Latest Unhinged Rantings/Ravings by 2013 Virginia GOP Nominee for Lt. Governor
Just in case you missed the latest unhinged rantings/ravings by 2013 Virginia GOP nominee for Lt. Governor E.W. Jackson. Enjoy (?).
Just in case you missed the latest unhinged rantings/ravings by 2013 Virginia GOP nominee for Lt. Governor E.W. Jackson. Enjoy (?).
[Starting to run in newspapers in the 6th District– part of my strategy of “See the evil. Call it out. Press the Battle.”*]
In a healthy democracy, differing points of view contend to shape the destiny of the society.
What does it mean, however, when a major subculture of that society is perennially of but one mind?
From the 1830s until the Civil War, there was no robust debate in the politics of white Southerners about the rightness of slavery. It was the major issue in the nation as a whole, but within the South one point of view was virtually unchallenged.
In the aftermath of the Civil War, there was no robust debate in the politics of white Southerners about the rightness of re-imposing a regime of racial domination and intimidation (Jim Crow). That regime was a blatant violation of the newly amended U.S. Constitution. The epidemic of lynchings that was intended to intimidate the black population became a blot on the reputation of the United States. But in the South, this system of terror and domination faced no major challenges.
Likewise in the 1950s and 1960s, there was no robust debate in the politics of white Southerners about the rightness of resisting the judicial mandate to end the regime of segregation. No major faction emerged to say that the fraud of “separate but equal” was an injustice that should be abandoned.
Most Americans – including most white Southerners, I suspect – would agree now that slavery was wrong, Jim Crow was wrong, and desegregation was right. But not at the time, not when it mattered.
Such uniformity of political position is unnatural. It can happen only if people have been taught by the culture not to think for themselves, or taught not to express what they think if it differs from the dogma imposed by their political community.
Either way, it is contrary to how a democracy is supposed to work.
We see that same kind of dogma in the Republican Party of today.
In that party, whose base of power lies in the South, there is no robust debate on a host of important issues that face the nation. Just take a look at the range of views – or lack of such range – among the nearly twenty Republican candidates for president.
Although many Republicans feel embarrassed by the intemperance of the statements from Donald Trump, no Republican candidate is advocating anything other than a hard-line, anti-immigrant position.
Surely there should be room in that national party for the more compassionate, path-to-citizenship position that the most recent Republican president, George W. Bush, advocated nearly a decade ago (and that is supported by a majority of the American public). But in the candidate debates, there probably will be near-uniformity on the issue.
(The one outlier, Marco Rubio, has repudiated the immigration reform legislation he proposed in 2013.)
Same with climate change. There is no sign that there will be a single strong advocate, on the Republican presidential debate stage, for the position – morally sound, and in line with the views of 97% of the world’s top experts on the subject — that the Pope has taken on the climate crisis.
(In 2012, one Republican presidential candidate – former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman – supported the warnings of the scientific experts. But even he eventually recanted, and came back in line with the science-denial of all the other candidates.)
Likewise on other major issues America faces, where the Republicans seem unanimous on not raising taxes on the richest of the rich, who have lately tripled their share of our national wealth, (while the majority of Americans have been losing ground); and on not stopping the sale of our government to the highest bidder, by overturning the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.
The ideal of American democracy has always been a “marketplace of ideas” in which different views compete for people’s allegiance. But what this culture of dogma creates is no market but a monopoly-within which the positions taken on vital issues need contend with no competition from other views.
Unchallenged, even though history often proves those positions to have been morally wrong and bad for the country.
[This strategy is explained and developed in my new book, WHAT WE’RE UP AGAINST: The Destructive Force at Work in Our World– and How We Can Defeat It. Advance copies of the book, which will be officially released in the latter half of September, can be acquired here.
Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, July 12. Also check out David Letterman’s Top 10 list on Donald Trump.
*‘Hillarynomics’: A sneak preview (“The candidate’s first major econ speech on Monday zeroes in on middle-class wages; goes after corporations, the 1%, and Uber.”)
*Donald Trump: ‘Take back the heart of our country’ (“Illegal immigrants, the Mexican government, Macy’s, NBC and fellow GOP candidate Jeb Bush were among the targets of his scorn in an Arizona speech.”)
*Compromise on Greece eludes Europeans
*White House contenders Trump, Bush in virtual dead heat: Reuters/Ipsos poll
*Can Hillary Clinton lead the Keystone army? (“The Democratic candidates are fighting for the support of an army of liberal green activists.”)
