Tag: Clean Energy
But that wasn't quite the end of the story. Because by the end of the week, they also found that the groundwork they had laid with their lobbing, and their tenaciousness before the subcommittee, created an opening they would not otherwise have had.
First, the bad news, and plenty of it
Things started bleakly. The House Commerce and Labor Subcommittee on Energy turned back multiple proposals that would have benefited Virginia's small renewable energy and energy efficiency businesses, as well as their customers. Going down to defeat were bills to improve the renewable portfolio standard (HB 1913), create an energy efficiency resource standard (HB 1730), require a more rigorous study before utilities can impose standby charges (HB 1911), make third-party PPAs legal across the state (HB 1925), and enable an innovative vehicle-to-grid (V2G) project (HB 2073).
Bills referred to Senate Commerce and Labor are heard by the full committee, which meets on Monday afternoons. It consists of 14 members: 11 Republicans and 3 Democrats. They form a tough lineup; none of these senators received better than a "C" on the Sierra Club's Climate and Energy Scorecard.
The House bills are typically assigned to the 13-member Special Subcommittee on Energy (10 Republicans and 3 Democrats, no fixed schedule, but we've heard February 3d is the likely date). Bills that do not meet the approval of Dominion Power can expect a quick death here on an unrecorded voice vote, never to be heard from again. But on the plus side, the meetings are often quite lively, like old-fashioned hangings.
Net metering bills
Net metering is the policy that allows owners of solar (or other renewable) energy systems to be credited for the excess power they feed back into the grid when the systems produce a surplus; the owners use the credits when their systems aren't supplying power and they need to draw electricity from the grid. Virginia law restricts who can use net metering, and how much. Expanding net metering is a major goal of renewable energy advocates, who argue it offers a free market approach to growth-give customers the freedom to build solar projects, get the utility out of the way, and solar will thrive.
This year's initiatives include:
Some within the environmental community will disagree with me, and they would probably tell you the law was so bad that it should be repealed and replaced with a new more effective clean energy standard. I would agree if that were a possibility but, it is not.
Here are a couple of the realities which come to fruition if Virginia's voluntary RPS is repealed:
First, investments in clean, renewable energy are now subject to the strictest interpretation of the Virginia State Corporation Commission. The commission has never approved a full clean energy proposal put forward by Dominion. It has limited the size of the utility's energy efficiency and solar programs.
Although GOP districts hold 81 percent of the nation's wind power capacity, Republicans are deeply split on investing in wind (Mitt Romney, for example, drew criticism from fellow Republicans for opposing the PTC). Boehner's home state supports up to 6,000 wind jobs.According to the Tea Party, $5 billion a year to back hundreds of thousands of jobs harvesting clean, domestically-produced wind energy? Unaffordable! The billions we shovel to already-massively-profitable oil companies even though the top 5 oil companies alone banked $137 billion in profit just last year? Indispensable!
The GOP remains less divided on issues favoring Big Oil. Of the 47 Republicans asking Boehner to end the wind investments, 46 voted in March 2011 against closing tax loopholes that let Big Oil collect $4 billion in annual subsidies. The one outlier, GOP Rep. Richard Hanna, was a no-vote that day. According to OpenSecrets, these representatives have received a total $2.2 million from the oil and gas industry, in an election cycle where Republicans have collected 89 percent of the oil industry's contributions. Republicans have maintained these tax breaks are "essential" to an industry posting record-breaking profits.
It's just more proof the Tea Party is a fraud. They don't care about fiscal responsibility or keeping the boot of big government off the little guy's neck - they care about whatever their billionaire corporate funders tell them to care about.
To more clearly elucidate their mutual views on energy, government regulations, and President Obama's healthcare reform, George Allen and 12 local business leaders met for a morning roundtable discussion Friday in Springfield.
Without stepping too far out of bounds of his limited political lexicon, George Allen stated that "My thoughts on energy are that it should be affordable, reliable and preferably American." The ironic thing about this comment is that if he were to become Virginia's next U.S. senator and he were to help approve the Keystone XL Pipeline, it's unclear how much of the crude would stay in the U.S.! Oh, and the price of oil would also increase in the U.S.
What's more, George Allen and his political and business allies clearly have a good time annihilating the environment, at least if it means "more jobs." Last I checked, though, the clean energy sector also exists in the U.S., a sector which also creates "more jobs." But in the world of George Allen, there are "immediate" sources of energy ready to be sucked up and spewed out into the atmosphere, so why not use them?
If you didn't already know about the potential of clean energy to create jobs and clean our air in Virginia and the wider United States, you soon might thanks to a "seven-figure TV ad buy" by The National Wildlife Federation Action Fund and Earthjustice that began airing in Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania on Thursday.
In Virginia, the ads will play in Richmond, Norfolk, and Roanoke.
The TV ad discusses a recent U.S. Department of Labor study which found that moving towards a green economy will both create jobs in the U.S. as well as clean up our air. The ad also seeks to raise the public's awareness and support for the Environmental Protection Agency's new standards for clean air to reduce industrial air pollution from our country's power plants.
For a lot of Virginians, the benefits of clean energy remains a hard sell (hence the advertisements). Many Virginians apparently believe there is a grave conspiracy under way to clean our air and save the planet from self-induced catastrophe!
Whatever the reasons, the TV ads could not have come at a better time as environmental groups inside the commonwealth, like the Sierra Club and CCAN, have ramped up their pressure on Virginia's utilities to move away from fossil fuels like natural gas, coal, and oil towards cleaner forms of energy like wind and solar.