, Goldman Sacks helped Greece hide its public debt and then bet against it with credit default swaps, those risky derivatives, in the news so much in 2007-2009, to avoid risking its own capital.  If you think the scenario is familiar, think AIG.  By any stretch of the imagination, these overpaid and overfed hacks and flacks should have been left to suffer the consequences, stripped of their wealth and in prison.  Why hasn’t this happened?  We have waited and waited for economic reform we can believe in, which Wall Streeters are fighting tooth and nail.  We’ve been told that we can’t have the meaningful reform we crave, that we must accept “bipartisan” compromise.  The GOP slings its empty “free market” bull (bull, because they never actually mean a free market, but rather a rigged market, in practice). Then they blame an administration inheriting the effects of their party’s utter lack of fiscal stewardship.  Now they fight reform to fix it and assure proposed re-regulation is toothless.  And of course, it’s everyone’s fault but their own.  The faux-helpless foxes at the SEC guarded the hen house then.  Even our own side has acted fairly helpless in the face of so many misdeeds. Should the administration not use the tools and methods available to it, it will deserve later scrutiny and judgment.  I reserve judgment for the time being. However, as Reich observes, it turns out that we do not need “reform” to do something about it.

The oft-forgotten Sarbanes-Oxley (2002) bill was designed just for such an occasion, says Robert Reich.  In his article entitled “Fraud on the Street,” Robert Reich points out what many inside (and outside) of government  won’t admit to you.  To wit:

Sarbox, as it’s come to be known, was designed to stop this. It requires CEOs and other senior executives to take personal responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of their companies’ financial reports and to set up internal controls to assure the accuracy and completeness of the reports. If they don’t, they’re subject to fines and criminal penalties.

Sarbox is directly relevant to the off-the-balance-sheet derivative games Wall Street has been playing. No bank CEO can faithfully attest to the accuracy and completeness of its financial reports when derivatives guarantee that the reports are incomplete and deceptive.

This statement appears in the newest issue of The American Prospect.  For those who do not have the magazine, here is the link. Why didn’t they ( our administration and our Congressional leaders) think of that?  Sarbanes-Oxley can bring fraudulent Wall Streeters to justice. In an adaptation of his original article, Reich also makes his case for current law’s power to bring economic justice to those whose “apologies are cheap” (and very, very late).  You can read the adaption at Huffington Post.  

I do not suggest that Sarbanes-Oxley is all the reform we need.  But it is a start.  Reich raises a legitimate point, which we in the progressive media should drive home.  Why shouldn’t the administration bring economic justice by holding the culprits accountable?  But more to the point, why didn’t they think of that?

Rachel Maddow On Phony ACORN and “Climategate” “Scandals”

0

As Rachel Maddow says, these supposed “scandals” are complete “bull-pucky”, the “unmooring of politics from facts,” “the triumph of fake politics — outrage or advantage gleaned from stuff that’s not real.” Same thing with the Republicans’ supposed “outrage” over recess appointments (Bush did it and Republicans were fine with it then), the individual mandate (it’s a Republican idea), terrorism suspects being read their Miranda rights (again, they had no problem with this during the Bush administration), the stimulus (they admit it’s working great when they go back to their districts), etc., etc. Watch the video and get the long list of Republican “bull-pucky”; it would all be entertaining if it weren’t so damaging.

Colbert and Frum On the Ultimate Republican Heresy: Speaking the Truth

2

As Chris Bowers writes, [David Frum’s] segment was impressive for its lucidity and intellectual honesty, traits that are difficult to find in conservative commentators these days.” I couldn’t agree more and definitely recommend that you watch this. Plus, as is usually the case with Stephen Colbert, it’s very funny. Enjoy!

Susan Mariner Has “A Passion for Politics”

8



Now that Peter Rousselot is former Arlington County Democratic Committee chair, my new favorite chair has got to be Susan Mariner, of Virginia Beach.  Aside from being a kickass Democrat and progressive, Susan is a spitfire of energy, a superb leader, and a great friend, all of which she demonstrated during the Webb for Senate “ragtag army” days. For more on Susan, see here. Oh, and can someone please draft her to run for Congress? 🙂

A Few Words About Kenya

3

We are super excited to be posting on Blue Virginia!

We, Danielle Nierenberg and Bernard Pollack (aka BorderJumpers), are traveling across the continent of Africa looking at innovations around alleviating hunger and poverty. We are going to bring you a weekly diary whereby we share (in less than 500 words) observations from every country we visit. This week we start with Kenya!

Our entry begins in Maralal, Kenya, a place mostly known for its wildlife. And as we made the seven hour, bumpy trek from Nairobi-half of it on unpaved roads-we saw our fair share of water buffaloes, rhinos, impala, and giraffes. But we weren’t here to go on safari. We were here to meet with a group of pastoralists-livestock keepers who had agreed to meet with us and talk about the challenges they face.

Although most of these people don’t have access to cable TV or even radios, they do have a good sense of the challenges their fellow livestock keepers face all over Kenya: climate change, conflict over land and water access, and a lack of support from policy makers and leaders. They also understand that the world is changing. They know that many of their children won’t live the same kind of lives that their ancestors lived for centuries. Many will choose to go to the cities, but they said if their children become “landed,” they want them to be able to maintain links to the pastoralist way of life.

