Home Blog Page 3256

Cooch: Ricky Martin Not Gay

2

Wow, Cooch has really gone too far this time!

Virginia’s Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli filed a lawsuit earlier this morning in the United States District Court in Richmond asserting that Ricky Martin is not gay on the basis that his hit song “She Bangs” clearly states otherwise.  He further posited that to state you are gay after swaying your hips suggestively at the MTV Movie awards is unconstitutional…

Should we start a petition drive to condemn Ken Cuccinelli? How about a recall vote?  Protests and marches outside his office?  Obviously, this latest lawsuit is outrageous and must be stopped!  The only problem is, nobody would take us seriously because it’s April Fools Day and you know how that goes. 😉

h/t: Adam Ebbin

“Watch Wolf Go Moderate”

0

An intriguing blog post at “In Through The Out Door”.

With the announcement yesterday by James Trautz that he is withdrawing as a Republican challenger in the 10th District against Rep. Frank R. Wolf, I’m going to make a prediction.

Wolf took a sharp right turn in his legislating over the past few months in an attempt to woo the tea party element to his campaign. But with the far-right challenger out of the picture, expect Wolf to move away from the fringe of the party and move towards the center, courting the moderate independents that make up a majority of the 10th District in Loudoun and Fairfax counties.

Also expect to see more “franked” mail arriving in your mailboxes; Wolf recently sent out 3 pieces of “constituent literature”, paid for at taxpayer expense, that looked very much like campaign mailers. Of course, it’s illegal to send campaign flyers at taxpayer expense, which is why those mailers are marked as “newsletters”.

For more on Frank Wolf’s lurch to the right in recent months, see “Frank Wolf: For it, before he was against it” by Rich Anthony.  As Rich points out, “Wolf has taken to repeated attacks on President Obama and his administration over the last year, causing many to speculate that [Wolf] may be concerned about his primary against self-described ‘tea party candidate’ Jim Trautz.” Now that Trautz is out of the picture, will we see Wolf breaking with Eric Cantor, John Boehner, and the “Party of No” in general? I’m not holding my breath, especially given that Wolf really is a right-wing Republican at his core, but it’s something to keep an eye on.

Of course, Wolf never was the “moderate” he sometimes masqueraded as before Barack Obama became president. But since then, Wolf has voted in hard-right-wing Republican lockstep against clean energy, health care reform, “Jobs for Main Street”, economic recovery, and many other top priorities for America and for his district.  

Of course, you’d never know any of that from the corporate media, which wouldn’t write something critical about their pal Frank Wolf if it was the last story on earth. Actually, come to think of it, when was the last time you saw anything at all in the Washington Post about the 10th CD race? Well, don’t be surprised if you never do. That is, until the obligatory Post endorsement of “moderate” (yes, the Post is largely responsible for pushing this false meme) Wolf this fall, that is. With the media completely failing to do its job, no wonder why Wolf is able to sculpt his image to his liking through his “franked” mailings. At your expense, of course.

P.S. Unlike Wolf’s votes for powerful, moneyed interests over middle class Americans, Rich Anthony supports “Main Street” over “Wall Street”.  What a concept, huh?

If Bob McDonnell Applauds Something, You Know It’s Bad

13



Ironically, as McDonnell makes his statement about offshore oil drilling, the wind is howling. The reason I say “ironically” is that it would be far, far better to focus our energies – pun intended – on developing offshore wind than on wasting time and money with the wild goose chase of “drilling our way to energy independence.”  Perhaps not ironic, but appropriate, about the blowing wind is how much hot air is being spewed around today about offshore oil drilling by people who don’t know the first thing about U.S. oil reserves, world oil markets, offshore potential, or the relative cost of other alternatives like energy efficiency and clean renewables.  If they did, perhaps they’d feel differently about today’s news, but god forbid they should make the effort to actually research this and think it through carefully. But no…

Anyway, let me just leave you with a few statements from environmental groups that express many of my thoughts as well.