*Bernie Sanders Parrots the NRA (“The left’s favorite presidential candidate parrots gun nuts and even voted to protect gun manufacturers from lawsuits.”)
*GOP must destroy Donald Trump before he destroys them. It may already be too late (“Trump is the latest Joseph McCarthy or George Wallace. The GOP must excise the poison. History says they won’t”)
*America is ready for socialism! Massive majorities back Bernie Sanders on the issues – and disdain Donald Trump
*Kaine: The twofold mission for Congress
*Brink: Landmark anniversaries for the nation’s safety net (“As the Older Americans Act enters its second half century, its mission of improving the lives of our nation’s older adults faces significant challenges.”)
*Va. Republican Party offers ‘Hillary Clinton Press Lasso’ (Lovely.)
*Schapiro: McDonnell’s options for avoiding prison fading fast
*Dynamic Dominion would explore race relations
*What denying Medicaid expansion looks like
*More than 1,000 see ex-President Carter at Costco
*McDonnell supporters urge donations to his legal defense
*Chesapeake homeowners get six months to connect to city services
*Is a casino in Va.’s future now that the Pamunkey have U.S. recognition?
*Amid rapid change, Sons of Confederate Veterans will regroup in Richmond
*Hard feelings over school boundaries prompt alleged assault in Virginia
*Election workers resign in protest of Botetourt registrar’s ouster
*Espinosa hits a key three-run homer to lead the Nats over the O’s
*D.C. area forecast: A sunny and shower-free Sunday, before daily storm chances return
Every day, in addition to its almost complete failure to cover what’s really important, the corporate media manages to churn out reams and reams of idiocy, irrelevancy, “if it bleeds it leads” sensationalism, fearmongering, and false equivalency, among many other failings. The national political “journalist” class is a prime exemplar, focused almost solely on process (who’s raised the most money) and horse-race (who’s up/down in the polls) coverage, with essentially zero substantive discussion of the main issues that matter – starting with climate change, by far the #1 issue facing humanity, and continuing on to other crucial issues – other than how a particular candidate’s stand on a particular issue might impact his/her chances of winning their party’s nomination. Then there’s the false equivalency (“both sides” blah blah blah) and the utter failure to call out the Republican Party for what it is – a radical, extreme, “insurgent outlier in American politics”.
The latest such idiocy is a real doozy: that somehow Sen. Bernie Sanders is “the left’s equivalent” of right-wing Republican 2016 Presidential candidate Donald Trump. For just a couple examples of this Big Lie idiocy, see The unexpected rise of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump (Republican pundit Kathleen Parker’s version of the False Equivalency Big Lie)and Bernie Sanders Is The Left’s Trump (Ana Marie Cox falsely claims “t’s a match-up borne of extremists’ fevered dreams: Trump vs. Sanders.”). I also saw this garbage on a right-wing Virginia political blog, which basically argued that both Trump and Sanders are the “extremes” in their respective parties.
Of course, this is all complete horse manure. Let me just quote from Fox News’ big Bernie Sanders lie: The right’s laughably lame effort to link Donald Trump and Sanders:
Bernie Sanders, whatever you think of him, is a serious person with real ideas. He’s been a public servant since 1981, when he was elected mayor of Burlington, Vermont. He’s now the longest-serving independent in the history of Congress. And his bid for the presidency, while a long shot, is clearly earnest.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, is a clown – a pompous, spray-tanned clown. More important, he’s not actually running for president. His candidacy is a piece of performance art, a self-promoting circus…
…Only in the Republican Party do unserious candidates emerge as contenders. Only in the Republican Party are half-baked celebrities allowed to hijack the process to promote their private careers. Only among conservative Republicans are hucksters like Trump embraced. Democrats can’t point these truths out enough.
But that’s just a small part of the idiocy of this false equivalency between Sanders and Trump. Here are a few other reasons why there is simply no comparison whatsoever.
1. As a multi-billionaire, Trump has unlimited money, while Sanders has almost no money of his own.
2. Trump is either a racist/xenophobe himself, and/or appealing in crude, demagogic fashion to the many racists/xenophobes in his party’s “likely voter” base. Sanders is in no way/shape/form a racist or bigot, nor is any significant Democratic politician, nor are Sanders or any other significant (or even minor) Democratic politician pandering to racists and bigots. All of that went out the door when the “Dixiecrat” wing of the Democratic Party defected to the former “Party of Lincoln” after passage of the Voting Rights Act, Civil Rights Act, etc, in the early to mid 1960s.