During our visit to the ‘big city,” Nairobi, we met a “self help” group of women farmers in Kibera-likely the largest slum in sub-Saharan Africa with a population anywhere between 700,00 and one million-who are raising vegetables on what they call “vertical farms.” But instead of skyscrapers, these farms are in tall sacks, filled with dirt, and the women grow crops in them on different levels by poking holes in the bags and planting seeds. More than 1,000 of their neighbors are growing food in a similar way. During 2007 and 2008 when there was conflict in the slums of Nairobi and no food could come into these areas, most residents didn’t go without because so many of them were growing crops-in sacks, vacant land, or elsewhere.

In Kerecho, Kenya we met with the Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union (KPAWU) and the Solidarity Center-an organization affiliated with the AFL-CIO that provides resources to hire organizers, conduct trainings, and offer communications and transportation support. The union, despite having more than 200,000 members in the agriculture sector, has still lost density over the last two decades. Companies are trying whatever they can to cut costs, including implementing child labor, and mechanizing the plucking industry.

But the union, like all of the people and organizations we met in Kenya, is demonstrating its resiliency and fighting back. Despite the challenges it faces, over the past couple months it has grown, with 6,000 tea workers joining, thanks to organizing efforts supported by the Solidarity Center.

If you enjoy our weekly diary we invite you to get involved:

1. Comment on our posts — we check for comments everyday and want to have a regular ongoing discussion with you.

2. Receive regular updates–Join the weekly BorderJumpers newsletter by clicking here.

3. Help keep our research going–If you know of any great projects or contacts in West Africa please connect us connect us by emailing, commenting or sending us a message on facebook.

“Kookinelli” – Virginia’s Embarrassment

10

Here he goes again. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli vows once more to sue the federal government. Now, he is challenging  the Obama administration and Environmental Protection Agency’s new fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks.

Cuccinelli has already filed suit against the EPA’s determination that it can regulate greenhouse gases because they cause global warming and are harmful to human health. A Cuccinelli  spokesman said the EPA’s announcement of fuel efficiency standards amounts to a “tacit denial” of Cooch’s insistence that the EPA reconsider its greenhouse gases determination.

Well, duh…Of course it does.

“The attorney general’s office asked the EPA to reopen its proceedings in light of the recent evidence that the reports the EPA was relying on for its decision contained erroneous and/or unverifiable global temperature and other data,” said spokesman Brian Gottstein. “We will file a notice of appeal with respect to today’s ruling [regarding mileage standards].”

This man elected as attorney general is becoming an ever-growing embarrassment for the Commonwealth. Cuccinelli needs to realize he is living in the 21st century, not in antebellum Virginia. Listen up, Cooch: The Confederacy lost the Civil War…Nullification and interposition are dead concepts, buried once and for all at Appomattox.

(Interposition is the act of a state opposing any federal action it believes encroaches on “states’ rights.”)

For anyone who thinks that this latest far-right outbreak of “states’ rights” absurd, sometimes dangerous, hatred for our 44th President has nothing to do with racism would do well to remember the last time “nullification and interposition” became a rallying cry of the far right in Virginia: the attempts in the 1950’s and 1960’s to integrate Southern schools.

At that time, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia adopted resolutions of “interposition and nullification,” saying that they had a legal right to oppose Brown v Board of Education and could, therefore, not  desegregate public schools. Virginia even used “massive resistance” to close schools where desegregation was scheduled, thus disrupting public education in several school districts. White students attended racist “academies” that were set up, while Black students were without any recourse for education.

Now, here we are in 2010 with Cooch echoing that dismal part of Virginia history by using “interposition and nullification” to try to refuse individual participation mandates in the new health care reform law, insisting that the passage of a bill by the General Assembly is sufficient grounds to do so, i.e., interposition.

As for his silly “interposition” of himself into EPA greenhouse gas emission regulations, Cooch is ignoring the impact of a ruling by the Supreme Court on that very issue.

In 2007 the court ruled that the EPA did have the right to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases. Cooch is tilting at the tiny windmill the court threw into that decision, when it said that it was not blocking states from suing the EPA to challenge such regulation.

To me, the most interesting part of that ruling is that the court was rejecting the Bush administration’s refusal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The Court said the EPA under Bush had simply provided a “laundry list” of reasons not to regulate such emissions. It had not tied its rationale to the Clean Air Act. The Court said that the “EPA has offered no reasoned explanation for its refusal to decide whether greenhouse gases cause or contribute to climate change.”

Cooch needs to realize that the Supreme Court in 2007 had the same basic composition of  “liberal” v “conservative” justices as the present court. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion, which Justices Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer joined. While Justice Sotomayor has replaced Justice Souter, she surely would rule the way he did.

Even the radical conservative wing of the court did not take a position on global warming. Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito, said in his dissent that his conclusion “involves no judgment on whether global warming exists, what causes it, or the extent of the problem.”

Cooch also might want to consider the fact that a British House of Commons investigation into some emails that are at the heart of climate change deniers insistence that data was being rigged has exonerated anyone from such an action. The investigative report also said that nothing in the more than 1,000 e-mails of scientists that were stolen and released challenges scientific consensus that “global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity.”

Those emails are at the heart of Cooch’s whole argument. Oh, I know nothing will change the Cooch’s mind. After all, it’s obvious that he thinks that he – like Gov. McDonnell’s mentor Pat Robertson – has the ear of the Almighty, thus making him immune to mistakes.

It’s going to be a very long four years, folks.