*JR Tolbert of Environment Virginia says, “There is no need to threaten our beaches, wildlife and tourism with oil spills and pollution when we have much better solutions — putting cleaner cars on the road today that will dramatically cut oil consumption; shifting to plug-in cars powered by the wind and the sun that use little to no oil and investing more in public transportation.”  Tolbert adds, “At a time when we need to tackle both our dependence on oil and the threat of global warming pollution, this proposal takes us backward. More offshore drilling means more oil consumption and more global warming pollution.”

*Glen Besa of the Virginia Sierra Club says, “There are not only the risks of spills both chronic and catastrophic but also the industrialization of our coastal communities that would either debilitate or destroy Virginia’s coastal economy.” Besa adds, “For just the Mid-Atlantic area alone, the annual value of these sustainable activities is almost 4 times that of oil and gas extraction.  That’s $13.55 billion from industries completely dependent on clean beaches and healthy ocean waters compared to $3.7 billion from dwindling nonrenewable risky source that in Virginia’s case represents a mere 6.5 days of supply before it’s exhausted.”

*Eileen Levandoski of the Virginia Sierra Club says, “Encroachment in the Virginia CAPES operating area, where the Navy has maintained its opposition to Virginia drilling, would provide compelling reason for Navy to move its forces to states like Florida that protect offshore training ranges from drilling. The loss of Oceana jets means a net loss of 11,000 jobs, $773 million in annual payroll, and $452 million in annual local contracting.  This loss of jobs dwarfs even the most speculative of job creation estimates from Virginia drilling.”

Steele Pushing Right Wing XXX-tremism

0

This is cross-posted at Leaving My Marc.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
2 Girls 1 GOP
www.thedailyshow.com

Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Reform

I’m guessing expenditures on faux lesbian bondage-themed strip clubs by the Republican National Committee will not sit well with social conservatives and potential Republican donors. What’s most surprising is the “lack of vocal opposition to Steele” amongst Republicans, notes the Washington Post.

Steele has come under fire recently for a recent expenditure used to take several donors to an adult-themed strip club, to the tune of $2K. Steele is also under fire for other “lavish” spending — $17K for private planes, $13K for limos and car service and $9K for a trip to a Beverly Hills Hotel. A former Republican opponent of Steele had a warning for Republicans:

Katon Dawson, a South Carolina Republican who lost to Steele in the contest for the RNC chairmanship, said in an interview that the committee needs to demonstrate fiscal responsibility at a time when the party is attacking Democrats on spending issues.

It’s funny how Republicans are so concerned with out of control spending in Washington. If this proves anything, it is that Republicans are still being Republicans. After all, wasn’t it the Democrats who handed the Republicans a $900 billion budget surplus only to have it squandered, through out of control deficit spending, and turned it into an $11 trillion deficit? They also voted against a health care reform bill that will reduce the deficit by over $1 trillion over the next 20-years.

Regardless of the extravagant spending by Steele, including a trip to a bondage-themed strip club, Republicans appear to have his back.

“Republicans are sticking together to get back the majority and are willing to sweep family problems under the rug,” said Ron Bonjean, a former top House GOP staffer.

This is the same attitude that Republicans had when they got us into our current fiscal mess, which President Obama and Congressional Democrats have been fixing ever since regaining control. The Republicans haven’t seemed to learn their lesson. Haven’t Republicans swept enough “problems under the rug” and on the backs of future generations of Americans? Americans have a choice come November: vote for Republicans who will continue to “sweep problems under the rug” and hope that they go away or vote for Democrats who will deal directly with the problems our nation faces, while continuing to fight for middle-class families and small businesses.

My vote goes to the Democrats!

UPDATE: According to CNN, Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, issued the following statement on the RNCs strip club expenditure:

I’ve hinted at this before, but now I am saying it – don’t give money to the RNC.