3. Trump’s hateful, crazy ideas are (thank goodness) not anywhere near to the majority in America. In stark contrast, Sanders’ ideas are very much in the majority. For more on that, see America is ready for socialism! Massive majorities back Bernie Sanders on the issues – and disdain Donald Trump (“Trump channels the right’s angry Fox News id. But Sanders speaks to America’s soul – and our values”), which correctly argues that “Bernie Sanders is the exact opposite of Trump,” and also points to polling which indicates that Sanders’ specific policy views on a wide variety of issues — from clean energy to a stronger social safety net to universal health care to slashing the burden of student loan debt to ending gerrymandering to getting money out of politics to…the list goes on and on — are “all are extremely popular, with support across the political spectrum.” Is there any evidence that Trump’s heinous views are in the majority, or even close to the majority, on almost any topic?
4. One thing I do agree with is that neither the bigoted extremist clown Donald Trump nor the serious, substancive, progressive Bernie Sanders are outside the majority within their own party’s bases. In Trump’s case, the fact is that he’s in first or second place in state and national polls of Republican primary voters not because these people don’t know what Trump stands for, but because they DO know what Trump stands for and agree with him (they also like the blunt, crude, obnoxious, in-your-face way that Trump expresses his views). And what does the Democratic “base” like about Bernie Sanders? Simple: they agree with his views on the vast majority of issues (as do Hillary Clinton, Martin O’Malley, and many others, I’d argue); they see him as authentic (which he certainly is), they seem him as not owned/operated by powerful, wealthy and/or corporate interests (also true).
5. Finally, just to summarize the utter lack of equivalency between bigoted, extremist clown Trump and serious, substantive progressive Sanders: a) Trump’s vile views are extreme while Sanders’ mainstream progressive views are standard for most advanced, industrialized nations in the world; and b) Trump’s vile views are in the minority of the American people (thank goodness), while Sanders’ mainstream progressive views are overwhelmingly in the majority of the American people.
Yes, I’m well aware that the corporate media’s not going to stop doing what they do, but I just wanted to get this off my chest. By the way, I’m undecided in the Democratic primary contest, other than that I have absolutely ruled out considering Jim Webb, barring a massive, immediate change on his part regarding climate change in particular. Other than that, I like and admire Hillary Clinton, Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders, but my #1 goal is to make sure Democrats win the White House in 2016, so what I want to see is which of those candidates is most likely to accomplish that objective before I decide who to support. One thing’s for sure, and hopefully we all can agree on this: ANY of the Democratic candidates would be better than the climate-science-denying, government-hating, war-and-violence-loving, torture-condoning, LGBT-bashing, far-right-wing-pandering, etc. Republican field.
Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, July 11. Also see President Obama’s weekly address, in which he “discusses a new rule announced by his Administration to make it easier for communities to implement the Fair Housing Act.”
*Psychologists Shielded U.S. Torture Efforts, Report Finds (Anyone who participated in torturing, authorizing torture or abetting it needs to face charges and posssibly jail time for war crimes.)
*Marco Rubio vows he’ll take away women’s right to choose ‘at home and around the world’ (Disgusting, but so Republican.)
*After defiance, Greece poised to accept austerity
*Blame John Boehner for the House GOP’s Confederate flag fiasco
*Don’t believe Mr. Boehner’s latest phony excuse on immigration
*FBI: Breakdown in background check system allowed Dylann Roof to buy gun
*Reddit’s Faction of Racist Trolls Celebrates CEO Ellen Pao’s Resignation
*Pat Buchanan warns of another Civil War: The time of mass right-wing civil disobedience is at hand (This guy has always been a racist, anti-Semite, etc. The questiona are, why has the media accepted him as legitimate, and why has he had such a large following in the Republican Party?)
*Scott Walker Poised To Give Payday Lenders Radical New Powers To Prey On The Poor (Another reason to despise this guy.)
*Court rejects ex-Va. Gov. McDonnell’s bid to have convictions thrown out
*Editorial: Bob McDonnell’s conviction stands (“The decision also delivers a warning – not that any further warning was needed – to Virginia’s political class. The commonwealth’s casual culture of the gift is no longer acceptable, and those who sustain it could be writing themselves a ticket to prison.” Tommy Norment? Bill Howell? Dick Saslaw? You guys paying attention here?)
*Roanoke Democratic chair Charles Withers reportedly plans to resign
*Why does Virginia have a road named after Jefferson Davis? (Answer: It shouldn’t.)