Penny Nance, the head of Conservative Women for America, also issued the following statement:

If the RNC wants to represent conservatives and the Republican Party, then they have to act like conservatives – in a moral, fiscal and ethical manner. When RNC officials seem to think it wise to spend a grandmother’s monthly donation on wooing the younger generation by taking them to a bondage-themed sex club instead of helping to elect a conservative, a real problem exists.

I’d say all of this doesn’t bold well for Republicans and presents serious challenges in their efforts to win back control of Congress in November. All I can say is “Go Steele!”

Bolling: Latest Blip on Hypocrite Radar

1

We all have had chuckles – plus a large dose of disgust – watching all the Republicans who railed against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and voted en masse against it, proceed to tout the benefits in their own districts. Now, Bob McDonnell’s hand-picked “jobs czar,” Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, is joining their ranks.

Bolling spent last year attacking the federal “stimulus bill,”  saying that all the efforts to combat the Wall-Street-greed-driven Great Recession, were “massive federal spending bills that would result in the largest expansion of government in 40 years” and “will balloon the size of the federal government and increase the federal debt dramatically, and…do little to stimulate economic growth.”

Now, Bolling has gotten stimulus religion, Last week, according to the Washington Post, the lieutenant governor, speaking on behalf of his boss Bob McDonnell, praised almost 40 energy conservation projects proposed by local governments in Virginia. The cost – funds from the Recovery Act – totals $13.2 million.

“Jobs will be the first dividend from these innovative programs and projects, but they also have the potential to save tax dollars and reduce energy costs for Virginians for years to come,”  Bolling said.

I have just one comment: Welcome to the “GOP Hypocrisy Hall of Shame,” Mr. Bolling.

This year, the Democratic National Committee has kept a count of the hypocritical GOP office holders who accused the Obama Administration and the Democratic majority in Congress of horrible crimes because of the Recovery Act. So far, more than 100 governors, members of Congress and other office holders have made the “Hypocrisy Hall of Fame.” (I prefer calling it the Hypocrisy Hall of Shame.)

Bill Bolling joins Bob McDonnell, who revealed his hypocrisy earlier. McDonnell has praised a $24 million stimulus grant that allows Virginia to establish an Office of Health Information Technology. During the gubernatorial campaign McDonnell argued that the stimulus would be a bad policy for the country.

Then, there is Rep.Eric Cantor (R-7th), who repeatedly has called the stimulus bill a failure, while simultaneously seeking high-speed rail stimulus money for his district. Cantor also held a job fair in his district recently, one that featured employers who had accepted stimulus funds. In fact, over half of the employers who participated had received stimulus money.

Perhaps the strangest hypocrite is Rep. Frank Wolf (R-10th). Wolf voted against the Recovery Act and then proceeded to criticize former Gov. Tim Kaine for not spending the stimulus money fast enough!

“We could use that money desperately. We’re in a critical situation. The economic growth and the opportunities here depend on improving transportation. There are a lot of things up here that that money could be used for,” Wolf told reporters in October. (I have a suggestion for Wolf. The next time you think your district has a “critical situation,” don’t vote against a remedy.)  

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, unfortunately my congressman, also ranted and raved about how awful the Recovery Act was. He voted against it twice, then endorsed a project by NTELOS Holding Corp., which got a $16 million federal broadband stimulus award. Goodlatte even let the company give him credit because of letters he wrote in support.

I am quite pleased to see the Democratic Party of Virginia has begun to awaken from its post-November come. A DPV spokesman was quick to comment on Bill Bolling’s political hypocrisy.

“Apparently, being chief job creation officer means taking credit for jobs that other people have created. Bill Bolling should drop the double-talk and admit that the Recovery Act is creating jobs in Virginia. Just one year ago, Bolling said the Recovery Act ‘was not a stimulus plan at all.’ Virginians have to wonder, has he changed his mind? Or did he just think he could get away with hypocrisy?” said DPV spokesman Jared Leopold.

Evidently, Republicans think that they can get away with voting against every proposal of the Obama administration, while simultaneously reaping benefits. After all, the Hypocrisy Hall of Shame now has over 100 GOP members.

Hearing on Metro Budget Proposals in Arlington Tonight

0

As Metro officials face a $189 million budget gap for the 2011 fiscal year, this is their paradox:

  • If they propose service cuts, commuters will scream bloody murder.
  • If they propose fare increases, commuters will scream bloody murder.
  • If they ask for more funding, local politicians will scream bloody murder.

Metro officials are holding a public hearing tonight at 7pm at the Arlington County Board Office (2100 Clarendon Blvd, 3rd floor, above the  Courthouse Metro). If you can’t make the hearing, Metro has created an online survey to get public input about the budget options (note: the survey link didn’t work for me just now, but I’m leaving it in the post in hopes it’s a temporary glitch). The questionnaire only takes a few minutes & the results will be incorporated into the final staff report to the Metro Board later this month.

Both fare increases & service cuts are unfortunate options that will only discourage transit usage. So why is Metro even considering them?

It certainly doesn’t help that Metro has to ask three different jurisdictions for money, while most major transit systems are controlled by only one. That regularly leaves Metro short on cash, forcing them to squeeze resources from their riders & their budget (often cutting preventative maintenance funding). As today’s Washington Post editorial points out, “Metro’s ridership contributes about 55 percent of the system’s $1.4 billion operating budget, more than the ridership of virtually any other major transit system in the nation. That contribution is set to rise as  a result of stiff fare increases.”

Looking at the big picture, local officials continually prioritize spending on new & existing roads over funding for Metro. Virginia officials have been practically begging Arlington to let them spend $75 million for “spot improvements” in hopes of improving traffic flow on I66, which carries only about 100,000 cars per day. But the Virginia General Assembly, led by anti-tax Republicans, regularly balks at a dedicated funding source for Metro, which carries 1.2 million passenger trips per weekday at vastly lower costs to our public health & environment.

You get what you pay for. And if Virginia, Maryland & DC can’t come together to give Metro the support it needs, the system will continue to struggle.

Photo via Flickr’s ElvertBarnes

Cross-posted from The Green Miles

Conference Call: Salazar and Browner Discuss Obama Energy Plan

8

I just got off a conference call with Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar and Carol Browner, Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, the subject of which was “our nation’s energy security and the Administration’s efforts to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, create jobs, and lead the way towards a clean energy economy.”  Here are a few highlights, with particular focus on Virginia. {Also, click here for a press release on the “Comprehensive Strategy for Offshore Oil and Gas Development and Exploration”}

*Browner emphasized that this is a comprehensive energy strategy to reduce dependence on foreign oil and create a clean energy economy. It includes fuel efficient cars, advanced biofuels, nuclear power, energy efficiency, “greening” the federal vehicle fleet, efforts by the Defense Department “to enhance energy security and independence and reduce harmful emissions, including encouraging the development and use of domestically produced advanced biofuels,” and offshore oil drilling.

*Browner emphasized that we “can’t drill our way to energy independence.”

*Salazar stressed that the Obama administration’s energy plan is “balanced” between development and conservation.  He emphasized that development needs to be in the right places with the right information. He said we need a “cautious approach” to Arctic development.

*Salazar also pointed out that “we’ll never drill our way to energy independence.” He noted that there’s a “relatively minor amount” of oil in the Outer Continental Shelf, definitely not a “panacea.”  He added that there are perhaps 100 million barrels in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.

*Browner said that the automobile fuel economy rules to be announced tomorrow will save “1.8 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program.”

*Browner emphasized that Congress needs to pass “comprehensive energy legislation.”

*Salazar said that the Arctic is a “special place,” that we need to move forward with the science and find out what’s there.

*With regard to Virginia, Salazar said that the plan is to move forward with the process for lease sales, with a decision possible by late 2011/early 2012. A decision will be made after evaluation of environmental issues and also potential conflicts with military training needs.