*Small business customers targeted in Dominion Virginia Power scam, officials say
*I-95 express lanes continue to rake in the money, ringing up $15 million in the second quarter
*McAuliffe rips toll deal, announces relief for Portsmouth motorists
*VA official: South Hampton Roads veterans care center ‘high priority’
*Contractors say data breach hurts hiring for Navy work in Hampton Roads
*Orioles beat Nats 3-2 as Roark gives up 9th-inning home run to Schoop
*D.C. area forecast: Rain focuses D.C. and south this morning, then drying; Quite sunny on Sunday
( – promoted by lowkell)
Several news outlets throughout Virginia are reporting that Danville City Councilmember Larry Campbell and his family are being threatened by some group over his pursuit in removing the Confederate flag from the Sutherlin Mansion. Two other Virginians have been cited as having been threatened by the group as well.
It is incredibly disturbing and saddening to think that intimidation is blooming within the southern portion of Virginia. I am dismayed that rather than writing a letter to the editor, staging a protest, starting a petition or launching a campaign that a group would instead threaten a person and their family. The fact that a group of people believed that these tactics would not only work, but were preferable against all other options suggests that some small faction of society has lost their ability to reason. The absence of logic and respect is astounding.
Virginia should be grateful that Councilmember Larry Campbell has not allowed these threats to alter his course. By continuing to stand for and pursue what he believes in he not only discourages such behavior but also illustrates true leadership.
Links: GoDanRiver
WDBJ 7
Here are a few excerpts from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit opinion in the Bob McDonnell corruption case. A correct one, IMHO, as I always saw quid-pro-quo corruption here. Now, Virginia needs to toughen up its almost non-existent ethics laws so that crap that’s “legal” right now becomes illegal. Of course, that would crimp the style of “legalized corruption” people such as Bill “ALEC” Howell, Tommy Norment Dick Saslaw, etc., but too bad.
*”Appellant appeals his convictions, alleging a multitude of errors…Upon consideration of each of Appellant’s contentions, we conclude that the jury’s verdict must stand and that the district court’s judgment should be affirmed.”
*”The jury also found Mrs. McDonnell guilty of eight counts of corruption and one count of obstruction of an official proceeding. The jury found her not guilty of three counts of corruption and one count of making a false statement. Her appeal is not at issue here, as it is pursued separately.”
*”Appellant contends that he was entitled to a trial separate from the trial of Mrs. McDonnell…Appellant simply failed to provide adequate justification for his claim that a severance was warranted. He was not entitled to an ex parte examination of his evidence; he was not entitled to deferral of the district court’s ruling. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Appellant’s motion to sever.”
*”Appellant has thus failed to show that the court’s ‘official act’ instructions, taken as a whole, were anything less than a ‘fair and accurate statement of law.'”
*”In sum, we are satisfied that the court properly instructed the jury on the ‘quid pro quo’ requirement of the charged offenses. Accordingly, we reject Appellant’s claim of instructional error in that respect.”
*”In the first place, we reject Appellant’s contention that the Government’s evidence cannot satisfy the ‘official act’ requirement.” *”Critically, the Government’s evidence demonstrated a close relationship between Appellant’s official acts and the money, loans, gifts, and favors provided by Williams to Appellant and Mrs. McDonnell.”
*”The temporal relationship between the ‘quids’ and ‘quos’ — the gifts, payments, loans, and favors and the official acts — constitute compelling evidence of corrupt intent.”
*”Throughout the two years during which Appellant was performing the official acts alleged, Williams lavished Appellant with shopping sprees, money, loans, golf outings, and vacations…Appellant and Williams did not know each other until after Appellant was elected Governor.”
*”This evidence established that Appellant received money, loans, favors, and gifts from Williams in exchange for official acts to help Williams secure independent testing of Anatabloc. In light of the foregoing, the jury could readily infer that there were multiple quid pro quo payments, and that Appellant acted in the absence of good faith and with the necessary corrupt intent.”
*”Appellant has thereby failed to sustain his heavy burden of showing that the Government’s evidence was inadequate.”
Significantly, the jury found the necessary corrupt intent despite being instructed extensively on Appellant’s “good faith” defense and hearing from an array of witnesses who testified to Appellant’s honesty, integrity, respect for the law, and good character. The jury was instructed not only that “if a defendant believed in good faith that he or she was acting properly . . . there would be no crime,” but also that “evidence of good character alone may create a reasonable doubt as to a defendant’s guilt.” See J.A. 7692, 7694. Appellant’s character witnesses included cabinet members from his time as Governor of Virginia, as well as longtime friends such as Father Timothy R. Scully, a Catholic priest and University of Notre Dame professor who met Appellant in 1972 when they became college roommates.