*In response to a question by the Virginian-Pilot, Salazar said that we know very little about oil resources in the Atlantic, that the information is 30 years old, and that we “owe it to the American people” to make decisions based on good information.

*On the issue of revenue sharing with states, Salazar said this new proposal didn’t specifically address that issue and that revenue sharing is covered under existing law.  According to Salazar, there are “no revenue sharing provisions except for limited exceptions.” Browner added that revenue sharing is part of the discussions going on in the Senate, including with respect to the Kerry/Lieberman/Graham efforts.

*Salazar stressed the importance of offshore wind, stating that the quality of the wind resources off the east coast is very high, and that transmission issues aren’t significant compared to many other locations. Salazar added that we need to develop energy from many sources, and that he doesn’t see offshore wind and oil development as being “in conflict” with one another.

Could Cooch’s Crusade for Health Care Reform Repeal Backfire?

3

Could Ken Cuccinelli and his right-wingnut allies’ crusade against health care reform provide a boost to Democrats this fall? It’s starting to appear this could be the case.

Top Republicans are increasingly worried that GOP candidates this fall might be burned by a fire that’s roaring through the conservative base: demand for the repeal of President Barack Obama’s new health care law.

It’s fine to criticize the health law and the way Democrats pushed it through Congress without a single GOP vote, these party leaders say. But focusing on its outright repeal carries two big risks.

Repeal is politically and legally unlikely, and grass-roots activists may feel disillusioned by a failed crusade. More important, say strategists from both parties, a fiercely repeal-the-bill stance might prove far less popular in a general election than in a conservative-dominated GOP primary, especially in states such as Illinois and California.

Democrats are counting on that scenario…

Yes, we are counting on that scenario. Which is why I say: Go Cooch Go!

Main Street not Wall Street

1

Over the past months I have been traveling around the 10th Congressional District talking to local groups, and meeting with individuals from Fairfax to Winchester. People all across the district are concerned about their jobs, the falling value of their homes, and about what the future holds for their children.

Our message of job creation combined with my background in Workforce Development is resonating throughout the district.  Over the past 15 years I have been fighting for people who lost their jobs do to no fault of their own and working with local community colleges and one stop career centers to get people back on their feet and back to work. This experience has given me the knowledge to get our economy back on track and working again for Main Street not Wall Street.

The message has been working, but we need to get it out to more voters in the 10th District. Please donate $100, $50, or $25 to help get this message out to a broader audience. Our fundraising quarter ends at midnight tonight, so not only will you be helping us get our message out, but you will also show that we have momentum going into the fall campaign.

Frank Wolf has voted time and time again against common since solutions to put our economy first.  Just recently Wolf voted against “the Jobs for Main Street Act” which redirects $48.3 billion from Wall Street to help put people to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing public buildings, and cleaning our air and water. In a time with mounting debt all Frank Wolf has mustered is more soaring rhetoric about being fiscally conservative but Wolf mouth does not a line with his vote. Wolf just voted against “pay as you go” budget rules, requiring all bills to be budget neutral.

With your donation of $100, $50, or $25, I will be able to make the case that Frank Wolf is more interested in partisan politics than he is with getting Virginians back to work.

Thanks-

Rich Anthony

Annabel Park Talks “Coffee” and “Tea” On Kojo Nnamdi Show

1



Great stuff from Coffee Party founder Annabel Park on the Kojo Nnamdi Show. The key message? As one commenter explains, it’s that “everyone needs to be an active participant in our democracy at all times – and not just during political campaigns or critical policy decisions”; also, that everyone needs to “participate in democracy through civil discourse geared toward the discovery of common ground.”  As another commenter writes, “We do have a Government that we can fix.” This is in stark contrast to the Tea Party, which – as Annabel explains – “has declared war on the federal government and objects to pretty much what it stands for conceptually.”  In stark contrast, Annabel believes that “the federal government really has to be part of the solution.” I couldn’t agree more – with Annabel and the Coffee Party, that is.