*”Appellant received a fair trial and was duly convicted by a jury of his fellow Virginians. We have no cause to undo what has been done. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.“
If you’ve been following Congress this week you’ll know about the back and forth fight over moving to end the sale of Confederate flag items at National Parks, and to end the decoration of graves with the flag during Confederate Memorial. Politico reports:
The battle was joined Tuesday night, when Democrats offered a series of amendments to prohibit Confederate flags from being displayed at federal cemeteries, and to stop the U.S. Park Service from doing business with enterprises that sell the flags. These flags are typically displayed alongside the centuries-old tombstones of deceased confederate soldiers.
“This House now has an opportunity to add its voice to end the promotion of the cruel, racist legacy of the Confederacy,” California Rep. Jared Huffman said in a floor speech before his initial amendment was adopted Tuesday.
The measures passed by voice vote.
But quickly, Southern Republicans approached GOP leadership and said they would vote against the Interior spending bill if that language was included. The amendment was offered Wednesday night after whole and partial congressional delegations from Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, Alabama and Virginia, among possibly others, related their concerns to GOP leaders.
So far, only one Mississippi Congressman has been vocal in indicating that he was opposed to the move to end decoration national cemeteries with the Confederate flag. But reports are that large numbers of Southern Republicans, as many as 100 in total, were ready to revolt against the move.
What members of the Virginia delegation are working behind the scenes to defend the Confederate flag?
Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, July 10.
*Greece’s Economy Is a Lesson for Republicans in the U.S. (“The point is that if you really worry that the U.S. might turn into Greece, you should focus your concern on America’s right. Because if the right gets its way on economic policy – slashing spending while blocking any offsetting monetary easing – it will, in effect, bring the policies behind the Greek disaster to America.”)
*Greek crisis: Alexis Tsipras urges MPs to back bailout plan – live updates
*Markets toast Greek bid to clinch debt deal
*22.1 million compromised by OPM breaches
*Protesters want Trump’s name removed from D.C. building (Time for all the construction workers to walk out.)
*Unbridled capitalism is the ‘dung of the devil’, says Pope Francis (“The pontiff condemns the impoverishment of developing countries by the world economic order and apologised for the church’s treatment of native Americans”)
*Donald Trump is Democrats’ greatest gift: Why his buffoonish politics threaten to bring down his entire party
*Hillary Clinton’s push on gun control marks a shift in presidential politics
*Bernie Sanders gets a boisterous welcome in Arlington
*Actually, Sanctuary Cities Are Safer (“Here’s why all the vitriol we’re hearing right now is misguided.”)
*Our view: Here’s who should back Gilmore for president (“Based on his record and the damage he did the Republican brand in Virginia, there’s one group who ought to be taking to Twitter in the next few weeks to talk up Gilmore at every opportunity. That would be Democrats.”)
*Virginia Senate is up for grabs, and Virginia Beach race will play a part
*Herring: Tunnel toll late fees can’t be used to pad operator’s revenue
*Sons of Confederate Veterans join court battle over license plates
*Study says power bills could fall thanks to new federal rules
*Overdue recognition for the Pamunkey
*Ex-Loudoun sheriff’s deputy charged with stealing asset forfeiture money
*McAuliffe teases budget surplus, warns of sequestration
*Change the Washington football team’s insulting name
*D.C. area forecast: Less rain and lower humidity, but still fairly typical July weather
I just got back from a two-hour public policy forum in Arlington, Virginia, entitled “Rebooting Our Policy Agenda to Reclaim the American Dream,” and featuring Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA8) as special guest speakers from the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC). The room was at capacity (300 people? 500 people according to the Washington Post), with enthusiastic Bernie Sanders supporters (and others) arriving an hour or more early to make sure they got a good seat. Rep. Beyer gave an excellent speech whose theme was thesis/antithesis/synthesis – are we making progress in America? Then, Sen. Sanders gave a 1/2 hour or so stemwinder which had the crowd fired up, sometimes on their feet cheering him on. Finally, there were questions and answers for the last 45 minutes or so, topics ranging from international trade (the progressive crowd was much more with Sanders than with Beyer on this one) to guns (Sanders took some tough questioning from a gun safety mom regarding some of his votes, and his general attitude towards guns) to campaign finance reform, Citizens United, health care, and much more. I’m going to upload the videos in the order they are available on YouTube, then possibly reorganize them later. With that…enjoy! 🙂